MovieChat Forums > Numb (2008) Discussion > Most pathetic main character EVER

Most pathetic main character EVER


Seriously, did anybody go through a short phase in their teenage years that resembled this guy's entire pathetic existence?

I'm hoping somebody agrees with me. I've never seen a character seek attention and pity like this guy. You can tell the screenwriter must've based the story on himself a bit.

Who wants to watch a movie about a pastey writer with little life experience.

reply

You obviously have never suffered from a personality disorder. I think Matthew Perry did outstandingly well in portraying a character haunted by this terrible affliction. I suffer from Acute General Anxiety Disorder myself so I can relate to this character for the most part.
That's not attention and pity he's seeking, he's seeking inner peace.

reply

Oi 'Just Jutt' you really can't relate with the character if you have never been through something like that mate.
I saw this movie when i,myself was suffering from depression. And my goodness this movie was like a bloody gift, like a blessing of some kind that i ggot to see this then. It made me much more at ease with my condition.
The Darjeeling Limited is another movie that had a similar impact on me.

reply

Crazy13791, I completely agree with you. I too was suffering from depression/anxiety at the time. My girlfriend and I watched this movie together and it brought even closer together after watching it. For anyone out there is suffering from any personality disorder, this film is a must-see. It's so enlightening to see this brought to the mainstream. This film is completely underrated, it's a true gem.

reply

i too agree, i was suffering from erectile disfunction and it was a deeply moving movie for me

reply

I agree that the first writer has never suffered from depersonalization disorder, but its not a personality disorder, it's a dissociative disorder. BIG DIFFERENCE. Generalized Anxiety Disorder, btw, is also not a personality disorer (in case you thought it was)-its an anxiety disorder. If you aren't sure, its helpful to check out the latest edition of the DSM. But please don't run around calling dissociative disorders personality disorders or anxiety disorders mood disorders or.. you get the point... personality disorders are entirely different.

DPD can be triggered by drugs, but if it is, its called HPPD.AS for people who think it's poathetic to have derealization, for any reason, I'd like to give it to them. 24-7 of being unnable to tell which direction is up or if you're awake or still dreaming- its like being on a bad aci trip thatnever goes away... see how they like it. As for panic attacks that are terrifying enough to seek medical assistance... those are humiliating and demoralizing for the sufferer. Nobody likes to look weak and pathetic around other people, especially doctors. The fact that people still go whyen they are freaking out means that whatever they are freaking out is scarier to them than looking weak, pathetic or whatever other insult you want to give 'em.

I haven't seen this movie yet, though, so Hudson may or may not be annoying. I don't know. I looked at the quotes, and his attitude that someone else can "save" him is annoying me already, but again, this is just one movie and even the main character is annoying, he doesn't speak for everyone else who is going through panic disorders or dissociative disorders.



"Man is a social animal who despises his fellow man" ~ Delacroix

reply

I have to agree with him, I spend days where I suffer from diagnosed temporary depersonalization and Matthew's portrayal is 100% right.

"Tell me great hero but please make it brief, is there a hole for me to get sick in?"

reply

I dealt with anxiety issues for years and years, and to an extent I still do, and I still find the main character mostly pathetic.

reply

[deleted]

SOUNDS LIKE JUSTJUTT WASN'T LOVED BY DADDY. you clearly have no sympathy when others suffer, it must have been the same for you. Did he beat you?

reply

Wow, what a d i c k. I was attacking the movie, not you, man. People like you are what's wrong with the world today.

And I don't sympathize with characters who individualize themselves through suffering. He was totally seeking attention, not help. Like, get over it already.

reply

Though I am not sure if I really suffer from a personality disorder, a year ago i started developing symptoms a little like in this movie, especially the feeling of dissasociation, and it was nothing like this. At the time it was worst i felt like i was going insane, and according to friends i looked it. This guy just looked bored. But anyway, its a crap, lame rom-com, so what do you expect.

reply

"Wow, what a d i c k. I was attacking the movie, not you, man. People like you are what's wrong with the world today.

And I don't sympathize with characters who individualize themselves through suffering. He was totally seeking attention, not help. Like, get over it already."


As someone said, you clearly cannot sympathize with people. "Get over it?" Have you ever had any type of ongoing problem? Do you realize depersonalization is a real problem that can be a life-going struggle for people? I guess you've never had a major mental or physical problem that you can relate to. You were probably the kid in school who terrorized weaker kids and got humor out of it.

People like YOU are what's wrong with the world today; you can't understand the pain and suffering of others. God help me for saying this, but I hope someday you have a major problem in which you suffer so you can understand what's it like.


