Put a chick in it?
Make it a musical too, and want it lame.
WHat were they thinking?
I mean it could have been ok to make a movie with both Joker and Harley - Harley is an interesting character in the comics. But Gaga with her plastic face and wooden acting is the last person I want to see as Harley - its obvious she paid for this entire movie, otherwise why would anyone want to hire her. Whoever told Gaga she is an actress?!! Also a musical?? Why?? I am waiting for Joker heist movie, not this courtroom musical gaga crap.
share100% agreed, there were so many cool ways to expand from the first movie, so many creative possibilities, but adding Lady Gaga and shoehorn this into a Musical because of course Lady Gaga just sounds horrible.
shareShe is not even in 25% of the movie.
share25% way is too much
shareWhat are you basing this off of? You haven’t seen the film yet.
Several critic reviews I’ve read say she’s good and steals the show. Guess “we’ll” just have to wait and see (no pun intended).
Critics? Critics say lady gaga steals the show? really? is this rage-bait?
share[deleted]
He's not basing it off of anything, he's just a misogynistic asshole who has issues with powerful women being in movies. He has a whole other thread with the same title "Put a Chick In It" for Furiosa which is the backstory of the female character from the previous Mad Max movie. He's a pathetic troll, just ignore him.
share$200 million budget as well, no wonder they’re trying to keep the fact that it’s a musical from the trailers.
share
Put a bint in it for the modern audiences, and fuck it up.
Embrace the madness!
share