Sin City - Bad guy is a huge black man. Dies horribly, corrupt cop that gunned down Marv female friend black.
The Spirit - Gets rid of Ebony White, one of the few black characters from the comic. True he was a pretty much offensive when first concieved but could be remade for the modern day. Because he felt he had no place in the story. Replaces him with a main black bad guy who dresses like a Nazi.
Just saying, maybe he has issues. You know like the whole whores, whores, whores thing and noir style badass talking about the city thing. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Maybe you should get out and experience life in the real world, rather than sit around reading comics, watching movies and bïtching about your stupid racism theories. See, in the real world, racism is still a real issue and it's an issue that needs attention. Go be productive and proactive instead of wasting everyone's time (including your own) on IMDb forums.
Sirius. I've heard people from New Jersey, NYC, and Philly say he's a big racist, and a @sshole to boot. It's hard not to see the connections. But it won't make a big deal because there are many other racists in Hollywood and real life. So he'll get a pass.
But Gail in Sincity was a symptom of his mental thinking. A powerful black women who made her living as a whore. An amazon who submits her power and self to a man for money.
Powerful women brought low to the will of men via their weakness.
Acording to Frank. I mean look at 300 , the Alpha Spartan wife had to bend over to the will of a lesser man because to Frank the only power of a women is in her sex .
Or in Frank speak.
Whores, whores, their all a bunch of whores.
Look what he did to his kickass female Robin in Batman strikes again or Dark knight returns 2.
Better yet , don't. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
First of all, I'm sure it's tough to come up with a black Spartan warrior. And as far as the Spartan queen bending over to the will of a man, she killed him and ended up getting her way.
You may be right, but I don't think so. Better yet, I hope not.
I wish I wasnt right because Frank Millar introduced me to the Dark Knight returns.
Its just the more I saw and read of his work the more I saw his running theme.
As for 300, the queen did kill the guy didnt change the fact she had to take it up the ally because well in Frank Speak the only bargaining chip she had was her sex. Not her mind, not her knife but her sex. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Sirus claims to have read a bunch of Frank Miller stuff and come to a conclusion. As proof, he cites the book '300' written by Frank Miller. Problem being, he's citing a scene that Frank Miller didn't write which was added to the movie. Now, it's one thing to be an idiot. But Sirus is *clearly* lying about having read '300'. The entire subplot that he's talking about was added to the movie by Zack "fratboy" Snyder, because the studio wanted to have a female character, and that was the only way he could conceive of one.
A tip: Knowing even a little bit about what your talking about is generally a good thing.
Frankly, I don't give two sideways shïts if Sirus is lying or not (the guy below claims he isn't), but he most definitely is an idiot. A race-baiting, narcissistic idiot.
As to Gail's profession, I'd say it's reasonable to separate socio-political agendas/implications from the markedly stylized/intentionally-non-realistic take on the genre/mythos conventions Frank is playing with. She's a mean, tough, ruthless, but ultimately good-hearted given the circumstances she's dealt sort of woman, and it's her strength in the face of all that which causes Dwight to love her so much, as he's that same sort of guy and appreciates a kindred spirit.
It's been a while since I read The Dark Knight Strikes Again, but I mainly recall Kerry Kelly being depicted as coming very respectably into her own. Other than her older self being drawn rather alluringly (hard to avoid when drawing an in-shape-for-ass-kicking past-puberty female in a freakin' Catwoman-variant costume), the closest I recall to sexualizing her as a character was when she observes that the Flash has nice legs.
As to Ebony White/Octopus - Let's see, which is more degrading/uplifting to black people? A dated lovable-idiot stereotype lackey to the good guys, or a witty, charismatic villain (often, as here, the most interesting character in the movie), played by a highly respected, intelligent, charismatic actor, clearly having great fun... who happens to be black?
Then again a Good writer wouldnt have put Jackson in a Nazi uniform and write something that half a plot and not a Sin City copy on LSD. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
"There is nothing wrong with beeing a racist..." Uhhhh, I'd say there is plenty wrong with it but I guess that's just my opinion, right? Nah, *beep* that I'm just going to say I'm right on this one.
There aren't any positive white characters in his movies either, you mental midget. But I'm sure that disrupts you and Sirus' whoa-is-me, race-card pulling, victims-mentality agenda you've dreamed up. Yeah, we get it; poooor, poor black people! EVERYONE is against you and you can't catch a break! The evil white Devils in this country are always trying to bring you down because they have nothing better to do! Gimme a *beep* ing break. Smh, you guys are an embarrassment to the black race. Go do something with your life and you won't sit around thinking up new ways to pull a race card outa your stinkhole.
