Taylor-Joy get naked?
There doesn’t seem to be any other reason to watch this.
shareIt's a PG-13 and it's not 1997 anymore so I doubt it will have a scene like in 'Titanic'.
shareWhat the hell does 1997 have to do with anything?
You saying every man turned gay after that?
Don’t know about you but I sure as hell didn’t.
Also, this monster movie is PG-13?
Then there’s absolutely no reason to watch it.
The hell were they thinking?
What I meant was it's not a PG-13 like Titanic was in 1997 where you got full-on female nudity. Those days are over. I actually thought it *was* an R until I looked it up.
shareGot it. 👍
Tragically, the only nudity you see in PG-13 films these days is bare guy ass.
So though most men aren’t gay, it seems most filmmakers are.
Also, I assumed it was an R too.
Ya, I was watching a TV show 'Prime Target' and yep - gay man's bare ass on screen after gay sex. But not even a side-boob anywhere to be seen. They DID show a woman's hairy armpits tho. A Sad state of affairs we now live in.
shareYeah, remember when The Boys started? There was even a disclaimer saying that there was "sexual content" shown. And the only nudity you saw was that fishguys bare ass... 🙄
shareTitanic got away with it because the nudity was done in a historic/educational movie . Nothing to do with 1997 . I think Schindler’s List had nudity too, yet that one got PG13 as well
share