For those who rated it a 1
Even if you guys didn't like the concept of the film, how can anyone rate it a 1? Tom Hardy's acting was speculator least of all.
This is like rating all art-house or surrealist films (like by David Lynch or Kar Wai Wong) a 1 simply because you don't like such said concept/ niche films.
If you dislike such films, at least rate it accordingly - on it's themes, technical aspects, merits, etc. If it was truly made like it came from a prepubescent pissing all over the wall high as a pineapple floating in the sky, then yes, give it a 1. But there's a reason it's 91% on Rotten Tomatoes, rated by over 190 critics who's job is watching movies.
I'm not insulting anyone of their intelligence. People have different tastes, have varying knowledge of the disciplines of film-making and storytelling, but for goodness' sake, give some amount of reasonable objectivity when rating films