The thing is that it seems like in todays Hollywood they want to cater to everyone and that is why they might have tweaked things a bit from the comic books. That is just my theory on that.
Just like Will Smith altering The Karate Kid and having his son play the lead role. I do not agree with it at all but what can I do about it? I would say not pay to see it.
This may sour an opinion on the woman he was divorced from (Lynn Varley, coincidentally the colorist for most of Miller's more notable works) but likening it to him viewing women negatively as a whole because of it is complete nonsense.
reply share
The human male reaction to divorce vis a via rejection makes no sense. But it varies and it can be extreme.
Guys gets laughed at Miss Popular in high school, ends up showing up with a Gun the next day.
We are men, and we are varied.
If we guys did what only make sense. Woman comedians would have no material for their humor. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
ok Sirus lets take your first example of 300. Please explain to me, how a graphic novel based on Greek history, can be altered to fit you "positive black role"? The Greeks are caucasian, albiet some with better tans than most. And the Persians are of a darker complexion. Are we to just alter what has been history for thousands of years, just to appease the Political Correct lobby??
The Spirit, the character of Ebony White, was a racial insult, he was written as a negative stereotype back in the day. If you had included him the fans of the Spirit would have been up in arms for the fact that he would have been altered so drastically to again appeal to the Political Correct lobby would be the ones bitching instead of you.
Sin City, Ok Michael Clark Duncan is a corrupt cop and gets messed up...and... for the negative of that, you have Gail who is a whore yes, but so is all the other girls in old town, and not everyone in the movie was a whore, you had the doctor in Marv's story plus Goldie's sister. and I think the worst villians in Sin City were Kevin and the Yellow Bastard.... honestly I'm half surpirsed your logic hasn't led you to think that Miller has something against people with jaundes or asians.
These are movies, their are many directors trying to get messages across with their movies, George Romero did it with zombies, but your looking into things WAAAAYY to deeply, look at the source material, and start with that before going on tirades second guessing meaning and methods of people.
Actually 300 is an example of Franks viewpoint regarding women.
Aka Women having only their sex as weapons, or issues with women used for T and A.
My problem with Miller regarding race is that in The Spirit there was an actually positvie black character ( of a sort) but was replaced because it did not fit his world view. Black character vis a via Sin City can be used a dangerous black men aka the Octopus. But not as a positive sort like ally or side kick.
Ebony White, friend and Side kick.
The Octopus from shadowy nemisis , to over the top scary black man.
In a nazi uniform.
The 300 posts where more along the line of his view as women and sidetracked the conversation slightly...
------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Ok, so in 300 Frank Miller degrades women by, in the Spartan Government, that the Queen is allowed to hear and participate in the Kings discussion with Vassals from other kingdoms... which shocks the Vassal. and then she is forced to give herself to a corrupt senator in order for the Senate to hear her pleas to aid the Soldiers, which they have already abbandoned and could care less about. Then turns around and guts the limey bastard like a fish. Where the Persian army, and Xerxes has women as concubines and slaves, which is historically accurate. My god that degrading bastard.
While I already said my peace regarding Ebony White. The Octopus, yeah they could have went with a white guy, but they hired Sam Jackson... and if he saw a major issue with the character, don't you think he would have left the project... actors do that, it's called creative difference... even in Nazi uniforms.
I have no issue with the slaves of the Persians. To put example most of Franks Heroines are of a two sworeded type. They are tough , strong and usually whores or having to sell them self out in a whore like way. The though gals on Sin City , whores or victims. 300 Proud queen can only get ahead by debasing herself .
That is an issue.
As for The Spirit, It was an original, a first showing of a black character. On the story of an average man fighting evil. When Frank decides that Ebony White, one of the few black characters does not fit in the story that is one thing. To add just another black character to act as another scary black man, which is a common theme with him that another thing entirely and too me shows a lot..
------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Ok take a way Sin City for a moment, I mean their are those who were in a hero type role that didn't whore themselves out, but I will agree that they were out numbered. Going back to 300, as sad as it sounds, that was how the world worked pretty much up until 1800's and 1900's Men ruled the world, and the only way a woman could get a head was to either be stronger then the man, which was easier said then done, or whore themselves out, because women have the one thing most men want. While 300 did have a lot of directorial license to the events, that would have been accurate to the time period. now going back to Sin City, the title pretty much tells you that this place ain't sunshine and lollipops. The city is a desolate place full of broken people and dreams, I would wager that a strong willed, wiley non-whore heroine would not really fit well. And besides, the true pervaors of the it's ok to be a whore... Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, they built their fame on sex tapes, if that's not whoring out I don't know what is.
