I liked the 2nd one more for how epic and grandiose the story felt. This one was a bit more basic and by the numbers with the story, and pacing was a bit uneven. Also found it ridiculous that college dorms would be packed with partying and life on Christmas Eve...aren't all schools supposed to be closed for weeks around Christmas? But the movie was a lot of fun, great kills and great performance from the actor playing Art.
shareIs it better than the first? I thought that one was okay, although I loved the second.
shareWould love to know what led you to this conclusion. I thought it was the weakest tbh.
shareYou’re wrong bucko. This was certainly the best of the 3. Terrifier 2 dragged on too long and the original was low budget rubbish. Maybe when you get the chance, rewatch it and try paying closer attention. I know these films go over people’s heads on the first watch.
shareWe're all entitled to our own opinion. Don't get me wrong. I'm a fan of these series but they're not that deep where things are going over people's heads. I pointed out the lore to date is sort of patchy but if you disagree I'm all ears.
shareAll 3 might be about even, but I would say Part I is the best because they didn't have so much of the supernatural stuff: Art was more grounded in the first one. He was just a creepy guy in a clown costume instead of a demon or alien
share