Spoiler: I wish they had shown...

The baby wasn’t crying like an ordinary baby would, and Cecilia’s facial expression + the fact she killed it would signify that the baby looked like a demon or something

It’s one of those situations where they likely felt the baby would be scarier if its appearance was left to the audience’s imagination . But we can deduce that the baby wasn’t normal or human

I think it made for a more effective ending not to show the baby. I also liked that the baby's fate was left ambiguous. Yes she raised a rock and brought it down, but did she smush the baby or did she reconsider at the last moment. Who's to say?

Who else thought the rest of the sentence would be ..."HER TITS"

Well the thing is I believe the Bible passage behind the picture of the true Mother Mary is the key behind all of this. It’s from "2 Corinthians 11:14".

Which says, 13: “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

14:And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

I’ve given you Corinthians chapter 13 as well to shed some more light on this.

It seems clear to me, that what they were doing either by ignorance or by CHOICE was to create the offspring of Satan instead of that jive about trying to recreate or creat the offspring of Christ. Christ never married or had any children & it’s blasphemy to even think so. So either Father T knew was unaware of what he was doing or he knew the deal and was always aware of the truth that what was on the nail was a demons/Satan’s DNA and that the nail WASN’T the one that was used in Christ’s crucifixion but it belonged to someone/something else.

Hence the passage from Corinthians 13 which I included about false apostles (priest/nuns/clergy) making themselves out to be the apostles of Christ when they’re not. 14: For even Satan can be made to appear as an angel of light. It’s the truth he can. He doesn’t have to appear as a scary horned demon with a pitchfork tail, he can assume any shape he wishes and he can convince you he is a holy being of light when the truth is the exact opposite. So considering all of this I think that’s the deal with this movie. Hopefully some of you think this makes sense.

Well the thing is I believe the Bible passage that Cecilia discovers behind the picture of the true Mother Mary is the key behind all of this. It’s from "2 Corinthians 11:14".

Which says, 13: “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

14:And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

I’ve given you Corinthians chapter 13 as well to shed some more light on this.

It seems clear to me, that what they were doing either by ignorance or by CHOICE was to create the offspring of Satan instead of that jive about trying to recreate or creat the offspring of Christ. Christ never married or had any children & it’s blasphemy to even think so. So either Father T was unaware of what he was doing or he knew the deal and was always aware of the truth that what was on the nail was a demons/Satan’s DNA and that the nail WASN’T the one that was used in Christ’s crucifixion but it belonged to someone/something else.

Hence the passage from Corinthians 13 which I included about false apostles (priest/nuns/clergy) making themselves out to be the apostles of Christ when they’re not. 14: For even Satan can be made to appear as an angel of light. It’s the truth he can. He doesn’t have to appear as a scary horned demon with a pitchfork tail, he can assume any shape he wishes and he can convince you he is a holy being of light when the truth is the exact opposite. So considering all of this I think that’s the deal with this movie. Hopefully some of you think this makes sense.