That is a fact.
Going back to the Spirit, it was a first, in the 1930's there was a black hero...who was a joke. Like I said before about Ebony White, could they have updated him, probably, the way the movie played out, it would have been tricky adding him in, I still stand by my earlier statment, I think that since Ebony White was created as a racist stereotype, the omition was not detrimental to the overall story. if they do a sequel I'll say add him, we have the spirit established, give him a sidekick. but for the first run out, I think it was fine without him. As for the Octopus, he was never seen, he as you said was a shadowy figure, and you never see his face and his hands had gloves, how do you know he wasn't originally black. But going back to also the fact that Sam Jackson was good in the role, and you want good actors for any role you have in a movie. While I'll admit, there are certain roles that should stay to their origins, but their are also roles that as long as the actor fits cast.
Did anyone of you actually read the 300 graphic novel. The movie adds a lot of stuff that isn't in it including the whole corrupt senator who the queen has sex with. Frank Miller didn't write the screenplay for 300 so that beef with him is totally unfounded. In the Sin City world everyone is a Bad Guy they are all Killers or Whores... it's not bad guys v.s. good guys it's Bad Guys v.s. Evil guys(with the exception of Wallace). I don't know enough about the Spirit to comment I'm not saying he's not a racist... I'm just not saying he is. I don't know the man and neither do you.
And a lot of fans are starting to notice the disturbing trend.
To leave out a black character because it does not fit your 'vision' even if that character is an intregal part of the mythos. It would be leaving Lois Lane out of Superman or Alfred out of Batman.
And to replace him with a scary over the top evil black man.
Well..there you go.
------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Ok.... Take the Movie "Wanted" based on a comic book... The look of the Character was based on Halle Barry and was a strong black female character the role in the movie went to Angelina Jolie. The leader of the underground group was and old white man and the villain was a burnt to *beep* white man.... in the Movie they merged and made Morgan Freeman a Double Crossing Bastard. is that racist?... and from what I read Ebony White was a sidekick so he was not like Lois Lane( a love interest) or Alfred ( a mentor father figure) he's like Robin..... and all the best Batman movies Omit Robin. Again I am not saying your Wrong I'm saying you might not be right don't rush to such conclusions.. In the Comic the octopus was never seen.. that doesn't work in the movies maybe he used Sam Jackson for his star power.... YOU DON'T KNOW.
A slinky black women head over hills in love with a sociopathic nihlist who shoots up a police station and rapes a movie actress cause he can.
That is a no lose situation.
All I know is from past work , that Miller cant write either a black character who isn't a monster or scary boogie man. Or a woman who isn't about to drop pantie for his stereotypicl ''hero'' .
What I know I know, and if you looked it up you would too. The fact he removed a part of the mythos, a part of what made the spirit. Simply because it doesn't fit his world view.
Women who are whores and lust for his Marty Stu character. He can do, after all he turned complex Selenia Kyle into a prostitue that gets beaten by men on a regular basis.
Scary black monsters, who threaten our hero but our hero beats down.
He did it in Sin City , twice.
A simple legacy character who is friends with the hero, party of the mytholgy for more years then he's been around. Oh , and happens to be black.
Yeah, easier to erase from his vision then think about it... ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
But like Funny said, Ebony White is a kin to Robin, Their have been movies and Stories with Batman and not Robin. Unless Ebony White was with the Spirit since the very, very beginning for the sake of the movie I don't see it as a problem, especially since the movie more or less showed the origin of the Spirit. So again, unless Ebony was with him from the time that mask went on his face, you can do a story without him.
I love the double Standard though, We have no idea who the octopus is, and when it's played by Sam Jackson, Frank Miller is a branded a racisit. Wanted does it, but it's ok, because you think it came out better for the movie.
Actually Ebony white was there in the beggining. He found the Spirit, gave him Shelter and then aided him in his fight.
His Alfred to his Batman.
So it's okay to remove Alfred because..
Not a double standard if you removed a Comic first, a black character in the 1940s and replace him with a scary black man because you as a writer can write that but not a positive one.
As for Wanted, Frank wrote the comic not the script. But the script for the Spirit was Frank . Therefore you arguement becomes somewhat redundant.
The focus is on the short coming and apparent problem Frank has of writing characters outside of a certain mode. Going insofar as removing an important part of the Spirit because it didn't fit his rationale.
But thanks for participating.
------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
I will freely admit, I was not fully aware of Ebony's role in the original Spirit, given that bit of Knowledge, yes I will agree with you they should have included him. I thought he was more of a Robin, not and Alfred...
