MovieChat Forums > Django Unchained (2012) Discussion > Why didbt the Black people go back to a...

Why didbt the Black people go back to africa?


I was shocked when i saw this.
If i would be a Negro i would leave After the war in america was over.

Sorry for my bad english

reply

America was still their home. The liberated slaves would have never been to Africa. Some might have chosen to go to Africa to see the land of their ancestors, and they might have stayed because black people would be the majority, but it would have still been a foreign country to them.

reply

I don't think that was an option.

reply

Liberia begs to differ.

reply

Ah ok.

Thank you.

I still wonder. Even today there is so much hate in america with black people. I would have turned back.

reply

Yeah I don't know what I would have done. I'm British and I don't know much about American history. If I was a liberated slave in America, I'd probably just be glad to have my freedom. Plus I don't know how available and affordable international travel was in those days.

reply

In the immediate aftermath there was a lot of confusion. If you read interviews conducted at the time, most of the freed slaves express that they miss their old way of life, and most said they'd go back into slavery if they could. As slaves, they were given a food, housing, healthcare, and after they were too old to work, were taken care of until death. Suddenly thrust out into the "real world," where they had to find jobs, find housing, buy food, find a doctor, etc. was a massive shock. The effects of that reverberated for years, and some would argue they are being felt to this day.

Imagine facing all of that, then trying to manage an international relocation on top of all that, especially in the 1860s or '70s. Even today, moving to another country is daunting, now imagine it for a recently freed slave. The language barrier alone would be a dealbreaker, much less all the other challenges that come with such a move.

reply

Where did you read these interviews? Got a link?

reply

Suddenly thrust out into the "real world," where they had to find jobs, find housing, buy food, find a doctor, etc. was a massive shock.


Just imagine, You need to work so you can have money to take care of yourself and your family but the only employment available would be to work for their masters and their masters would continue to give them slave wages. Who else would hire them and give them a fair wage at the time. Who would sell them land or property even if they could scrape some sort of money together, again the problem of how they would even be able to do that. White doctors would not treat them at the time either. A lot of the time their ONLY recourse to survive would be to steal food and now they are criminals etc.

We really shot ourselves in the foot. This is the legacy of slavery.

reply

I still wonder. Even today there is so much hate in america with black people. I would have turned back.


Today? I guess you haven't been to America. I'm 64, and things have changed since I was a child. I couldn't get an apartment when I graduated college or a car loan, etc.

Today, I'm retired and living in a beautiful suburb. Yes, most of the folks in my town are white, but my wife and I are not treated any differently than anyone else. There is literally no other place on Earth I would rather live than America.

Regarding your original question, the vast majority of slaves by the time the Civil War happened were born in America. They had no other home to go to than America. Unfortunately, more than a million freed slaves died from starvation and disease after the war ended.


reply

The country of Liberia exists for this very reason. I guess most didn't know about it.

reply

Yeah, the same way they didnt know that Madagascar was right off the fucking shores of Africa. lol What's a boat? lol what's exploration? They didnt even leave the plantation after freedom. Zero frontier spirit or courage to do the same thing millions of Europeans were willing to do when they came to America. No jobs, no money, no homes, barely spoke English or not at all, but they all had ingenuity and a hardworking spirit. Freed Slaves? Nope. Build a shack and sit in there singing songs and shit on the floor. What the fuck was Lincoln thinking?! lol What an overhyped moron. Literally the worst president for what he did to America and blacks.

reply

How can someone go "back" to a place where they have never been? This is one of the most ignorant statement of all time. It would be like Native Americans in 1880 telling white people to go back to England. Sure their ancestors came from there but that was several hundred years ago.

Yes Liberia and Sierra Leone were created so the US government can get rid of black people. Why would anyone chose exile in a poverty stricken destitute place when they can stay in the country they helped build in the first place and demand equal rights?

reply

How can Jews go "back" to Israel? Maybe we should get rid of Israel, oops! This only works for blacks.

reply

the west created israel because of ww2, the situation is different

reply

[deleted]

Jews always wanted to go back to their Promised Land. Very different situation.

reply

Sierra Leone was created by the British.

reply

Cos they are Black and their home is africa.

Thats what i meant.

Even today they complain about racism....

Africa is s huge country and not just jungle or sand.

They could Start anew and maje it bigger.

Imagine all the celebs going back . No Negro hate anymore in usa


Sorry for my bad english

reply

^Africa is a continent not a country.