"What happened to the American dream?"
"It came true! You're looking at it!"

reply

Dear Just_Jutt,
You... are a moron.

reply

I don't think you really understand mental disorders so you can't feel sympathy.

Anyone can have a certain thought pattern which leads to something they might relate to depersonalization, or something with similar symptoms. Someone might get depression from pitying themselves or just a certain thought pattern they got into. Teenagers are more likely to get this because of changes to their body/horomones/etc, temporarily.

But chronic mental disorders are not going to be solved, even by cognitive/behavioral therapy when they are neurological in nature, or caused by your body producing the incorrect chemicals to feel normal. Many people with depression or depersonalization try to hide it from the people around them, but that doesn't last forever.

As well, many familys pass on genes that predispose their kids or grandkids to similar conditions. How could this be if it was just someone being sorry for themselves?

It is like telling a schizophrenic person to stop seeing things. Or even like telling somebody with Parkinson's disease to stop shaking. They can't just shut it off.

And if it was just the portrayal in the movie that bothered you, I really didn't see the character trying to get attention. I saw a character that was trying to learn how to deal with depersonalization, which was new to his life.

reply

Everyone seems to have a good idea as to why I was so bothered by this character. Apparently I have no sympathy for others, bullied the weak in school, wasn't loved by daddy, have no understanding of people with disorders, and deserve to suffer some sort of major problem so that I may finally learn to empathize with this fictional person's pain.

Christ. Maybe I just didn't buy that he was suffering from a disorder at all. I mean, seriously, the man's in his late thirties/early forties with no previous history of any mental anguish other than being neurotic, has caring parents and doesn't appear to have had a rough past. There's no genetic factor, everyone in his family shown or spoken of are psychologically healthy; he's got nothing major to complain about, whether it concerns nature or nurture.

So, we're supposed to believe that Chandler smokes a bit too much reefer one night, has a bad trip, and loses his ability to recognize what's real and isn't? There is no supporting evidence that weed can have any long-term psychological effects, but those of you that have experimented with it before (and believe me, it's a higher percentage than you think) know that it can be a reality kick and may even alter your perception of the world around you.

The doctor he was seeing didn't even seem concerned or have the slightest interest in him, yet the main character was able to justify and talk to everybody about his supposed "mental problem" because this guy with a diploma on the wall gave him the name of a disorder with vague symptoms and a pill prescription.

If this character was on trial for murder and used his doctor's testimony to try and prove he wasn't responsible for his actions or couldn't have known what he was doing or something along those lines, it'd be like the infamous Twinkie-Defense all over again, only he wouldn't get away with it in the end.

I mean, it's not like the sale of prescription drugs isn't a newly skyrocketed industry, it's not as if the doctor didn't have anything to gain from the character's weekly pill refills and therapy sessions. And Chandler had even heard and knew you shouldn't stay with a doctor who can't help you within a certain timeframe.

Sheeesh. Throughout the entire movie, we see the character have some sort of so-called "attack" twice; once from puffin' on a dubbie with his friends and having an overreacted freak-out, and once from spending the night at his parents' place, where he literally tries to crawl into bed with them "panicking" and breathing weird (and you people say his true agenda isn't seeking attention ... pfffft, why does he only have attacks when he's surrounded), and the rest of the film he just bitches over how he can't tell what's real and not, despite having no difficulty functioning in his environment.

I can tell the screenwriter for this movie must've based Chandler's character on his own pathetic life and experiences, the main character is a screenwriter and the movie is narrated in first-person after all.

People with real issues have a harder time talking about them. This guy wouldn't shut up about his. And that was my major beef with him, he was like a sixteen-year-old emo seeking attention.

Most pathetic main character EVER! EVER!!!

reply

"People with real issues have a harder time talking about them. This guy wouldn't shut up about his. And that was my major beef with him, he was like a sixteen-year-old emo seeking attention. "

I'm gonna have to agree with you on this one, but un-like everyone else who was attacking you on this board, i actually have depersonlization disorder, When i was first diagnosed I tried telling some people but no one understands, to do this day they still don't. And from what i saw, the character was not pathetic at all. Matthew Perry did an amazing job portraying someone with a disorder that is so hard to explain that acting it must be nearly impossible. Through medication and therapy i've controlled my disorder but I don't agree with anything else you've posted. For example you can be fully functioning with this disorder, it's just you see the world in a very different way, and those "attacks" he were having were called panic attacks, if you've never had one I don't expect you to understand what they are like.

