MovieChat Forums > Skyfall (2012) Discussion > Is Christopher Nolan enough to save the ...

Is Christopher Nolan enough to save the Bond franchise at this point?


This movie was the start to the series coming back off the rails - Specturd finished the job. Is Nolan enough to get the series back on track?

reply

He would make a great Bond director and he clearly loves and respects the Bond franchise as he references it quite often in his films, but the thing is I think directing a Bond film is beneath Nolan, he is on a whole other level of film making.

A franchise that is in bigger trouble is Star Wars

reply

Lmao...

reply

I'm confused, what is funny about this?

reply

[deleted]

Not at all if anything he's underappreciated.

reply

[deleted]

Well I'll admit that Dunkirk and Tenet were a little disappointing, everything before that however was top notch. The man still hasn't made a bad movie.

reply

[deleted]

EXCUSE ME!? nolan is beneath Bond! Beneath a REAL Bond that is, so that excludes daniel "no Bond" craig.

reply

Naw Nolan is too good to direct a Bond film although he’d be damn good at it

reply

Take ALL Bond movies (except those fake ones with daniel "no Bond" craig), get 5 random minutes out of every one of those movies, add them together in random order, then reverse the whole lot and voila!, you've got a nolan Bond movie. Now you can show everyone what an incredibly smart guy you are by saying that you understand the story!

reply

[deleted]

I'd say there are some other directors I'd give a crack to. James Mangold would be incredible.

I'd really beg Martin Campbell to come back for the next Bond. He is the kind at starting new actors in the role. I don't care he's in his late 70s.

reply

Personally I’d love a Tarantino Bond movie featuring Pierce Brosnan as an Older more distinguished bond

reply

I always thought they didn't do enough showing other 00 agents. It was cool when they showed one die in Octopussy and, of course, Alex in Goldeneye.

Something like a new Bond movie where a current Bond is hunting an old 00 that turned traitor and has to use another retired 00 that was close to the traitor when they worked for MI6 to help stop him.

reply

Pierce as the villain!

reply

I would say let him try and do something original. It's time for Bond to move on from Craig though. Maybe try and retread back to the more comical style of the first few decades of the Bond films. Something modern audiences haven't seen in a while. Or maybe it's just a time to try and take a break for a while.

reply

There is not a single nolan movie worth watching and the Bond franchise was utterly destroyed by barbara broccoli and her feminazi agenda and daniel "no Bond" craig trying to act someone he shouldn't be.

The Bond franchise is beyond saving, and CERTAINLY by someone like christopher "always the same trick telling a story back to forth" nolan.

reply

Nolan has made phenomenal films such as Memento, The Dark Knight, Inception, and Dunkirk. I find Dunkirk to be a little overrated but that film got a best picture nom just like Inception, as well as earning Nolan his first best director nom. So how are those films not worth watching?

As for the Bond franchise, Craig is regarded as one of the best Bonds and changed the game with Casino Royale, and Skyfall was fantastic as well. Craig's first outing, Casino Royale pretty much saved the franchise instead of destroying it especially coming after Die Another Day. The guy actually gave us the Bond that was most faithful to Ian Fleming's vision of the character. He was dark, badass, and this cold assassin which is what James Bond is supposed be.

reply

I don’t want to see him make something this big. Something smaller would be better.

reply

A non-linear, time travelling Bond movie shot out of sequence. I'm good.

reply

With unintelligible dialogue and to loud a soundtrack.

reply

Ha ha 😂

reply

“to” instead of “too,” yet you claim to be a doctor.

reply

I never thought he was enough to save anything.

reply

The fight choreography in Nolan's films, and his and his brother's script writing is dog shit, so no.

reply

Don't know why I'm replying to this since this topic was years ago & Nolan has been taking out of the running by Eon Productions likely due to his creative control requirements. I still vehemently disagree with your take. For Bond-level action, you need to view some of the marvelous work on Inception. Remember, directing is about the big picture... the setpieces, and Nolan has always demonstrated a certain affinity with Bond-esque spectacle whether that was homage or not—it's not always clear. But he loves the shit, and definitely knows his shit. He's great with the little nuggets of humor, too, as can be found in Memento and The Prestige. I have no doubt he would, theoretically, make a stunning & original picture... one for the history books.

The quick-edit shaky-cam fight choreography in the Batman films of his was a stylistic choice to make it seem like the goons were taken out by the shadows or the night, and it was also a hip technique in the 00s regardless. Also, used in Quantum of Solace and the Bourne movies. I don't like it either, but I think we've all moved on from that. It's rarely used now.

I would imagine Nolan would take it back to it's roots with a 50s or early 60s period spy thriller that's on par with Connery's best, faithful to Fleming, but also with a hint of emotionism and scope like that found in On Her Majesty's Secret Service. The non-linear storytelling will be kept at a minimum for once... akin to the opening scene of Casino Royale being flashback. The best part about it probably would have been his casting. It sure would have been nice to see Tom Hardy in the role for a one-off back in his prime. Maybe his Bond villian could be sinister trannie played by "Elliot" Page... as I sure as hell would never want to see her as a Bond girl any longer. Marion Cotillard and Emily Blunt, sure, but not Ellen.

reply

The series does need to go back to its Cold War roots. A nice span of retro movies reminding the world how awful the Soviet Union and Mao's China really were is precisely what audiences need.

reply

You're obviously a big Nolan fan. Good for you. I think he's overrated. He's definetly one of the best filmmakers around right now but that says more about the lack of talent behind the camera over the last twenty years in general.

His fight choreography is awful. Nothing to do with his filming techniques. I'm talking about how slow and boring they are to watch and how often people are literally waiting around to be hit - see The Dark Knight Rises. And the fight scenes in Batman Begins didn't have shaky cam anyway. It was just quick edited cuts to the point where you could hardly comprehend what had happened.

And again, Nolan's great with ideas, imagination, and I admire him for using practical effects but the writing in his films is often terrible and constantly beats you over the head with exposition.

reply