MovieChat Forums > Inside Man (2022) Discussion > unwatchable woke propagenda

unwatchable woke propagenda


Am 30 min into the first episode and it's already too much.
Every (white ) man is an asshole, every 'minority' is a good guy.

- the asshole in the train
- the senator (wait fat phobia here !)
- the priest is of course a pedo, and is protected by the vicar.

I mean come on, the only exception is a killer in jail, rofl.

The first scene in the train is particularly hilarious.
It is totally unrealistic scene with the white guy, but they couldn't depict a realistic one with a "minority" assailant.

It has reached a point where it has become completely comical really.

reply

Every minority is a good guy? Dillon? Yes, Dillon's a great character and his repartee with Grief is one of the highlights of the show, but Dillon is a black guy who is an unrepentant, creepy serial killer who eats parts of his victims. But every minority is a good guy?

Did you watch long enough to see Grief get the plucky, young reporter to reveal herself to be more of a selfish jerk than she pretends? To see the female tutor become an icy manipulator?

You've also glossed over how likeable Grief is despite his horrific crime, as well as how self-sacrificing, well-intentioned, and honourable the vicar is in the face of extremely bad circumstances.

I will grant you that the repetition of the phrase "me too" on the train was a bit hamfisted.

However, I think your read on this show is quite off. It doesn't strike me as a propaganda piece at all.

reply

"You've also glossed over how likeable Grief is despite his horrific crime, as well as how self-sacrificing, well-intentioned, and honourable the vicar is in the face of extremely bad circumstances."

Please, the vicar attacked, pushed down the stairs, then sequestrated an innocent math teacher in his cellar, all that to protect a pedophile.
And that's the best white man on the show, you just made my point.

reply

The vicar tries everything in his power to protect his son, family, and a suicide risk in his congregation. We see the portrayal of the vicar differently. His primary motive, don't forget, is protecting his son from Janice wrongfully accusing Ben of paedophilia. Also, this might be a minor point, but he doesn't attack Janice. He tries to prevent her from leaving until they can talk and he can be assured she won't ruin his son's life. He doesn't push her down the stairs, either, as these circumstances are largely accident.

Now, if your complaint was about the scene's writing, I'd agree. I didn't like that scene, but mostly because it was contrived that Janice wouldn't take five minutes to talk sensibly, and that the vicar would bar her way so completely or wouldn't call an ambulance after she fell. But that's dummy plot writing, not an anti-white male PSA.

Even leaving the vicar aside, you've still left out everything else I said contrary to your point about the self-righteous journalist being called out on her smugness (you ignored that), Grief being likeable (ignored that), Dillon being a monster (ignored), Janice being manipulative and ignoring her long-time friend's pleas for help (ignored), and the other women on the show portrayed as mean (ignored).

reply

Well of course I exaggerated a little bit, some non white characters can have flaws in the show.
But the general tone is very strong, the white man, is the enemy : he is either a weak pedo, a powerful rapist, a public misogynist harasser, a killer on death row, or a vicar sequestrating an innocent woman in his cellar (whatever you say sorry that's the facts).

But am sure it gets way worse after that episode, but I can't watch the rest, sorry am sick of it.

reply

I just disagree with your assessment. Grief is one of the protagonists, and although he has a horrible crime in his past, he also cops to it. The warden is a nice guy who wants Grief to do more good in the world and is bummed out that he's just accepting death. The vicar is, in my opinion, presented in a good light, just fighting rotten circumstances. And, again, white men aren't the only nasty people.

You could just as easily go through the female characters and find flaws. Again, Grief directly forces the reporter character into admitting she cares more for her lurid, gossipy stories than her friends, which is a pretty horrid revelation, and Janice is - in my opinion - a really nasty piece of work who won't hear her friend out, is fully prepared to ruin somebody's life on a misunderstanding (that she refuses to follow up on), and is generally so full of spite that at some point in the show I started to think of her as more of a villain than guys like Grief. Also, the vicar's wife is just as guilty as he is of kidnapping and holding Janice against her will.

An aggregate of the plotlines and character moments on the shows does not show a pattern of anti-male, anti-white propaganda.

reply

Anyone reading this can just watch the first episode and judge for themselves.

reply

I think it might just be us reading this. Maybe UncleRuckis down there skimmed our back-and-forth.

reply

The only black guy on the show is a cannibal??? He's arguably the worst person on the show.

The people that scream "woke" on this site are just ridiculously full of shit morons.

reply

Some stuff is made as a commercial for an ideology or a political movement, and that stuff is obnoxious, but I really don't see how Inside Man qualifies.

My problem isn't with people identifying woke material that sacrifices good writing for soapboxes and strawman arguments, my problem is that any progressive ideas or non-white characters *at all* seems to have people frothing and accusing the show/movie of being agenda-driven. Some stuff just is about women or has progressive themes in it. Doesn't make it bad or propaganda in and of itself.

reply

Agree completely.

reply

Thank you.

reply

If you didn't watch the rest of the series, then it's good you didn't get to see Ben's girlfriend, Lucy. Well, I guess.

reply

Ya - the Indian GF definitely put it over the top

reply

I think the world has left the OP behind. What the right is calling “woke” is just reality.

reply

Priest? Edgar wasn't a priest, he was a verger, who is like a caretaker.

reply

The OP is 100% correct and anyone trying to defend this first episode is part of the problem.

The entire train sequence plays out like some woke wet dream, no human beings in this scene even remotely act or react in anyway that would resemble reality as we know it.

The scrawny white bully acts as if he has some white privilege bubble surrounding him, no human being would ever act this way in 2022, it’s so over the top that it’s almost comical.

The female journalist is not able to stand up to a scrawny 90 pound man-child? She’s a grown up, he looks like a teenager, did I miss something? This isn’t the 1930’s, had this interaction played out in real life the woman would have stood up and kneed the dweeb in his balls, dropping him to the floor.

Not a single stranger says anything while this is playing out? I call BS on this, I could see if there was an entire biker gang with switchblades harassing the female reporter, but one scrawny dude? Haha, like I said, it’s like a woke wet dream.

Then the cherry on top, the bully asks that woman for her phone, and instead of telling him “to go F*%# himself” she starts shaking in her boots and just hands over her phone? Get the hell out of here.

The writers and director must think that we are idiots, are we really supposed to believe that this is what toxic masculinity looks like? Get the hell out of here.

Oh and this mini series sucks by the way, turned it off halfway through episode 2 as the writing was laughably bad and contrived. Stanley Tucci deserves better than this.

reply

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

reply

Theres always one .

Dont the feed the ( rasict bigoted kkk-wannbe asswipe ) troll folks

He wont be back to answer your retorts to his insane ranting

reply