All Style no Substance
The movie barely had a story. godawful. avoid.
shareHahaha....another one.
shareFury Road is a masterpiece.
People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs
And the substance is one of the reasons i like the movie that much. The subtext is actually quite dense if one pays attention to it. I found the subtle blend between Nordic cosmogonic folklore with postmodern technophilic esoterism in a nihilistic post-Abrahamic setting to be quite intriguing, if not mesmerizing. Miller created a whole macrocosm with its own mythology, belief system, customs and practices and in doing so added a new conceptual layer to this series creating a rich and fascinating universe.
Besides, i loved the feminism dimension to the movie and in that regard the line "Then, who destroyed the world?!" still resonates quite strongly.
One can agree of disagree with the subtext of the movie, but one can't pretend that there wasn't any.
"WITNESS ME!"
People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs
If you find lack of substance refreshing then good for you. Different strokes for different folks.
I love all your arguments. There's no substance in your comments, so how would you recognize it on screen?
People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs
It's not awful if all you want to see is a crazed chase scene for two hours. Make no mistake, there is NO story here and it's not really a movie. It's a wild action set piece. If that's for you, rent this endeavor. It's well done in that regard. Just don't call it a movie.
shareso you are deciding now what is defined as movie? interesting, but I guess I'll stick to the more common approach...
...but they hung him anyway.
Hanged, Ami. Your father was not a tapestry.
If you paid attention, there is a hell of a story. It is all told visually. It is essentially a silent movie. If you cannot grasp that, that is okay.
No f@cking sh`t lady does it sound like I'm ordering a pizza!
the story if there was one is a load of *beep*
check yourself before you wreck yourself BOI!!
Don't know if i like it or hate it, the silent film aspect. That makes me appreciate it more, And I read that was Miller's original idea for it.
http://lscottpalmer.blogspot.com/
There is quite a lot of story.
1 - In Citadel you've got the haves and the have nots
2 - The military who are brainwashed and drugged up think they are working towards Valhalla, they are being used, this creates relevance and empathy for them
3 - The woman are owned as breeders, a lot of people in this society still want that
4 - A strong female lead who outshines the male lead in nearly every way but he does perform well, a good egalitarian balance overall
5 - Totally badass and great cinematography
6 - Guitarist was very cool
7 - Disllusionment, redemption, development of religion, comfort lies, and courage
This movie had quite a lot of substance, more than I expected.
It was emotionally satisfying, and follows through rather well.
It's not perfect, but few movies are and ultimately it's far superior to the original films.
www.jmberman.com
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
That's poppycock and you know it.
shareYou're poppycock and you know it.
www.jmberman.com
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
Half right! 😋
shareThat's not a story, those are just a collection of tropes. Usually to tell a story, you need character development and to explore themes.
~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.
The story is this: two hardened warriors become redeemed by taking the fight to an evil dictator.
max stopping being selfish and helping those women is not character development?
nuxx realizing the bullshit hes been fed all his life and changing sides to redeem himself is not character development?
furiosa growing some balls and realizing that she needs to fight for a better future and not run away from a bad one is not character development?
maybe if you didnt only consume christopher nolan films you'd notice development that isnt spoonfed to you.
and once again, when people like you bring up the tired old "there's no story" argument (which holds about as much water as the "you didnt understand it" argument with interstellar)
i always tell them this:
young boy and wise old wizard go to rescue a princess then destroy the castle shes been trapped in
THATS LITERALLY THE ENTIRE PLOT OF STAR WARS
one of the biggest classics of all time.
it's a shame that film culture nowadays is so spelled out that people forget that ultimately it's a visual medium and when someone tells a story by visuals rather than dialogue they lose their shit.
Star Wars is about more than that. A young farm boy from nowhere literally saving the galaxy and stopping an evil empire, while learning the wisdom of the force, is pretty triumphant. It draws on mythology and Arthurian legend. Fury Road is just a 3 hour chase scene with a left over plot from Waterworld. I do not care about Max or Furiosa because they have barely any backstory.
~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.
[deleted]
At least no one watched the oscars so maybe we have to warn less and less people off this film from now on. Word of mouth remains bad for a reason.
sharewow three accounts commenting in the same thread? what kind of miserable life do you live megaknocker/wangwang that all you have is coming on imdb to try to trash certain movies by saying the same things over and over and using the same silly strategy of reviving old threads? what a miserable failure you are...
---
http://letterboxd.com/blakkdog/
max stopping being selfish and helping those women is not character development?
maybe if you didn't only consume Christopher Nolan films you'd notice development that isn't spoon fed to you
THAT'S LITERALLY THE ENTIRE PLOT OF STAR WARS
it's a shame that film culture nowadays is so spelled out that people forget that ultimately it's a visual medium and when someone tells a story by visuals rather than dialogue they lose their sh!t
Jim, you left “Self-impressed Pompous Asshole” out of your self-description.
share1) stories in cinema are superfluous
2) the style was the substance
---
You'll never get what you want if you don't know what it is.
by mrdisorder
1) stories in cinema are superfluous
Overrated and terrible
forget art, this is business.
I would testify hand to Bible that this movie should be avoided or skipped if you're a true fan of film. There's just nothing of quality beyond some old school crazed car chases.
shareAgreed
shareAnd the style isn't even that good!
share