However the argument over the Octopus is getting silly. Sam Jackson, you know the one who played the character, he was excited about the role, In and interview in Wizard Magazine, he said Miller said he wanted him for the role, and he was stoked about doing it.
This right their despite what you feel about Miller and how he writes characters, should show that if their was intentional malice, would the actor who played him been either so excited or even willing to play him?
I apologize Griever, my coutner arguement was pointlessly snide.
My problem is not Samual J as Octopus.
My problem is that Frank stated that Ebony White was a catricre and had no place in the Spirit world.
Could he have given him an edge, made him an interesting character.
Yup.
Did he.
No.
Frank did what he did best, wrote what he knew. Just threw up another sterotype, another scary racial boogey man.
The question is does Frank Miller have a problem wring positive black characters. And despite there being a black character inbedded into the mythos of the Spirit he couldn't be bother writing about him.
Its kind of him declaring the Spirit to be a tribute to the Noir of the comic. Then after the reviews came in calling it deep fried crap changed his tune to an affectionate parody to save face. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
You say your argument has nothing to do with the Octopus or Sam Jackson... but you keep saying Black Boogie man.... you are impossible have a reasonable argument with because you gloss over people's opinions and keep saying the same thing over and over again..... and if you want a strong, black, women character from a Frank Miller book..... read Ronin and tell me what you think of Casey McKinna..... and if you say black boogie man again.... so help me.
He was there from the start. Part of the mythos of the tale from the beggining. That makes him Alfred.
A poor racial stereotype. Yup.
But this was the 1940s , and it was a first for having a black character of a semi-positive kind.
As for the scary boogie man part, that's what we got. I found the contridiction of getting rid of one black character for being irrevelant but fostering another black character to play the part of another scary black being Millers noir hero can beat to a pulp very unfunny.
You say tomato, I say lemon.
I did not know however Millar wrote it not Miller. My bad.
Doesnt take the stink away of getting rid of a character with over fifty years tied into the main character just because you don't know how to write him. ------------- In a fair universe, we would all be better people.
Some would respond to your argument with the fact that miller wrote for a very strong female black character known as Martha Washington. I recently read it and loved the story. However It seems like the book was written in response to claims that miller's writing was very bigoted.
Misspelling words on purpose does not make you cool.
Miller, like most people of his ilk have a memory hole past the 60s. They romanticize the 40s as if "thats when men were men". He has no understanding of the clandestine forces that have surveilled free people, political activists, and have usurped democractically elected leaders throughout the the years 1953-1974.
He once said; "and we're behaving like a collapsing empire." He seems to misunderstand that WE ARE A COLLAPSING EMPIRE. As a result, he has cookie-cutter villians, usually of color and has a hard time distinguishing infantile machismo and imagined heroism. I did like Sin City, and he doesnt have to be politically correct regarding his characterizations, just a little more realistic and less naive about the world he lives in. The real world, unlike Sin City ... Is not black and white. Its about right and wrong and not military solutions, particularly against a guerilla warfare theater - Vietnam taught us nothing.
I always thought Alan Moore had a much more realistic interpretation about how characters really are - and he didnt feel a need to write black characters, either. Miller and his assertations appear infantile at times.
You don't mention your opinion that all Frank Miller females are portrayed negetively until later.
As for the "problem" of negative black characters, in 300 he was using the historical/legendary story. The Greeks were fighting the Persians. The Persians, and the slaves they had fighting for them, weren't caucasian. In Sin City, sure Manute was a bad guy. But so were Senator Roark, Cardinal Roark, Roark Jr., Kevin, Jackie Boy and Bob, who were all white guys. And Yellow Bastard(Roark Jr. 2.0) was a delightful lemon colour. Then we get to The Spirit, which is a train wreck of a movie. Why change the Octopus from a shadowy, behind-the-scenes manipulator to an indestructible black guy with super strength and atrocious fashion sense? Why eliminate the character of Ebony White instead of updating him to lose the stereotyping(DC did it fairly well in the relaunch of the comic a few years ago . . .)? Why make the Spirit more grim & muttering than a barrel full of Batmans and make him run everywwhere(hard to stop crime when they're driving and you're hoofing it . . .)? It wasn't just black characters Miller was having a problem with there.
Ebony was drawn with darky iconography in mind and his voice was pure Amos N Andy. However, he was a child prodigy (of the streets) who was a noteworthy detective in his own right. Further he saved the Spirit's life innumerable times. While he was too short to attack a hulking thug, he could disarm a gun-toting baddie with a well-tossed piece of handy bric-a-brac. And Ebony had the focus to see minuta evidence the police and his partner failed to notice.
