MovieChat Forums > The Company Men (2011) Discussion > Good movie... but ridiculous.

Good movie... but ridiculous.


The Company Men is a good movie - great performances, strong writing, strong directing, etc... but it does push the bounds of reality to the near extreme.

Losing a job is bad for anyone regardless of your income class. You live according to your means and when your means are lost, your life loses it's crutches and comes crashing down. But the rate in which Bobby Walker's (Ben Affleck) life goes into distress is unbelievable.

Most stable households put savings aside and one would assume that the bigger the income, the bigger the savings. He likely had stock options, definitely had a mortgage, and even had his wife working as a nurse after he was fired. It is completely implausible that so shortly after the end of his severance, they were forced to sell their house (in a crashed economy and real estate market) and that Bobby had to work for his brother-in-law as a carpenter. I mean, I understand the message, but come on... laying it on a little thick?

My mother was part of the big downsizing period of the early-90's and took years to recover, all while raising 3 children as a single parent in the suburbs. Did we have to make cuts? Yes. Did we have to sell our house? Definitely not. John Wells, the writer and director, is certainly not writing from experience. The whole situation, and the plight of the characters, would be more believable if they were earning middle-class income, and lived more paycheque-to-paycheque.

The funniest part is that this movie spent $15 million and earned $4.37 mil at the box office. So even with all the morals and messages, they spent millions on their solid cast and locations, when they could have spent a fraction and got the same reviews/acclaim. Yikes.

reply

I am glad it was a cold, rainy day in Chicagoland, and also early in the morning,when I rented this movie on "on demand". Otherwise, I'd be kicking myself for wasting my time and money too.

Ben Affleck ... what does he know about the reality of the business world? Diddly SQUAT. So he was living beyond his means, what's new about that?

But the idea, presented near the end of the movie, that he would want to do hard manual labor for peanuts, just didn't 'wash'. The only reason that seemed to make sense is that is Ben's own background: working class.
Could his fictional family have been head over heels in debt? Sure. Would he have gone golfing in the mornings before work? Hardly. he was in SALES, not a Sr. VP. (I'm a sr. vp and I do not go golfing, but then I'm a woman, we tend to work harder then men anyway (so sue me I'm a sexist, ;)).

The idea that they could revamp ship building in the USA, WITH the union's blessing, is ha ha never happen land.

The second-to-the-top executive gets laid off by the whore he's sleeping with. Never happen. That guy would have gotten a BIG check to leave that job. He wouldn't have cared about the people under him, except 'in passing'. Blaming his high flying life on his wife, is also bogus. If he had been cheating on her for a long time, yeah, she might have tried to fill the void in her heart with $17000 desks, but it still would have been HIS fault for not being a LEader of his family.

The entire premise was bogus. A 37-year-old SALES guy worried about 20-somethings taking his job, nada da nada as heminway twere wont ta say.

So did they learn their lesson? All of them? No, apparently the 50-something was mentally a 20-something who couldn't figure out how to survive after being booted from his job. That's how the 20-30 somethings 'see' 50 somethings -- as imcompetent. As a 60-something having been working in technology since the age of 12, I have news for you 20-30 somethings. We have lived 30-40 years longer than YOU have and the recession of a couple years ago is about the 5th such recession we've lived through not the first such. We learned how to survive a long time ago. We don't sit in our car and take the easy way out. The guy was an adult. If he couldn't pay tuition for his daughter to go to Brown, hey that's what community college is for. Get over it. I never went to college and yet I made double what the Ben character makes, and more importantly I BANK 3/4's of my pay, drive a 11 year old dented up truck and get to work from home, to boot. Also, I get constant job offers. If a person is really good at what they do, it doesn't matter their age. Also, until last fall I travelled internationally about 70% of the time. It was not a 'strain' on me, so baloney to THAT idea. Someone looks 'terrible' and he's in his 50s? No. He looked his AGE. Hey people it's like buying a steak and not knowing that it used to be part of a living animal. Get back into reality. You don't stay 10 18 25 37 52 forever, you grow and change and you never need to 'step aside' for the recent college graduated (particularly these days when many of those kids are hugely fat with the attention span of a flea, no work ethic, no ethics at all

Well, time for my jog in the local forest preserve, even though it looks like it will be raining in a minute. That's why I always wear my bathing suit under my t-shirt and shorts. Water is just water.
Don't waste your money on this movie, unless it's a rainy, gloomy early morning.

