In the long run has "moneyball" done serious long term damage to Major League Baseball?
I just thought about how "moneyball" may or may not be overrated after reading this:
https://officialfan.proboards.com/thread/597294/2020-thread-operations-suspended-indefinitely?page=33
They were talking about your last point about how to recover on the radio yesterday afternoon about bringing people back.
The HR chase is what brought fans back in 98. That isn't going to work in 2020 because the allure of it is gone. Quck, *without looking*, who lead the league in HR last year? Can you name anyone in the top 3? Most fans can't. So, a big HR chase won't save baseball
Who is the face of the league? Would most people be able to identify Mike Trout if he walked past them at the grocery store?
The average fan cannot and will not be willing to pay asinine prices to attend a 4 hour, 9 inning game.
Nobody is going to follow a 162 game schedule anymore.
Honestly, as much as it "worked" to a degree, Moneyball has done serious long term damage. 6 pitching changes in 3 innings? 4 hour games? Shifts and shifts gallore? The fixation on advanced stats that nobody outside of baseball nerds care about has caused the life to be sucked right out of the game.
Do you agree that the goal of "moneyball" teams like the Oakland A's (or teams like the Kansas City Royals and Pittsburgh Pirates, who take the money they make from baseball and pocket it.) is to simply get to the playoffs by using whatever talent you scrape together & using the best strategies planned? Once those teams get there, they crash and burn against overwhelming might. Simply put, the idea boils down to using math to reach an acceptable ratio of cheap/"good enough". And then the more successful teams like the Yankees and Red Sox have taken the sabremetics aspect of moneyball and actually spent money to keep star players and complement existing rosters with key free agents. share