Nicole Kidman?
What happened to Rachel Weisz??
I prefer Rachel to Nicole.
i prefer nicole, personally.
firth put her up for the role as he's wanted to work with her for years and was supposed to have on "stoker", which he regrettably had to pull out of a few months before filming.
"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox".
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
I'm happy for you, by the way, its a nothing role, so it will suit her well.
aye, it will, because nicole is talented enough as an actress to take a small or one dimensional part and make something interesting of it... unlike weisz, who gets lost in the cast unless shes at the forefront.
and no, i wasn't insinuating that firth wanted weisz out of the film. she had to drop out due to filming conflicts.
"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox". share
[deleted]
kidman was deemed too old to play "the constant gardener"- i couldn't personally see her play that character anyway, and weisz gave us some stunning work there.
i didn't explain myself badly, you just saw that i was a kidman fan and decided to take what i had to say offensively.
"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox".
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
You really should get medical help.
My goodness.
Has someone forgotten to take his pills or taken too much!
What is a lie?
That Colin Firth personally asked Nicole Kidman to replace Rachel Weiz after Rachel pulled out? Which is the lie?
Goodness gracious!
Get medical help.
I thought Nicole was perfect in that role and the movie; very authentic. Maybe it's her British Empire background, but she seemed like the sort of person who would have married this man and borne up with his challenges. Rachel is too emotionally florid and exotic-looking to play this kind of role. She would have been a distraction. I like both actresses, but this part played to Nicole's strong points, the sort of restrained emotionality that I associate with a "well-bred" British woman of that era. Yes, I'm stereotyping, but it just felt right to me. I really like her with less glamour and makeup. Her real beauty shines through. I wish people would stop going on about Botox. If there is a single actress in Hollywood that doesn't get it, I'd like to know who, and it improves their overall appearance dramatically.
share