The Spirit considered Ebony his ward; the two shared residence and homelife at Wildwood. His mentor and the Dolans paid for Ebony's formal education and routinely the strip featured the Spirit reading letters from the school indicating how well the youth was processing.
The drawing was a product of the era, as any Tex Avery or Bob Clampett toon fan can tell you. However Will Eisner made Ebony White an active, heart-felt member of the cast...a more realistic sidekick than Robin, Bucky, or Pinoko!
I think you need to actually read Sin city, or at least watch the movie. The Whores rely on sex because its an integral part of the job. They have power because they use guns, the same way that all the men in that setting get power so they are about the most equal oportunity females in fiction. Their ability to control thier own destiny and not be controlled bt pimps or gansters isn't because they have a snatch, its because they have guns and skills.
Sirius,(contempory) Noir works mostly on strong stereotypical characters and you can pick any example and criticise its over simplification and broad brushstrokes but stop reading your own agenda into stuff, it's not healthy.
in 300 the bad guys are persian (for the most part), but the color of their skin has nothing to do with anything. it's greeks vs. persians. sin city had more than one bad guy, remember the yellow dude? performed by a WHITE guy.
Part of the issue is Miller's inspirations. He has stated that he was and is a huge fan of crime fiction, particularly hardboiled stuff like Spillane, James M. Cain (Postman Always Rings Twice, Double Indemnity) and Jim Thompson. He is a fan of film noir. He gained great success adapting the templates of those works into comics, particularly Daredevil and Batman, both of which centered around urban environments and had past histories with darker villains (more Batman than Daredevil, prior to Miller). Those films and novels are filled with femme fatales a double crosses, with few redeeming characters. Sin City was the culmination of that love. Eisner is one of his artistic heroes, but aside from borrowing some of Eisner's technical innovations (cinematic layouts, splash pages, noir lighting) he seems mostly drawn to the femme fatales. Ebony White was a racial charicature and disappeared from the comic, mostly, after a while. He could have been updated, but I think Miller cared more about getting the femme fatales on the screen. His version of the Octopus could have been anyone, with the same over-the-top costuming. I wouldn't assign racist attitudes based on that, but would say he isn't particularly sensitive to those issues.
Having read much of his work, ethnic minorities aren't well represented, beyond background characters, but the first rule of writing is write what you know. Perhaps he doesn't feel he can write authentic minority characters and does so sparingly. With that said, his Martha Washington does fly in the face of much of the arguments listed so far. She is a heroic character and portrayed in a positive light, while coming from a fairly authentic background. there are inconsistencies, but it is a satire and reality is bent quite a bit.
I don't know the guy, so who knows about his real beliefs and personality. I do know that much of his work after Dark Knight has a rather nasty streak, even in its humor. perhaps that was the real Frank coming through, perhaps it is his literary influences and he isn't comforatble outside of those realms.
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read."-Groucho
I think African-Americans can survive the negative portrayals of Blacks in decidedly mediocre movies. Frank Miller has far worse problems than using Blacks as antagonists in his films, his dull pacing and self absorbed rambling of his characters are far more offensive .
BTW, the ancient Persians were Black and I'm glad that was shown in a major Hollywood movie that enlightened millions of viewers of that fact.
Live Full & Die Empty. Tap Your Potential and Realise Your Dreams!
by - patkav6 on Sat Jul 9 2011 06:28:14 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prisons are filled with 60% from the black community containing convicted felons. Maybe he's going by the numbers.
My response:
Back it up with a legit link. Persoanlly, I don't think Frank Miller has issues with people of color. But, I think YOU do!
Live Full & Die Empty. Tap Your Potential and Realise Your Dreams!
BTW, the ancient Persians were Black and I'm glad that was shown in a major Hollywood movie that enlightened millions of viewers of that fact.
Just like the Egyptians, ancient Israelites(Google black Hebrew Israelite), and Jesus? Sorry no the ancient Persians are the modern day Iranians, just like the ancient Egyptians are the modern Egyptians plus some Islamic influence.
reply share
Miller didn't eliminate the character of Ebony because he was "positive" but quite the opposite. Ebony was a horrible racist stereotype in the original comic, complete with bulging eyes, thick fat lips and bad English. It would be impossible to render such a character in front of modern audiences, so Miller decided to scrap it off.
I still think this movie was pretty awful, but I don't think Frank Miller is a racist. He has done comics with positive black characters. Check out Frank Miller's series "Give Me Liberty" starring Martha Washington, a black female heroine who saves the world.
Does FM have a problem? Are you kidding? The guy has lost his mind in recent years. His work up to the early 90's is great, but he is a major right-wing racist scumbag today. Just google 'frank miller racist' and see what comes up.