African Americans can't go 'back' to a place they've never been. Also because of slavery and the mixing of the slaves from different countries, AAs are not just from one African country.

reply

^^^The OP probably believes that Cleopatra was white and Africa is just a small village in Sweden. There’s a word to describe people like the OP. I’ll give you a hint…………..they execute them in Texas.

Sorry, my Negro hatred is showing.

reply

This person is clearly a troll. If not, no idiocy on this level is worth giving engagement.

reply

because Africa is a literal shithole. Slavery in America was probably still more favorable than being a prince in Africa.

reply

Because African-Americans don't come from Africa. Their ancestors do which is different.

Knowledge of any language, culture, religion, family and geographic origin was destroyed by slavers. It's like telling an adopted orphan to return home to their biological family. Not possible.

BTW, the few African-Americans who went to Liberia still had to fight the original inhabitants to live there since they were coming as invaders and weren't originally from that area.

Anyway, the solution for racism is to fight for tolerance. If blacks went to Africa, whites to Europe and Asians to Asia, intolerance and hatred would still exist. Native Americans, Europeans, Asians and Africans were warring among themselves for thousands of years before there was an integrated "United" States.

reply

If a native American asked me why I don't give back to Finland or Germany, the lands of my ancestors, is say that I didn't know the language and couldn't buy a house or get a job there. And I had no idea who my distant relatives there are, and they had no idea who I am and that they certainly wouldn't feel enough familial affection to take in an unemployable immigrant if I ever found them.

And if I were a freed slave, I'd also say that I had no money to pay for the one-way ticket to the old country anyway!

reply

This entire thread is absurd. And yes, what you write is as close to the answer as one can get. How does someone in 1865, whose ancestors were brought from Africa in perhaps 1700 simply "go back?" Five generations have passed, and the freed slave can likely trace his ancestry to 10 different African nations, none of which he's ever visited, or likely even heard of, and none of which speaks a language he understands. If someone were to suggest I "go back," where would I go? Sicily? Mexico? Cheyenne, Wyoming?

The original poster is obviously trolling, so yeah, but the seriousness with which some people have made ignorant and outright racist replies prompted me to chime in.

reply

Sometimes I give a serious answer to a troll question, because there are people on this forum ignorant enough to take the trolls seriously.

Ignorance can be fixed, to some degree.

reply

Europeans slowed down their warring once their supplies became abundant thanks to technology and science. Unfortunately, Africa will ALWAYS be in the stone age for obvious reasons, and Asia was able to copycat thanks to communication technology, which Africans still can't figure out lol They will always be in a perpetual state of dependency.

reply

"Europeans slowed down their warring"

WWII

reply

>Europe
>the World

reply

Germany started WWII. Your idol Hitler wanted to rule the world.

reply

Technically World War II started before Germany did a thing. Italy and Japan invaded Ethiopia and China. But of course, jewish media likes to blame Hitler for everything, and no thanks for giving the zionists a homeland before their messiah came (a no-no for real jews).

reply

Two horrific atrocities:

Nazi Germany's Holocaust
Russian Stalin's murderous rampage

Both by European countries.

Of course, you would defend Hitler.

reply

Sorry. Hitler is third behind Stalin and Mao. Both rulers of countries in ASIA. Both being fought against by Germany and Japan (so they were literally trying to save lives). And anyone with a brain knows from census statistics, the jewish population ROSE during WWII, so the holocaust is fabricated bullshit, unless you believe the death numbers given AND that jewish women gave birth to 3 babies a year!

reply

Your comment reveals that you're a Holocaust denier and Nazi sympathizer.

reply

It reveals I have a point and you have none. You throw these labels around like they mean anything. They dont discredit ANYTHING I SAY. They make you look foolish and like your reaching for something. Sorry. But it aint there. You're grasping at straws like all the lemmings who dont know what actually happened and blindly believe the same media that has been lying for over 50 years.

reply

Nevertheless, the labels fit you like a tee.

I have no interest in debating a neo-Nazi.

reply

You label people yet are anti-Nazi. You've become what you hate! LOL And you're too stupid to see it.

reply

Yes, I'm proudly anti-Nazi.

reply

most fools are proud of it.

reply

Once again, you prove yourself to be a neo-Nazi. My work is done here.

reply

yea, it was a real mystery up until this point. Great job Sherlock. You dont even know what the neo- part means dumbass.

reply

Does neo offend you? Do you want to be known as just a Nazi?

reply

No need for apologies...
Spelling 7/10
Trolling 3/10

reply