To be honest, your posts had some validity to them, but you mainly sound like an insensitive prick who likes to stir up problems on internet discussion boards. You even called him "chandler." Grow the *beep* up and get a life, thanks.

reply

You related with the main character . . . as if that's not every writer's goal. And yes, I did notice all of the well applied writing techniques that I'm sure earned a majority of its viewers sympathy for Chandler. But, all in all, for me this movie was nothing other than the story of a sniveling attention-seeking screenwriter told through his point-of-view. Writers always portray themselves as the person they'd want to be.

Like I said before, it seems the writer of this movie based the character on his own pathetic life experiences; and I'm sure that if we were there as the events that inspired this motion-picture actually occurred, we wouldn't have bought it.

The only validity he had of actually having any disorder was a doctor who clearly gained an enormous profit from this character, and "attacks" he always conveniently had when either with friends or family. And the reason I put "attacks" in quotations is because I don't really believe he's having any sort of real attack (maybe a freak-out, but nothing medical). I know what panic attacks are, duh.

Yeah, I called him Chandler and will continue to do so, it's just easier. You could argue that I'm an insensitive prick and that I have no life, I'm sure you've been able to acquire a perfect understanding of my entire personality and social history from the few message board posts I've made, but you can't tell me I'm wrong. Thanks. Douche.

reply

If you knew anything about the movie you'd know that Harris Goldberg, the writer and director, smoked pot to ease his tension one day, setting off the dormant condition known as depersonalization. I don't just relate to the main character, i know what he was going through. This really is a play by play of what Harris Goldberg went through, and yes i can tell you you're wrong because you really have no idea what the hell you're talking about, your the kind of person who goes against the grain just to go against the grain, to stir up anger on a posting board. Well sir, well done, you've accomplished what you wanted, now you can go back to your Erotic Aspyhxiation routine. Thanks. "Douche"

reply

Erotic Asphyxiation? Hahaha, I just looked that up! Quite a unique insult, or maybe a Freudian slip? Did I just figure out one of your turn-ons? Never mind.

Yeah, I guess I'm stirring up some people considering I have such an opposing opinion, but that doesn't mean I'm not gonna continue arguing for it.

And yes, I had a feeling Harris Goldberg went through similar circumstances as portrayed by Chandler. Symptoms of depersonalization don't just lie dormant for forty years and then conveniently pop up during what looks like a mid-life crisis, that just isn't right.

Looking up some additional information, I found a guy who seems to be in a similar mindset as the character in this movie on a site called MedHelp. Apparently his psychiatrist agrees with his SELF-diagnosis (that's right, he diagnosed himself) of depersonalization and started him on a pill prescription. He's wondering what to do now because he can no longer afford to keep seeing his doctor.

Does nobody buy the fact that in a world where 17% more people are on some kind of prescription drug when compared to 10 years ago and 40% are taking more than what they used to, that there are doctors who take advantage of the simply neurotic on a daily basis to up their own income? Especially these financially successful Hollywood types like our hero.

And he was even told in the movie not to stay with a doctor who can't help you after a few weeks. Despite the doctor clearly having no concern over the character's mental health, he stayed. Sounds like Chandler doesn't want to be told there's nothing really wrong with him. Other than the doctor and Chandler's constant bitching, there was nothing to indicate that what he experienced was anything other than a minor symptom in experimenting with recreational drugs.

I'm sure it went away and he just convinced himself it didn't. Or maybe after he got the name of such an obscure disorder, subconsciously decided to hold onto the symptoms because he secretly loved the attention (he did try smoking a lot of pot at one point to supposedly REVERSE the effects?), one's subconscious is a truly powerful thing.

Anyways, I'm done trying to explain why I feel this character was making a big deal over nothing special. I could argue that maybe you're going through a similar case of denial and confusion, but I'm not going to make any assumptions of you because I'm not that kind of person (ignore the first paragraph).

And how do you know I don't know what I'm talking about? Maybe I can relate to Chandler more than you, maybe I went through a similar phase in my teenage years but was man enough to admit later that it was all BS. Maybe Harris Goldberg has more in common with me than you in that there's nothing really wrong with him.

I'm sure a lot of people related with what Edward Norton in Fight Club was going through too, but that doesn't mean they're all insomniacs and schizophrenics.

