And I ask this question in all seriousness WTF dude this movie is ok I'm not going to say is bad it did keep me entertained and invested in the story even with the long duration, but this movie doesn't deserve to be between the 250 best movies of all time is ridiculous is just a decent biopic if this movie was directed by Michael Bay people would receive it like the totally forgettable movie it is
But is Nolan, so the fangirls act like this was some deep philosophical experience or some shit, but this is not deep is just the story of some weird looking nerd who made a bomb to burn some random Asian people and them pretend to feel bad about it
Simple, it's because Nolan made Batman cool again after Batman & Robin.
Comic book fans pined for a "serious" and "dark" Batman movie, and drug Batman & Robin through the mud for decades because it dared to make a grown man dressed as a bat look silly. But Nolan made it cool, so fans have been blindly devoted to him ever since.
I don't like Nolan movies. I've never liked Nolan movies. But, when I look at the current state of film, its not difficult to see why he's so popular. Over the last 15 years, audiences have been bombarded with sequels, prequels and remakes. There are only a handful of filmmakers who make original films anymore and people are dying for entertainment with some substance. Nolan doesn't give his audience that at all, but he's very good at making it seem like he does.
Nolan's entire approach to filmmaking is centered around making his audience feel special and intelligent. He picks topics that seem complex on the surface - like multilayered dream realities or intricate scientific concepts, which, when well explained, are surprisingly simple. But as his scripts overly convolute the topic only to then overexplain it in long, unfocused exposition dumps, they're are given the illusion of depth precisely because they feel like a lecture.
Then there's his insistence on presenting himself as a cinema purist. Refusing to mix sound for anything less than top-tier speakers might seem like a commitment to quality, but really it's just a technical failing. After all, shouldn't great sound sound amazing on any system? It's just an aesthetic choice to appeal to the film buffs with a slightly pretentious streak who want to feel that they're getting something no one else will give them, even if what they're getting is objectively worse.
Nolan also has a penchant for sprinkling in references to deep philosophy without actually diving into the depths of those questions. Quoting a line from the Bhagavad Gita might sound profound, but it's just surface-level intellectualism. He's giving his audience a taste of something profound without actually having to deliver on profundity. It simply isn't needed. Even if the audience isn't familiar with whatever philosophy he's espousing, they know from the surrounding culture that it's an important text, idea, philosophy etc., and they'll credit his work through association. Nolan fans do all the heavy lifting, and this makes them feel smart. Nolan's genius lies more in aesthetics than substance. He creates the illusion of depth and intelligence without fully delivering on it. And apparently, that's what some audiences want.
its not difficult to see why he's so popular. Over the last 15 years, audiences have been bombarded with sequels, prequels and remakes. There are only a handful of filmmakers who make original films anymore and people are dying for entertainment with some substance. Nolan doesn't give his audience that at all, but he's very good at making it seem like he does.
It's because Hollywood isn't so great anymore. I mean, it will always churn out entertaining movies to some degree, but its golden age from the 30s to the 80s is gone, and basically someone like Nolan is today's equivalent of David Lean or whatever. He's the best of a mediocre bunch.
I’d say the 90’s produced even better films and more of them, but obviously that’s debatable. What isn’t debatable is that the Golden Age must include the 90’s.
Yes, although there were still some great films being made in the 2000’s (like There Will Be Blood) but sadly not enough. After that things started turning to shit, and since woke took hold Hollywood has just been a rancid sewer.
although there were still some great films being made in the 2000’s (like There Will Be Blood) but sadly not enough.
Exactly. There's always great films being made, but they're few and far between in relatively more recent times.
since woke took hold Hollywood has just been a rancid sewer
The 2020s is certainly a different kettle of fish, perhaps a real turning point in film history, given that, just from what I've read, there's been a steady clear out of writers and directors who don't fit the necessary 'criteria'. That will spell the end for great films.
reply share