Life is a journey not a destination. Fear nothing.

reply

[deleted]

What savings?....We were living on my ebay sales, my wifes salary, and garage sales... this movie is realistic to the hilt.

reply

[deleted]

His father let's him have it for overspending and lists all the things he bought that were unnecessary.

reply

No so ridiculous. Though the movie didn't touch on this (I wish it had), one of the biggest expenses that comes with being unemployed is a HUGE increase in health insurance costs, especially if some of the family have health problems.
It can all tumble down so quickly.

reply

The higher you fly, the harder you fall. My brother in law WAS a high flyer. He was quite the businessman. But all the smoozing in the world and bargain dealing doesn't mean you'll stay successful forever. Just because you make a lot of money doesn't mean you'll stay rich.

reply

Not sure how off the subject this thread has gotten, but I just wanted to say that the OP is basically right.

If the film had focused on middle class people it would have had more punch. Having a guy who made $160,000 a year and who lived in a house worth a minimum of $850,000 (after the major market crash) and who talked to working class people as if he was totally superior to them may not have been the most effective idea to convey the message.

reply

OP missed the mark...only ridiculous part of the movie is the 'happy' ending, ableit it just shows them attempting a new start...very long shot at being successful in this day and age - especially that kind of industry.

After many years of constant financial growth it was considered somewhat stupid to be financially conservative. I was mortgage shopping in 2006 and had a banker basically tell me that I should go long-term/ARM/balloon payment because the appreciation in value was a better investment than anything else (I didn't go for it)...for many years that philosophy had paid off...

On the other hand, anyone look at what happened to 401k values...even with significant savings, investments took staggering losses.

As some have noted, the lifestyle portrayed is exagerated for a mid-100s level income...irregardless, when the income stops, the lifestyle changes can be extreme.

IMHO the movie overall presented believable scenarios...



reply

look at what happened to 401k values...even with significant savings, investments took staggering losses


Only if the money saved was put into the stock market. I have not suffered and continue not to suffer any losses with my 401k. I have never put a penny of my hard-earned money into speculation. I have preferred to have modest gains, but not a penny has been lost.

reply

If you speak with any broker, they will tell you that many of their clients who made much more money than most people end up spending far more and don't save. This is because they have the mentality that they are rich so they don't have to worry about money. I've seen this myself from co-workers who spent far more than they earned. One day in private one of them told me that if he was fired, he would be about two months away from not being able to pay any of his bills including the mortgage. All his savings was spent traveling, buying gifts for relatives and pretty much showing off.

Also, people who make a lot more money live in areas where expenses are much higher too. Besides the price of real estate, the property taxes themselves can be so high in some parts of the US they are larger than many people elsewhere pay for their mortgage each month. Even though if you drive through these areas they homes and surroundings might not appear to be any different from other areas in the country which cost a fraction for the same thing.

reply

i haven't read the whole thread... but i happen to agree with the OP..

when watching the movie i couldn't help but think that the Affleck character became poor way to quickly... like he said, the bigger you are the more you tend to have put away for a rainy day...

yes, the more one makes the higher one's bills too... fair enough... so it might require selling one's home... but forced to move back into his parents' home?.. sell an Xbox?... that's a bit extreme... they said the house was worth $850K... after selling they must have gotten at least $50K-$100K back... the Porsche was sold (NOT repossessed), so some money there... and then there is unemployment insurance, that i'm sure this guy would get max...

