i only care about the opinions of people who knew part one sucked. the acting was a joke. the plot was boring. every actor phoned it in because they had the best actors in hollywood in that movie. it must've been the worst direction ever.
so if you've seen part 2, tell me, was it good?
I thought it sucker. Effects were cool though.
shareyeah it sucked. dannis hates dialouge which is why all the characters just throw out one liners.
shareFirst part was so dull im not evening bothering with party 2, even when free on streaming
shareI thought it was just fine. But it did feel like the first half of a book that just stops.
shareGood effects, okay political plotting, insane use of technology and tactics. Both first and second movie same (and the books too).
sharePart 1 completely sucked.
Lots of slow walking.
Lots of slow talking.
All the battle scenes were done at night to mask the fact that not much of a battle was filmed.
Slow walking into battle.
No worms!
1 worm at the very end and it is filmed at night to hide the bad CGI.
Bland acting.
Bland Sets.
Too much green screen.
Nothing shot on location.
The first movie sucked!
also josh brolin's embarrassingly short limbs. maybe don't film him from far away running because it makes him look like a dwarf. that's 1000% director's fault.
shareHe's definitely no Patrick Stewart. Say what you will about the 1984 Dune, but it's light years beyond this $h!t!
sharebrolin is actually a very compelling actor. i'm just saying the director was bad and it made all the actors in the movie bad too even though they're the best in hollywood right now.
share