MovieChat Forums > Narcos (2015) Discussion > Pablo Escobar was not simply a 'bad' or ...

Pablo Escobar was not simply a 'bad' or 'evil' person


Based on the show anyway. I dislike this dichotomous society we find ourselves in, where someone is obstinately deemed ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Many people try to chastise Escobar; however, based on the show, he was essentially a pretty good person - albeit a complex and troubled one. The crux of the matter is in distributing cocaine worldwide, Pablo Escobar gave the people what they wanted. If people want to indulge in recreational drug experimentation, then I firmly believe they should be allowed to. We should all be accountable for our own actions and Pablo here was simply providing the means to fulfil their wishes.

Various elements of his character were actually admirable. He was a bit of a Robin Hood type character: giving to the poor, investing in the local community and also sporting clubs. Would an evil man do this? He loved his family dearly - even his nasty mother - whom to me was the real villain of the show (admitting to stealing shoes and causing the death of Tata’s brother). During Carlos’ death, Pablo heroically risked his life trying to save him, throwing himself into the incoming gunfire. This was an extremely impressive, selfless act; yet more evidence to attest to his good nature. He even forgave his mother who caused his death.

Wagner Moura stole the show when his daughter innocently asked how Santa would find them now that they were not at home. He tearfully replied, ‘Santa will always find your good and kind heart’, which to me captures the understated sensitivity of the much-maligned Escobar. Towards the end of the season, we also saw him leave his remaining money to his father, such was his unselfish nature. This was the father who disowned him, but Pablo could see past this. Indeed, so much about him should be admired: amassing one of the greatest fortunes in the world, taking everything he wanted from life and not giving in to detractors such as the government and police. And he did all of this with quite a progressive approach: employing women and a multicultural workforce.

Obviously, Pablo Escobar was not innocent and that is not what I’m saying. He did some bad things without doubt. Often though he was provoked and simply defending himself, his loved ones and his territory. Of course, all men should be entitled to do this.

I think my favourite scene of the show was reserved for the finale where he reminisced with the imaginary presence of his cousin, Gustavo. Choking up once more, Pablo remarked that, ‘everything started to fall apart the day you left’. These are not the words of a ruthless, evil man; they are the words of a complex character with a lot of good to him. Following this, the show then concluded after another emotional conversation with his children. He advised his daughter that he had been taking careful care of her bunny. Ask yourself this: do evil men spend their free time caring for little bunnies?

reply

you know I often find myself thinking the best out of people and I always try to see the good in them and think of the reasons behind their actions, but it was really hard for me to do so with Pablo. I agree with you when you say no one's just good or bad, we all have some of both, but all of the bad things he did outcast the few good things he ever did. To me, the fact that he killed so many innocent people, including children, is just unforgivable no matter how much he loved his family, who I feel no sympathy towards by the way (except for the children), or how he took care of bunnies. And I did feel a bit of warmth inside when I saw he gave his dad the rest of his money, but let's be real, if he thought that was the ONLY money he had left, would've he given it to his dad? I highly doubt it but I guess we'll never know...

reply

[deleted]

I'm from Colombia and I'm not even mad. This that you said is true for people even in my own country, people that know first hand what awful things Pablo did, consider him to be a saint (I'm not even exaggerating here, they pray to him and all). Narcos is a well narrated story and is capable of represent the duality of Pablo Escobar character.

reply

[deleted]

Without the constant intervention of people trying to stop him, he would not have killed all those politicians, police officers and civilians. Yes, people would still have gotten high on his supply and died, BUT HEY! If they want to kill themselves by snorting that shit, they're the ones at fault. No one's forcing them to do it.
The fact that cigarettes are legal yet cocaine isn't really angers me. I'm not sure about the actual statistics here, but I've heard more stories about people dying from cigarettes than cocaine.

Back to Escobar. He did set up a car bomb that ended up killing many innocent civilians including children, which is horrible and tragic, but the civilians were collateral damage and I doubt that Escobar would ever go out of his way to intentionally hurt a child. Maybe I'm wrong here. I never knew what the real Escobar was like. In this show he seemed to have a heart.

reply

Tony Soprano was a nice guy sometimes too

reply

Why compare a fictional character to Escobar?

reply

He didn’t GIVE to the poor. He BOUGHT the poor. Look at it as he was buying people to protect him who wouldn't snitch on him. People who would do anything for him if he asked. Thats what he was doing.

reply