Rehash my ass
This might not be good, but that criticism - which was made based purely off the trailers - had no merit. I'm not even sure if the new ideas are why the movie is so bad, but it's definitely not a copy of the original.
shareThis might not be good, but that criticism - which was made based purely off the trailers - had no merit. I'm not even sure if the new ideas are why the movie is so bad, but it's definitely not a copy of the original.
shareI guess others see it differently. I never claimed it was a full ouy remake... only that it remake many scenes completely, wasting story time. Hell, the first couple minutes I've watched so far, did exactly that: the exact same start as the original. Is that creative and amazing? Not in the slightest.
I'll watch it because of my friend, but not looking forward to it. Even some fights in the trailers looking poorly edited. Like they didn't want to hurt each other
Of course. In terms of how it reinvented itself and built itself on the past...it was exactly what I was expecting/hoping the film would accomplish.
(My own evaluation of the movie notwithstanding, however.)
just saw it. SO MUCH was a redo from the first movie. i wont even go into details. was a retread. so tired of this kind of thing. MAJOR MAJOR plot actions were the exact same as the first matrix movie.
re-run
Honestly, T2 was more of a retread of T1 than this was. It's a quasi-remake. But that's obviously acceptable.
I don't mind agreeing to disagree in general, but frankly on this front, I'm hard-pressed to take seriously any evaluation that concludes this film to be a lazy retread.
If one is concluding that genuinely, I can't help but feel that either one of two things happened: a person has limited their scope of what an interesting story can be, or a person isn't really taking the film seriously enough. There are some excellent stories that rely on retreading in this manner. And dismissing this is a retread is extremely short-sighted. (Like the people getting mad because they claim that in this movie, "it made Trinity the One".)
some groups grew up used to retreads, others dont put up with it
sharelol, no one's "used" to retreads. It's a very uncommon storytelling technique, and still is.
edit: anywho, I'm oscillating on how I'm using the word. I'll just leave it at that since it looks like you have no idea what I'm talking about.
Now these dopes are all "I NEVeR SaID iT WaS a REhaSh!"
shareDon't put up with it, BAHAHAHAHA! You think this is some kind of cause. If anything, this just shows how biased you are. We're not "used to retreads", you're just so paranoid about them you come out swinging before you even know it's a retread. Then, you come back saying you never said it was a retread, only to return to the same conversation saying it is, LOL!
shareHmmmm this is a thread about matrix, not T2.
shareSeeing as how the Analyst was trying to outdo the Architect, the one who created the 6th version of the Matrix we see in the previous trilogy, a rehash is expected with the 7th version of the Matrix.
This wasn't at all like The Force Awakens-A New Hope photocopy like we got a few short years ago.
Precisely. The repeating is intrinsically part of the story.
Again, not saying it's a good story, but to dismiss this as a lazy retread is hugely is extremely unfair and superficial.
It definitely wasn't a rehash, or in any way a remake/reboot/whatever. I don't like it as much as I do the original three, but it certainly has its moments, and it holds up well. This film is better than many of the other decades-later revisits we've seen to old franchises of late.
shareI thought it was awful and I thought the trailer looked great. There are a lot of sequels made after the original I would watch before this movie.
But it's not a rehash. It's a bogus argument.
The reason it's getting criticized it's exactly because it's not like the previous movies. Which some see as a good thing and others as a bad thing.
I, for one, liked the social criticism that people have become obsessed with trying to recreate the past