Lazy, biased and (most importantly) unfunny


Although a fan of Borat (and to some extent, Sacha Baron Cohen) I went into this movie with the full knowledge that it was going to be a one-sided hit-piece on all things 'Trump'
At very least, I expected Baron Cohen to try pull 'something' (anything?) out of the bag, and make me laugh, despite myself......Sadly, not here.

I'm fully aware, that Baron Cohen (and 'Borat' specifically) are quite well known to western audiences, so there's little anonymity to his 'schtick' this time around....but this movie still carried on as if it was all secretly filmed, on-the-hoof film-making (when it clearly wasn't)

Everything here was staged (right down to briefest viginette) and all the (paid) actors and/or onlookers needn't have had to worry about 'corpsing' on camera....because the material here was (worryingly) dire. If this is the best they can do 'scripted', then perhaps Baron Cohen needs to look elsewhere in future?

Nothing (at all) rang true (not even the so-called 'shocked-reactions') This was a stale, lazy and predictable 'hit-piece' and (apart from chuckling slightly at the 'period-gag') the only 'funny' thing about it was the 'agenda' behind it.

Amazon have put this out just before the election (and it shows) The finished product, could have (conceivably) been written, rehearsed, performed, filmed and edited over a wet weekend (it's simply *that* lacking and allround 'meh')

Whereas Baron Cohen once used his 'stereotypical' (albeit, incestuous, fish-out-of-water) foreigner, to (cleverly) prank his prey into revealing their own (real) cultural prejudices/eccentricities....he instead targets the individual (Trump) .....and to a lazier extent, Conservatives and Christianity (primarily, because it's a lot safer than mocking the polar opposite, I guess?)
There was a minefield of material Baron Cohen could/should have used, had he kept it on a level-playing field. Which is a crying shame, because I could envision the (publicity-thirsty) Democrats actually being a lot more susceptible to pranks of this nature....but of course, actual comedy and entertainment take a backseat here, over political bias (and the public are sick to death of celebrity opinions as it is.....even moreso, when it's supposed to be a comedy)

The (oh-so) 'controversial' Rudy Guiliaini sequence was about as forced and staged as everything else beforehand. Employing doubles, inserts and dubbing to pad out the flimsiest of scenes of the former Mayor lying down on a bed to remove his microphone pack.
I hope Guiliaini sues both Amazon and Baron Cohen....which would produce the one genuine laugh from this deeply, unfunny mess (Rounded off by sickening self-advertising from Amazon and a smug Tom Hanks cameo) that'll likely help cement Donald Trump another four years in office.

reply

You do like (brackets) don't (you) :-D

reply

Yes (and dot, dot, dot, dot, dot 'apostrophes' too)

Anyhow (comma) what did 'you' think about the 'movie' (question mark)

reply

(heh heh)...

Heres my thoughts...

Well Borat is seen as one of the funniest comedies ever made, so was unlikely to get close.

And for me it started and ended brilliantly, but definitely wasn't that funny in the middle hour or so. Not bad but not amazing.like the first one was at the time.

The main issue that he was not 'Borat' for much of the movie. The daughter was great though, and their relationship was a surosingly big part of the movie, and it was pretty touching really.

reply

Your review was fine until you started inserting your political bias. I'm sorry you were offended.

But yeah this movie looks pretty bad. The rest of your review is fine and expected. Nothing about it looks fresh or interesting. Even Borat's voice is very different this time and nowhere near as funny as it was in 2006.

reply

(quote) "I'm sorry you were offended"

......Actually, I'm sorry I wasn't offended

What 'political bias' did I insert into said review?
I was expecting Trump to get mocked, I just would have preferred a level playing field, that's all (the audience might have benefitted also?) More targets might have resulted in more laughs (plural)

reply

You were offended clearly. I watched it knowing snowflake conservatives would eb triggered and I was right

reply

It’s tragic seeing Baron Cohen, a comic genius, lower himself like this with obvious political propaganda designed to snipe Trump just before the election.

