23% gave this a 10/10?


Please tell me I'm not reading that right....

If this is the sad truth about moviegoers, seeing it has officially cemented in my mind the idea that humanity is doomed. When a sub-par comedy like this (5/10 at best IMO) gets treated as if it was royalty, it is a truly embarassing day for filmmaking. I think over time audiences have somehow duped themselves into thinking a few good jokes = A good Comedy Film. Definitely the worst movie of the summer, let alone the year, that I've seen.
As a suggestion; If you want a truly great comedy that doesn't degrade the intelligence of its audience by resorting to offensive and worse, Unfunny, slapstick humour, spend your money seeing 'The Way, Way Back'.

==================
I suffer from Night Blindness.



reply

I gave this a 7/10, which is a very high rating for me to give a comedy(typically I rate them 5 or below). This was easily the best comedy I've seen sense Forgetting Sara Marshal.

reply

THIS WAS THE FUNNIEST MOVIE I HAVE SEEN IN YEARS. I GIVE IT A 10/10

reply

I gave it a 9/10/ everybody is different on what they like so who care what others say or think. It was very funny and comparing it to pulp fiction when it's not even in the same category is a bit off. BTW pulp fiction is one the best movies I have seen but in no way you can compare it to a comedy. Go Millers.

reply

"A few good jokes" is pretty much the ESSENCE of a comedy movie... Sure, how hard the laughter is will vary according to the person, but it's better than NO good jokes, in something that's meant to be funny.

"The Way, Way Back" is great, but it's much more of a comedy drama than this tried to be, so of course it feels more satisfying... This still had some solid laughs. You may not rate it as highly as some people, but if you don't allow for differing tastes, then you're pretty shortsighted.






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

someone needs to take his life a little less seriously

reply

[deleted]

Three years after the fact, but I'll chime in anyway - Not everyone uses the same criteria as you. Learn to deal with it. I didn't rate it a 10, but it was much funnier than I expected it to be as I am usually disappointed by Jen Anniston movies, and it has great staying power. I am watching it on TBS right now and it is just as funny as the first time I watched it.

Anyway, I don't see anything faulty in the rationale behind rating this movie a 10 as it is IMO, one of the best pure comedies in the last five or six years.

reply

I gave this movie a solid 7/10, because I just caught it on TV, had never heard of it, and it was reasonably enjoyable and made me laugh.

I could be desensitised however as I caught The 40 Year Old Virgin on TV the other day and thought it was quite funny, but when I watched it when it fist came out I didn't like it at all.

So my standards may have dropped because actually good comedies are rarer than big foot sightings.

If a comedy can maintain my interest and make me laugh a few times, then it's decent, as most comedies cannot do that at all.

Can anyone suggest any good comedies?

reply

Also finding this three years later. As one of the 23% let me tell you what a 10 means to me. It means the movie is highly re-watchable, and had me uncontrollably laughing at more than one point. This movie fits that to a tee. I end up buying 1-2 movies a year tops, and this one was the rare one that made the cut (unlike Horrible Bosses.) This movie was well-acted, and you actually DID care about what happened to these four people. Yes, at times it was silly - and sometimes, you need that out of a movie.

I've only given 77 movies or TV shows a 10/10 in my life (and I've seen a lot) and only 15 of those were comedies, ranging from the classic ("The Graduate") to films I never thought I could see myself liking ("Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle".)

Doesn't sound like a 5/10 to me. You are entitled to your opinion, I just think your opinion sucks.

reply