finally, they said he got a 3 month severance package.. that's about $40K right there (based on his $160K salary)... and i think had he taken the deal he was offered when they first told him he was being let go, it would have been 6 months ($80K).. AND i think they mentioned some perks too (like health insurance for a while)...

i would find it hard to believe with $160K salary and a mortgage and a Porsche and country club membership, etc.... that this guy didn't have at least a couple hundred dollars in the bank... if not, this is the most stupid executive that ever existed!

at the very least he could have rented an apartment for his family, since moving in with his parents was something he hated...

the movie sort of left me cold because i have little sympathy for those who are rich and perfectly fine with the corrupt system who look the other way until it affects THEM...

put another way, people who can show up to work late after playing golf, drive a Porsche, have a membership in a country club, a loving understanding family, live in a house almost a million, vacation all over the world, eat in very expensive restaurants,... if someone in that club loses his job and is immediately poor due to hideous financial planning?... oh BOO HOO!

i did relate to the headhunter scene though... the scene where he applies for a position but the headhunter said she already had qualified people for that job and offered another with much lower salary... headhunters are there to help the hiring people and HURT the ones who want employment... since they will often PREVENT people from speaking to the companies they want to work for!

the scene where Affleck shows up a week early to the job interview (and apparently did not go back)... when it is this high paying of a job the company almost always PAYS for the potential employee's plane ticket and hotel stay if required... this is to show the company is successful... AND it would be ridiculous to expect someone out of a job to pay to fly to an out-of-state locations on his dime (since most people don't apply to one place and one place only)... EVEN if he had paid for the first trip, the mistake would prompt the company to pay for the second trip...

the thing most hiring companies (and interviewees) often forget is that the COMPANY is also being interviewed... people turn down companies too!

in any case, I'll reaffirm what the OP said... very well made movie, excellent cast and acting... but it did not make me feel bad for any of its players (accept the ones we never see, the thousands the company laid off who were NOT rich to begin with)...

- It has been said, that to write, is to live forever.... the man who wrote that... is dead! -

reply

You missed the point of the movie then. You are expected to feel bad for people who saved no money and overspent living beyond their means.

Your math is also incorrect because of a false assumption. While his entire compensation might have been $160k for a year, that isn't what he would get as a base salary which was $120k, and that's what a severance package is based on. It doesn't include a bonus or anything else. Plus, in order to carry his health care through COBRA he would have had to pay all of that out of pocket which would be well over $1k a month.

He isn't the most stupid executive, cause he wasn't a real executive. Making a base salary of $120k a year where he was working and living makes him upper middle class. I don't know where you live or what friends you have, but there are plenty of people making six figures who are living on the edge. You don't have to like it, there are real numbers behind this and have been for before the economy went bad.

I don't know where you got this idea that you are expected to have sympathy for all characters in a story. Tony Soprano and Dexter murder people and continue to work outside the law. The concept of the story is to be an observer not have sympathy for them. You have a distorted sense of adult topics if you think you need to have someone to have sympathy for in a movie. The writers went out of their way to make them so. And he learns a lesson at the end, that he can live on less, smaller job and be happy.

reply

"You missed the point of the movie then."


i didn't like the movie... so yeah... i probably missed the point it was trying to make... isn't that usually the case when someone doesn't like something... i DID say it was well done and had excellent acting... i didn't say it was a bad movie... i just can't feel any sympathy for rich people who lose their jobs... which I would need to have to enjoy this movie...

Your math is also incorrect because of a false assumption.


My math is just fine... i based what i said on what i remember them saying in the movie.. when he got the $80K job at the end he said 'i use to make twice as much'...

but not sure your point here... even if it was 'only' $120K that's still $30K severance... and do you think he had ZERO money in the bank... that he spent every single penny when he got his paycheck... or do you think he probably saved some of it... MY point is he should have had enough to last a while..

i've lasted 3 years with zero income... and I wasn't making $120K a year at my last job... i saved a year's worth of salary in 3 years of employment... not planing for the possibility that one might lose one's job in today's world is not very smart... and i would hope executives of major companies would be smart... Affleck's character apparently was not...

