Is a 3rd reboot of Spiderman really needed?

After the COLOSSAL misfire that was the Amazing Spider-Man series, and the overwhelming success of the MCU?

Yes. Yes it was needed.

This is a different situation.

The others were SONY films and they needed to be done or SONY would lose the rights to the spiderman films

[deleted]

[deleted]

It's not the 3rd reboot, it's "only" the 2nd.
Raimi/Maguire = 1st iteration (not a reboot)
Webb/Garfield = 2nd iteration (1st reboot)
Watts/Holland = 3rd iteration (2nd reboot)

The 70s live-action Spider-man didn't have any movies theatrically released in the U.S. If it did then you could count Raimi as a reboot.

It is needed. The movie was awesome and Tom Holland is the Spiderman we have been waiting for. He was spot on.

The second incarnation of modern Spiderman movies was terrible with a horrible cast. This has to be an improvement. PLUS there is still money on the table. Hollygreed knows no bounds.

festyy.com/eaIN42