Any Pro-Life Atheists/Agnostics?

[deleted]

pro-life and i'm not concerned about religious-related things...

if women who had abortions only had them when they were raped or from an incestual relationship (which is basically another form of rape if it involves a father and his minor daughter, then a huge portion of the 1 million+ abortions would go down. over 20% of pregnancies end in abortion. i'm not sure if abortion could really be fully illegal because of concerns about rape and incest though. rape/incest may only count for 1% of abortions so abortions could just be a whole million less. i do think that those who are raped can just put the baby up for adoption though, but except for rape, these people having sex know what can happen. even for teenagers, they're at a healthy age to be pregnant, like in the past young teens used to commonly have children, and they even know a pregnancy can happen from having sex.

people having sex should know that contraception isn't perfect (no contraception says that it is) and that sex can lead to pregnancy and sexual intercourse is the only way a pregnancy can happen, so if people were really avoiding a pregnancy then how can it be true if they're doing the one thing that causes it? that's why, unless you're raped, there is no such thing as an unwanted pregnancy if someone is having sexual intercourse. even with protection, a pregnancy can still occur. although a couple is really trying to lessen a chance of a pregnancy, they're still intentionally putting that possibility at risk. for something as serious as the creation of a human life, it's only ingornace that would call a pregnacy unexpected. was a pregnancy that was a result of sexual intercourse really that unexpected? how can a pregnancy be disturbingly unwanted when a couple was intentionally having intercourse, which can lead to a pregnancy?

many people have little family values, little relationship values and little sexual values and abortion is only a result of a breakdown on these values..people have many choices before a pregnancy, like the person you're having sex with, the relationship situation you're having sex in, your life situation that you're having sex in (which can involve age, money, work/school, etc), the type of sex you're engaging in (intercourse, the only method that can cause pregnancy, as compared to oral sex, anal sex, masturbation, bondage, other kinky things), to discuss consequences with a partner or not, and to use protection or not, and except for some laws involving a minor, no other laws involve many of these choices, so the only law pro-life people are basically "anti-choice" about is abortion, which shouldn't even be considered a logical choice and people have so many choices to make before that situation. and of course once a woman is pregnant, then other choices can be made, like how involved the father will be (which obviously he should want to be automatically) and how together the couple wants to be, and poor choices like the father not wanting to deal with it can lead to an increase chance in abortion. if people made better decisions about sex, then abortions and pregnancies in non-committing relationships would happen a lot less

obviously, at conception, there's a new individual cell with its own unique DNA that no one will have ever again. and what's more is that all human beings have been this unique individual cell and that we've all been unborn children. how can we say an embryo isn't as alive when we've been that too? how can a woman be allowed to end her unborn child's life when it's most likely she was basically putting herself in a possible situation to get pregnant? her own child? although many people don't want to get pregnant when having sex, they know it can happen and really should take that seriously. in modern times, sexual desires are of more importance than a possible child's life, and unfortunately laws help support these backward values. just because a woman views her own child as unwanted shouldn't give her the right to terminate him/her.