I've seen 2 Coen movies now and they were both pretentious piles of *beep*

How can the critics garble up this pretentious, and more importantly, POINTLESS *beep*

Both movies I've seen from them now (No Country for Old Men being the other) are complete trash.

They each have a bunch of scenes that could be completely removed and take away NOTHING from the film.

They even more scenes that could be shortened and take away NOTHING from the film.

They have characters that could be removed, and take away nothing.

Subplots that could be removed, and take away no enjoyment.

In fact, they should have just never made the movie.

For some reason in this industry if you try to make your characters as unlikable as possible, your plot as pointless as possible, and your ending anti-climatic as possible, critics will just suck your *beep* through a straw and call it ambrosia.

It was just completely unlikable in every way.

Seriously, *beep* all of you.