I think the movie could have been more popular without the PENIS scene and references.
shareyeah i agree, the penis was unrequired and it gave it a rating that's adult only. I think this could've made more money and appealed to more people without the penis.
shareNecessary? No.
Visually satisfying? Yes!
I wasn't expecting Segal to have such an impressive....appendage
Then again, being that he is 6'4, I guess I shouldn't be so surprised lol.
If we wanna hear you talk, I will shove my arm up your ass and work your mouth like a puppet
The PENIS scene was neccessary. Come on, Peter has a dick for the ages...a good lookin' dick. You want a Lolly?
Jeff K
Full time dreamer.
"Excuses are like buttholes - everybody has one and they all stink."
Blegh, I could've done without it. And i'm sorry but I don't think it's hypocritical either. Women are just nice to look at naked whereas men are not. To quote Elaine from Seinfeld, "The female body is a work of art, the male body is just for getting around, it's like a Jeep".
-------------------------------------
Former username Kawada_Shogo
Shame on ya'll. It was absolutely necessary for my entertainment.
sharenope, you're just culturally conditioned to think that female nudity is aesthetically pleasing while male nudity, not so much. it's called the male gaze, do a google search. beauty is a social construct.
i liked the scene, it was just so normal (people spend a lot more time naked than run-of-the-mill hollywood movies would have us believe) but of course, completely awkward in the context of what was happening. well played.
Isn't it amazing how insecure and close minded some guys get when faced with what women have had to deal with and grown accustomed to for about half a century?
Another naked guy they must see..Oh my..
Get those panties out of a wad and deal with it.
Open minded doesn't work one way.
Oh, and don't use the excuse that men don't have nice bodies like women.
Ridiculous.. Some men have very nice bodies to look at.
I really love this comment.
share[deleted]
100%.... I gave a rating of 1 because of that. Implied works just as well.
I really wish IMDB would be more clear on what movies show naked males so I do not watch them.(dont have to worry about naked female because there are none)
I still can not believe that non porn movies still need penis and/or testicles in it. I find it odd that to have a full naked male showing his penis out there for all to see is okay but to show an "actual naked female(shaved vagina, other wise it looks like an arm pit)" it becomes porn. Equal rights show it all or not at all. forget hollywood. I would rather implied nudity then to see it.
39 pages.. I doff my hat to you, sir, your trollery is pleasingly done.
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived. -Isaac Asimov