No Cold War level tension + plane designs unchanged in 35 years = flop
Title says it all.
sharePlus funding Scientology and Chinese censorship.
shareIt doesn't matter to me. Since 2016 I haven't paid to watch a movie and never will again. I'm sure the moralists in Hollywood wouldn't want my tainted money.
A VPN and a streaming box allows me to watch what I want without soiling Hollywood's coffers.
Valid points!
But people will see it anyway , for some reason people are chomping at the bit for this , whereas other sequels / remakes they will shun on principle no matter how good it is.
I would love a legitimate sequel to Top Gun...patriotic, high testorone, with great characters and story. Would love to see a great story about where our heroes from that movie ended up, but alas, it looks like Hollywood has already wrapped it's lips around CCP dick and we will get nothing of the sort.
This is the basic design of almost all modern fighter aircraft. Designed in the late 1960s through the early 1970s. F14 - F18. Example: The F16's first flight was in 1974.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16_Fighting_Falcon
So the design is even older than you thought. BUT there is nothing like a fighter jet on earth. Nothing comes close. Probably never will in anyone's lifetime who will read this in the next 50 years. PS. I know about drones and rockets.
Here's a list of the F planes(fighter) on wikipedia. Fascinating subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aircraft_of_the_United_States#Fighter
I still don't like the original. We bought it just to see if my opinion would change. It didn't.
Not going to see this one.
Pro-Communist China Propaganda after the pandemic = flop. I hope they lose millions on this, and I hope that the livelihoods of everyone involved in this production are destroyed.
shareTechnology has improved and changed greatly. The F-18 outperforms the F-14 in every way except for top speed, and the F-35C has a huge advantage with it's stealth. Autonomous drones are another leap forward from the 1980's.
shareThere's something missing from your equation. The calculation result is incorrect.
share