"Why don't they just chop up his body into tiny pieces? Its only logical."
People used to ask that about Jason Voorhees, too.
They actually do that and people still get get pissed off and bitch and moan.
Oh well, can't please everyone. Sucks.
I completely agree
shareI still think they should have had 4 raccoons eat the remains, then scattered those 4 coons to the corners of the earth, but either way, you know.
shareI think the majority of complaints are about Michaels portrayal and lack of screen time. The ending would have felt much more epic had it not felt like a quick after thought just to get rid of Michael.This was a movie about Laurie and Cory. Michael was just a background character hanging around.
shareWhile it is true that it was a weird strange movie, it wasn't that bad.
shareI think, much like Season of the witch, it would have been received better if it had been a stand alone film outside of the Franchise or advertised as a spin off. Unfortunately the way they did it left a lot of people feeling cheated. They advertised a Michael Myers film and just didn't deliver.
shareEspecially for the supposed end to a trilogy. I thought it was going to be slasherific. It's definitely not what was advertised on the tin.
shareIt was weird and strange. It wasn't even really a slasher. It was like a mystery/drama. I actually liked it for that. Probably cause it kinda came out of left field. I kept thinking that Cory was going to end up being crazy, and that he imagined/hallucinated Michael the whole time. I would not have liked that.
shareIt had nothing to do with how Michael died, it was more of "what the heck was that long boring Corey storyline that lead no where" doing taking up 90% of the movie?
shareOP is just building and fighting straw men because she can’t defend the stupidity of the final movie in a trilogy being about a completely new, derivative wannabe.
shareAmen. Jason got chopped up into 23 pieces in Part IV. Then when he was no longer the killer, people got pissed off, bitched, and moaned. So then they did a total retcon, then everything after that was shit shit shit and more shit.
ETA: My comment was only about the Jason part of your post as I didn't watch this garbage so I can't comment on that particular garbage.
My favorite Jason/Friday The 13th movie happens to be Part 6. I like how it's more of an action movie and we get this big Tommy Jarvis vs. Jason thing throughout the movie. You don't really get that in the other Friday The 13th movies. It's just Jason stalking/killing random people for 90 minutes or so and ends with some Jason vs. final girl chase/showdown and they don't really have any connection with each other. Plus Tommy accidentally brings Jason back to life, so he trying to fix a problem he started. So I like that too. And that kind of ties into the whole Tommy vs. Jason thing I mentioned. I almost want to say that Part 6 is a revenge movie, but I don't really know if that's the right way to put stuff. Maybe a revenge gone wrong since when Tommy goes to make sure Jason is really alive and wants to fully get rid of the body, he ends up accidentally bringing Jason back to life and then has to fix stuff, which leads to some final showdown and Tommy facing his fears and trauma Jason caused. I kind of feeling like I'm looking too deep into the movie, especially since it's a slasher movie, but really, all this came to me almost instantly when watching the movie. I didn't really dissect the movie. I just put it on one day because I was doing a Friday The 13th marathon, and as I was watching, all these things came to me instantly. My brain/thinking process does that sometimes.
shareIt's ok to look deeper into it. That's what movie discussions are supposed to be for.
If you look closer at Part VI and Part V and dissect them, you will see that Tommy Jarvis was supposed to be the new killer. But because people whined and cried and bitched and moaned that Jason wasn't the killer anymore (Part V was a quasi-reboot of the OG), they completely struck down that whole great setup and retconned the whole thing. So everything after Part V is illegitimate and non-canon in my book because Jason was no more and Tommy completely mentally disintegrated and dispatched the final girl and was set to continue the franchise as the new killer. There was nothing for him to dig up because Jason didn't exist anymore. He was dust. They did a total retcon in Part VI.
But what’s the point of having a completely new killer? Start a completely different franchise or a spin-off of the franchise. If The Simpsons season 52 is about a completely new family we’ve never met before, that would go down like a lead balloon and rightfully so.
shareBut what’s the point of having a completely new killer?
No shit. Everyone knows that. The point is people go to see Halloween for MM, Friday for Jason, and Nightmare for Freddy and there’s nothing wrong with that.
shareSo why ask what the point was of them doing it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
shareLady, are you soft? Reading comprehension skills? Maybe stick to conversations with emojis only. It’s okay to say “I don’t know.”
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.”
https://i.ibb.co/3c7187J/ezgif-1-ec46b4aef0.gif
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
No one can ever be happy. Same thing with The Dark Knight Rises and The Batman.
Everyone complained there was barely any Batman in TDKR and too much Bruce Wayne, but then we get The Batman and everyone complains WAY too much Batman and not enough Bruce Wayne.
That's part of why I just shake my head and laugh at these stupid "reshoot Halloween Ends" petitions going on.