I'll see it For Mel


Terrible poster and the trailer looked generic and kinda cheap but I love Mel so I'll check it out when it's available digitally.

reply

Its terrible

reply

I agree,

After 10 minutes i started doing something else while watching it, and after 30 minutes i stopped watching it all together.

reply

Yes it was. I'm surprised Mel agreed to do this pos.

reply

Yes, it's really not good. Shame too, because I like a lot of the cast. I am surprised the three leads agreed to do this one.

reply

I like Mel Gibson. Great actor and he did a great job in this but any way you look at this its a C grade direct TV flick. Poorly made, shot in one location, cheapie. Im sure Gibson shot his part in 48 hours earning $1 mill per day.

reply

I love that he's embraced his older, curmudgeon side. He was fantastic in Blood Father. I guess he did this for the $1 mil a day, but the guy is worth $400+ million. Maybe he needed another boat...

reply

Or just do it for fun! I think he looks good for his age. Its sad Hollywood is still keeping this guy blacklisted

reply

As low budget as the poster looked. I'm hoping Mel just did this for a friend. Good villain role for David Zayas. That's about all I have to say about it.

reply

Lots of negativity in this thread but I thought it was decent. Not especially good, but not terrible either.

It's an okay straight-to-video action-thriller that's somewhat elevated by the extreme weather element.

reply

Don't watch it if you are only planning on seeing it for him. He's only in it for like 15-20 minutes at most, although he's good when he's on screen. Other than that it's a horrible B-movie.

reply

I did end up watching it for Mel, he was good but the movie was pretty horrible, a waste of time really.

reply