I saw it I liked it


we dont get original scifi much anymore. at least this wasnt a marvel sequel.

reply

Same here. I also liked the movie.

reply

If "its not a marvelised movie" is now a sign of quality, I feel deeply sorry. The movie has good aspects, without a question, but Edwards can't make movies. The world of the movie does not make sense at all outside the movie and thus stopping the movie from becoming great. It has stunning pictures for sure, but everything else is just worth a Twilight Zone Story. Thats also why the end does not work at all, Twilight Zone/Outer Limits/Black Mirror had cut to black after Nepal, which had been saved the movie the bullshit dream ending.

reply

šŸ¤“

reply

šŸ˜‚

reply

*waits for those that will declare this film actually unoriginal*
Too lateā€¦ no need to wait.

But The Creator aside (props to Gareth Edwards), At LEaSt THiS WasNt a MaRvā€¦. Really? How about that. But I mean yea, if only the majority of films released this year werenā€™t those unkewl cinema snob-disapproved big bad Marvel films.

Oh, if not those films still occupying the minds of their uber kewl detractors, then itā€™s some other unoriginal property thatā€™s reflective of lousy modern Hollywood overall? Well good for you, kewl ones. On that note, damn the latest Saw entry ruled hard šŸ˜Ž

reply

You spent 3 paragraphs saying almost nothingā€¦and yet congratulating yourself on how ā€œuberā€ clever you think you are.

reply

Don't bother. They're a moron.

reply

I also saw it and I suppose I liked it. It was kind of alright. I did feel it was a bit soulless and flat though, like the characters were all rather bland and serious. Also the ending dragged and was rather predictable.

reply

best sci fi since district 9 imo

reply

Yeah it was very good..

reply

I liked it enough to regret not having seen it on the big screen with ear piercing volume šŸ˜”

reply

Overall I enjoyed it, 6/10. The story was interesting enough for me in this early AI world we are in - though it didn't bring anything really new to the table and was pretty predictable.

The thing that was most confusing to me was why the army needed Washington's character at all. They knew where the child was located and then they were all worried about disrupting the local country and don't get caught type of stuff, but then 30 minutes later they are destroying a city with a gigantic tank and "nuking" dozens of other countries. Also, it didn't make sense why Nomad was such a big deal. A large ship, which looked like it could be easily destroyed with a missile, that had some slow gigantic scanner to drop bombs was somehow a game changer in the war?

reply