If you’re in any doubt who to vote for, you should vote Trump on principle in response to this dirty trickery by Cohen and the Leftist cabal who tried to manipulate you with this ‘Borat’ film.

reply

It's terrible the only thing that's probably very controversial is Rudy Giuliani's scene (not funny) but will probably have the social network and media go crazy on him the next few days because if someone like Sacha pulls this out then what will foreign intelligence agents do with the old idiot !

reply

The plastic surgeon doctor was creepy as hell.

reply

To be honest, when looking back on his earlier work, his content was never that intelligent or thoughtful to begin with. He was always making points everybody already agreed with in his films, and for all the balls it must've taken for him to pull the kinda stunts he did, his work didn't really garner much insight into the American culture. In Borat for instance, he was making fun of the pro-war rhetoric many Americans spoke during the time when America was just starting to go to war with the Middle East. Who didn't make fun of those idiots back then?

By comparison, a movie like Team America: World Police, does a much better job portraying hypocrisies on both sides of the political spectrum and offending everyone in equal measure. Matt Stone and Trey Parker will always be much smarter comedians than Sacha Baron Cohen.

reply

Sacha is just repetitive if you watched Ali G you'll find most of the stuff was already done in that show. Other comedians do the same thing they stick to the working formula, but Sacha is failing in being creative about it and his hypocrisy isn't doing him any good either we know who's side he's on even though he's trying to trick us that he's neutral.

reply

If your ground for voting is because you saw a movie you didnt like then you dont deserve a right to vote.

reply

Fortunately that isn’t my ‘ground for voting’. You’d love to deny those who disagree with you the right to vote, that’s the problem.

reply

No, i only want to deny those who are so stupid that they think not liking a movie is a valid reason to choose a party.

reply

Fortunately that isn’t my ‘ground for voting’. You’d love to deny those who disagree with you the right to vote, that’s the problem.

reply

I thought it was pretty funny. I laughed out loud a lot.

reply

It was like going through You-Tube watching SBC videos. Some of them are hilarious and some are just stupid.

reply

First one was hilarious. It’s a shame he became such a boring cliche. Dude used to push the envelope. Now he’s Amy Schumer with a mustache. Wait she has one too.

reply

I should have typed 'Amy Schumer' (it would have been more self explanatory than my long winded review)
That is a much more concise (and accurate) description of this movie (i.e, substituting gross-out shite in the place of 'humour')
Once upon a time, Baron Cohen had a deft knack for combining both....not here (sadly)

reply

It was funny. I laughed out loud which I hardly ever do. Fix your Republican panties you have a wedgie.

reply

STFU, it was HILARIOUS!

reply

I'm aware that 'taste' is subjective, but please feel free to point out 5 funny scenes from this movie?

You've got 96 minutes to choose from....

reply

The baby scene (come on, you have to admit it was funny)
Rudy Giuliani
The fax machine guy (he just faxes, doesn't ask questions)
Mike Pence and Borat pretending to be Trump
Eradicating COVID-19 with a frying pan

I only saw it last night, drunk, and I may have forgotten other scenes.

reply

I laughed once a the 'period' dance sequence.
Personally, I found the 'baby' sequence contrived as soon as she picked the cake and Boat (over-gestured) the payoff line (the alleyway, etc)
The Giulliani scene was heavy edited and contained several re-shoots, body-doubles and re-dubs (after the fact)
The fax-machine guy was *in* on the act (and/or heavily edited)

reply

The fact that you repeatedly say you laughed at the period sequence and nothing else, also shows your type of humour. The period sequence was the crassest part of the movie, so you just were expecting more crass humour. Maybe in the first movie your favorite part was when they were running naked in the hotel?

In addition to this, your clear political bias clouds your judgement.

It's not a movie for you, you should count your losses and move on.

reply

The dialogue with the abortion clinic reverend (what the fuck is a priest doing there in the first place? Is america really that insane?) was probably the funniest part.

reply

-the abortion scene
-the entire introduction
-the buying of a cage scene
-everything related to the daughter in general and the Kazakhstan propaganda book about women.

I mean these are all scenes with multiple funny parts. you want specifics?

reply

The conspiracy theorists telling borat the book is just a conspiracy was a good one.

reply