Come on, deep down, you know I'm right.

reply

Haha no i didn't look it up, i was watching a movie where a kid accidentally dies from it and the whole plots based on that. Anyways, i do agree with you to an extent, but like i've told you, i have this disorder and wasn't self diagnosed. I had bouts of it when i was a child but it was never chronic until i had smoked pot. I'm not against anyone who smokes, it's their business, it just obviously screwed me up more than you'd wanna know, i had MRI's, Cat Scans, every test in the book because it makes you feel like your going nuts, i thought i had a brain tumor or something, but no, a psychatrist had to be the one to diagnose it. I've even been in touch with Daphne Simeon (look her up, please) and you will realize this is a real disease. Not just *beep* come on, deep down you know we're both right. Like i can give you my story word for word, and you'd say you just gave me a synopsis of the movie numb, but my case happened years before numb was even written.

reply

Also, i think we are fighting about two completely different things, the main character is pathetic, because the disease has turned his life into just that, a pathetic life, but you have to know what it's like to have the disease in order to know why he's pathetic. Yes, all of us went through pathetic teenage years, but trust me, it's nothing like this, i'm more into you understand this is a disease then to argue that the character is pathetic. You know what i mean?

reply

Alright, I get your point. I understand that depersonalization is a textbook psychological disorder, and I don't doubt the fact that you suffer from it.

My argument is that you've simply been duped. I mean, did you see Chandler's eyes light up when the doctor told him he had this disorder? That was him suddenly realizing he had become an individualized, unique, and interesting character . . . or so he thought. Really, he was just the same dull and self-loathing loser he was before, only with an excuse to express his angst without seeming like he's just bitching and crying out for attention (which he is).

As he said in the movie, when Chandler first finds out about the disorder, he later found himself constantly talking about it with friends and random people. He obviously became an expert on the subject and I'm sure he accurately portrayed the disorder to some degree in the script he would inevitably write about himself that would become the movie we're discussing now.

You even said yourself that you had dealt with bouts of depersonalization in your youth. This isn't a disorder that just randomly pops up in your forties. It even states in the movie that he'd never experienced anything like it.

Had he waited more than a few days before seeing his doctor, I'm sure the effect would've gone away. According to a study referenced by drugabuse.gov, marijuana does have a psychological impact and can create mental deficiencies, but never permanently. In fact, all psychological effects caused by reefer are short-term and go completely away after four weeks max.

I have no doubt that Chandler might very well have convinced himself he really has this disorder. If that's the case, my argument is that he's completely delusional. Ultimately, it just doesn't add up and I find myself reaching the conclusion that he's simply faking it due to his deep-seeded need to be different and noticed whether he realizes it or not.

And for that reason, and that reason alone, he is the most pathetic main character in movie history. Am I the only one who sees through the cracks?

reply

Ok, you have made your point that he is a pathetic main character, but i strongly disagree with the fact that only because he thinks he has it, is the reason that he suffers from it. But then again i'm biased, i have it and trust me, i've tried every thing in the book to not have it, i take something called klonopin, and when i take it, I see the world as i saw it before the disorder came along, if i'm off of it for more than 24 hours, it comes right back. It is however only caused by anxiety, because alcohol has the same effect that the klonopin has, (with a few more side effects of course). I get your point that he is pathetic, but really the only way to understand why he is so pathetic is to have the problem. And i did say i had bouts of it, it's something according to leading psychiatrists, you're born with, not something pot causes, i can't tell you how many times i blamed the pot. I don't think he's looking for attention, i really think he's just looking for an answer about how to get his life back. You know?

reply

Yeah . . . I don't agree. I'm sure actually having depersonalization would give me a better understanding of the disorder, but I don't see myself sympathizing with this character any more than I do now.

The character has an enormous house, makes a very healthy living as a screenwriter (a dream job for most), has a loving family and friends, is fully capable, and on top of everything else now has a super hot and caring girlfriend.

He's such a depressing character in spite of all this and when his perception of reality is supposedly (I still think he's faking) distorted, he uses it as an excuse to finally be able to complain about something, never mind how good he has it.

So many people who have it far worse and have far less are so much more optimistic than this douche.

And yes, it is believed that most people are born with this disorder and he obviously hadn't experienced anything like it before, it's not just something that shows up out of nowhere. Thank you for proving my point that he probably doesn't actually have depersonalization at all.

I don't think he's looking for answers, he probably has everything figured out and is just playing the world around him.

reply

DP can develop at any point in life, however, I'm not here to attack you, i was before, but you've made some very valid point's. I'm just sensitive to the topic due to the fact that it has been a major bitch in my life.

reply

Fair enough, but that's not what you said before about DP. I don't know, you're the expert. I still think he might be delusional.

reply

I'm only the expert on me, he could very well be delusional, everyone's different i spose. It is a dissociative disorder after all

reply

Delusional to the fact that his true agenda is bitching for attention despite having nothing to bitch about ...

... making him a truly pathetic character.

Like a thick-headed jock with the common delusion that he's God's gift to women, Chandler has the delusion that he's suffering from a disorder that deserves to be taken seriously, like DP.