"Tony Soprano and Dexter murder people and continue to work outside the law."


Dexter, my favorite show btw, only works PRECISELY because we RELATE to him... not to his past time, but the outcast and faking emotions he must do... Dexter would not work if the audience did not like him...

I don't know where you got this idea that you are expected to have sympathy for all characters in a story."

...
You have a distorted sense of adult topics if you think you need to have someone to have sympathy for in a movie.


so you are trying to dictate to me what i should consider my PERSONAL criteria as to whether i enjoy something or not? just because my criteria is obviously different than yours doesn't make mine 'distorted'...

and not sure what you mean by 'adult topics'... if this is a reference to age, I'm pretty sure I'm older than you are... :)

i would say 'how dare you', but your opinion is not really that important to me... not sure why mine is so important to you...

"The writers went out of their way to make them so. And he learns a lesson at the end, that he can live on less, smaller job and be happy."


and since i didn't relate or sympathize with him, i ended up caring less that he learned a lesson that most people MUST live by without any choice... since almost everybody in the world DOES live on less, with a smaller job than he had, and are happy without the kind of life style he lost!

* * *

as for why i think having sympathy for or relating to a character is typically needed to enjoy a fictitious movie... if you don't care about anyone in the movie, why would you want to spend 2 hours 'with' them?

- It has been said, that to write, is to live forever.... the man who wrote that... is dead! -

reply

Incredible, Peteroid. You are as thick as a brick. You are one of those people who speak just to hear their own voice. Welcome to my ignore list.

reply

"Incredible, Peteroid. You are as thick as a brick. You are one of those people who speak just to hear their own voice. Welcome to my ignore list. "

if closing your ears is how you avoid those who you don't agree with... i am more than happy to be part of your ignore list.

i would have preferred you point out what i said that you believe is incorrect, and argue why you think this way. guess it IS easier to stop paying attention then it it is to argue an opposing point of view...

oh well, to each his own... you haven't contributed to the discussion at all... so I'm sure I'll get along just fine without you listening... :)

- It has been said, that to write, is to live forever.... the man who wrote that... is dead! -

reply

I don't know where you live or what friends you have, but there are plenty of people making six figures who are living on the edge.


yes... they are called people who don't have very good planning skills... i'll counter with there are people who get by on $20K/year...

isn't it interesting how the people who get paid less have to be smarter than the people who get paid more to survive? food for thought...

- It has been said, that to write, is to live forever.... the man who wrote that... is dead! -

reply

If I was making $100/year, even for 5 years, I'd be rich, I wouldn't have to work, My children wouldn't have to work...really, If you turn out poor after earning so much, it's noone else's fault.

reply

Actually this did happen to me. I had lots of money saved up too. I lived frugal. This was in 2005. 18 months later, I sold everything I had, and had to take a job teaching english in Korea at one fifth my former salary. I had been an IT consultant - I designed manufacturing systems at a dozen fortune 500 firms (and nearly as many small firms as well, and in other environments beside manufacturing, such as telecom, health care, pharamceuticals, higher ed, etc...). I was good at my craft. It used to take only three phone calls for me to get a new consulting gig. During the down time of 1991, a similar thing happened. I barely survived. It took one year to get a new full time gig. At one point, I had a temporary gig that paid me when I was down to $58. I used the bounty of the Clinton years to enhance my academic credentials. That left me with hefty college loan debt. At first, that didn't hurt me. Later it did.

In 2005 and 2006, I sent out 970 resumes. I got 3 returned contacts: one in Ireland, one by an Indian firm in central Pa., and one by a "recruiter" in Nigeria. I attempted working at fast food, and retail, but they didn't want someone in those roles with a doctorate from a tier one university, when they could hire hispanics who saw those roles as gainful employment.

