Ms.JIllette
Einar was, which is truly frustrating about the film's tale, perfectly fine being a husband and painter as a man. The opportunity, as it appears in the film, seemed to release in him his desire to be female which is who Henrik was attracted to regardless of his physical limitations (as a female). Question. Was it only visual?
Like I said earlier, until we could we couldn't and people on this continuum lived healthier lives without synthetics and foreign objects inserted or bits and parts removed. Some functions, such as urination, are intact 'as is' when we're born, and there's no real way to change the insides of us, not even our minds.
Today's science has advanced to a place where we're practically bionic, and (for me) that science and technology is best reserved for that, not interfering with the sent set-out blueprint determined by birth. For me, I don't feel it is absolutely necessary to do any of it, if you're with the right person. Bodies do not need to define us, our souls do. If Einar had the soul of a woman then fine, be that. Just leave your body alone. He, in case you didn't notice, died a young man, feeling he'd been turned into a woman. Was he really turned into a woman? Methinks not. That is what is in his soul, Einar was, which is truly frustrating about the film's tale, perfectly fine being a husband and painter as a man. The opportunity, as it appears in the film, seemed to release in him his desire to be female which is who Henrik was attracted to regardless of his physical limitations (as a female). Question. Was it only visual?
Like I said earlier, until we could we couldn't and people on this continuum lived healthier lives without synthetics and foreign objects inserted or bits and parts removed. Some functions, such as urination, are intact 'as is' when we're born, and there's no real way to change the insides of us, not even our minds.
Today's science has advanced to a place where we're practically bionic, and (for me) that science and technology is best reserved for that, not interfering with the sent set-out blueprint determined by birth. For me, I don't feel it is absolutely necessary to do any of it, if you're with the right person. Bodies do not need to define us, our souls do. If Einar had the soul of a woman then fine, be that. Just leave your body alone. He, in case you didn't notice, died a young man, feeling he'd been turned into a woman. Was he really turned into a woman? Methinks not. That is what is in his soul, mind, actions, not the body.
So, transgender people should just live in a body that they can't function in because they should just be happy with their souls?
Says who? And why would it matter to you?
Lili Elbe was 48 when she died from complications of experimental surgeries.
The movie is based on the novel The Danish Girl which fictionalizes the real story.
Because of that I think it's simplistic in how it portrays that story.
How do you know people who were transgender lived healthier lives because gender reassignment surgery wasn't available or perfected?
How many lived secretive miserable lives because they couldn't become who they were meant to be?
The "set out blueprint" you describe can be wrong for some people. But as long as no one is demanding you change your "blueprint" I don't see why it matters to you.
Perhaps you should look at it this way. If you go to bed tonight and wake up tomorrow in a man's body would you be okay with that? Would you be okay suddenly being trapped in the wrong body for you?
Maybe you would. But many people wouldn't. They'd feel like they were trapped.
Lili didn't die believing she'd been turned into a woman. She was a woman trapped in the physical body of a male.
Unfortunately for her medicine hadn't advanced enough to help her.
The Wizard Has Spoken
reply
share