What ruined thing for me was: I turned 45 in 2005 - and insurance actuarial tables say I'm a bad bet, even though I work out 4 times a week, lift weights and can run three miles in 30 minutes, still; H1B visas flooded the markets I sold my talents in... and demand was already collapsing by the last half of 2005 so firms weren't investing in new IT development. Thank you Republican party for staunchly standing by a destructive health insurance system, raising H1B visas every time the market started to tighten up (and I could literally feel this happening), and supply side economic policies in a demand deficient environment. f

For three years in Korea I kept up on all my debt obligations, but after the recession kicked in, Korea's currency fell 40%, and then I had to declare bankruptcy, but nicely, I still owe on my college loans. You cannot fathom this kind of mess.

What happened in this movie is very very very very real. I mean spot on. Let me tell you. Though I didn't have the access to such great outplacement facilities. What they tell you in outplacement facilities is exactly what is going on in this film. And everything else is the same. The hope on a slender job lead that leads to nothing. The wish to be dead, the desire to be dead, the sense of betrayal, the hopelessness of not even being able to earn a stick of gum, the shame, the humiliation, the absurdity of being good at your craft and not being able to find work, the fact that none of the people around you notice any change at all while you are losing everything and you life is falling apart right before your very eyes.

The ruining of lives... My life was destroyed. In fact, if I had more moral courage, I would have killed myself, but I am, in fact, a coward that way. After returning from Korea, I took manual labor jobs, one, such as one of the characters did here, it was back breaking hard, but I was happy for the employement as I love to work but I eventually had to let it go in favor of something else as I feared it was starting to giving me signs of a hyrnia like symptoms and I have no health insurance, and there were tons of other bangs and bruises - this is the kind of work I did while in college and just after college to make some scratch - I found out the hard way, I'm not that young anymore despite the fact I work out. Right now, I work at a call center. Two weeks ago, they announced that our pay was dropped from $10 an hour to minimum wage ($7.25). I have a Law Degree now, so I'm also studying for the bar, while I work, while I look for gainful employment. This is just a huge Godawfulmess.

This film is spot on realistic in the effects, especially moral and emotional, of employment loss. The inputs, the cause and effect, might be a little off - but this is a motion picture, an art form that has to go over the top, and hit people on the head, in order to illustrate the point: the guy goes from driving a Porsche and living in a McMansion, to driving an old used chevy and living with his parents (he had lots of family support I don't have: family, parents, brother-in-law, etc... - in my family, My parents lost all their money to stock market, and live slenderly off of social security, my other family members just as soon wish I disappear, and even though I'm the only educated member of my family, they treat me like I'm a cashier at a truck stop).

I found this movie fascinating to watch, because if was exactly a repeat of the horrors I experienced. Seven years later, and my life is still miserable. I pluck onward - like being born, there isn't any other choice. I see horrible things happening to people around me everyday, such as ALL the workers losing 30% of their salary where I work - most of those people don't have my training or experience. I believe something decent can still happen to me. Though I'm 52, I look like I might still be in my late 30s - so it's possible that by the time an interested company finds out my real age, it will be too late for them to not hire me.

I'm sorry my friend. This movie doesn't replicate my experience perfectly, but it is a movie ... that means its an abstraction from reality, abstracted to make a point. In reality, my experience is much, much worse than this movie. One year or so later, two of the guys still live, and find that they have hit their floor. I still haven't found my floor yet... seven years hence. Welcome to America, have a nice day.

reply

Is this post serious?

You say -

What happened in this movie is very very very very real. I mean spot on.


then you say-
This movie doesn't replicate my experience perfectly, but it is a movie ... that means its an abstraction from reality, abstracted to make a point. In reality, my experience is much, much worse than this movie


So this movie isn't very very very very real. Especially if it's an abstraction from reality. Reality IS reality. Abstraction is not.

Also, you say you have a law degree while making $7.25 hr (once was $10) at a call center. You also say you have a doctorate. Yet (at the time of your posting) you could not find work. Something smells fishy about your story.

2014: Whiplash, Cold in July, that Terrence Malick project set in Austin

reply