You know damn-well what I mean when I say he might be delusional. And that's if he's not just plain deceiving.

reply

No i really thought you meant something else by delusional, chill.

reply

Yeah, like I'd think he's suffering in some way whatsoever from any psychological problem. What am I, an idiot?

reply

Well now i know why your so against the main character. I just read a post from another board, your a pothead, who is obviously mad the movie is blaming it on pot. GET OVER IT, I have nothing against potheads you should have nothing against anyone who doesn't like it. So yes, i do think you're an idiot.

reply

Yeah, I remember that post. I also remember you responding to it way before we began this little debate. Why pretend like you just discovered it?

No more points to make? Frustrated that a stoner has more valid arguments, so you try to discredit his character? Man, you suck.

And I have nothing against anyone who doesn't like or use pot, I don't know where you got that from? You're saying I'm mad at the movie for blaming it on the pot? You're just as biased! I could easily say you love the movie just because it's about depersonalization, something nobody's ever bothered portraying in film before.

You're the one who needs to get over it, my friend. You're the idiot. And a douche.

reply

First of all, your post i'm talking about was in a different board, so you're retarded. And that was my point to make. Also, the stoner's arguments are valid to you and only you. Maybe your right, i do need to get over it, but i'm certainly not the one who started this thread, you did, looking to piss people off. And get a new comeback, "douche" is getting quite old. I don't even know why i respond to these anymore, you're probably a highschool kid anyways. Absolute stupidity on my part. I'm done, have a nice useless life with your pot, tool.

reply

Just because you were referring to a different post, doesn't mean you didn't reply to and know about the other post long ago, knowing I smoked from the beginning. It's retarded that you're trying to claim this as new information to you.

And the reason you keep responding is because I make a valid point with each post and accurately note something stupid from one of yours.

You just don't want it to look like you've lost the debate, which you obviously have. I don't go around trying to piss people off, some people, like yourself, just let themselves get pissed off over movie board posts nobody really cares about. And "douche" never gets old, bitch.

reply

Listen prick, you don't know what I do or do not know, your not me, and you know zero about me except for the fact that i have DP. I didn't read enough of your posts to know you smoked, and you haven't made any valid points at all.
For example saying there is no medical research backing this up, maybe if you got off this board and read a frigen book once in a while you'd know there's plenty of research, but you're too busy doing this in between your porno site visits. Do you have a job? Do you do anything with your life? Cause you seem to respond to these things very quickly, and we all know you can't pass a drug test, a staple at most companies now a days.

So here is what i know, you like to act like a tough guy behind that computer of yours. Stop assuming and acting like you know everything about everything, it's probably the most annoying quality in the world. If I knew you got your jolly's from sitting at your computer waiting to pick fights, I would have never even posted after you, I've got better things to do. I wish this wasn't online, I guarantee this conversation would be much different in person. Also, Our debate went way beyond Hudson being a pathetic main character, and even if it hadn't, you didn't make strong enough points to "win" all you kept saying was he's delusional he's delusional and even if you could make strong enough points i could give a rats ass, THIS IS A BOARD FOR A MOVIE, i mean honestly i can't believe I'm taking all this time but your stupidity intrigues me so much. Maybe also read some of the other posts from people in this very thread, they all think your a dick too. but i'm sure you're one of those kids whose gonna come back and say "I dont care if people think i'm a dick, I'm a person who enjoys bothering people. This is the last post i'm going to make, so you go ahead and do your little rebuttle, which we both know you will 'cause you need the last word. I feel utterly sorry for you or anyone who has to deal with you on a regular pace.

Have an amazing life, bitch.

reply

Dude, you gotta stop moving my words around. I said there were no studies connecting any long-term psychological disorders with marijuana use, here's one that confirms that:

http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/58/10/909

Other than that, all I've really been saying before is that this is a character faking a disorder to get attention, perpetuated by a money-hungry quack. And I still think I've made some good arguments for this.

Oh, and I work in an internet cafe, genius. So, yeah, I'm online a lot. I guess I do like arguing with retards like you in cyberspace to a certain degree. Does that make me so horrible?

What's your excuse? You make just as many posts, just as frequently! You're the one trying to act tough on a message board, you loser. Yeah, "this conversation would be much different in person," too bad it isn't.

And you're right, I don't care what people think of me ONLINE, most people don't. Most people, not as bored as I am, just leave their two-cents and see how others respond. But, not you, you're hilarious. And just too much damn fun.

I do have a life outside these boards and am grateful for all that I have, unlike Chandler however, despite his success. How pathetic of him. Also, glad to hear you're finally giving up and getting back to whatever else I'm sure you had going on before. About time, douche.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

You're right that the character is not perfect. Neither is the movie. Neither is the actor. Neither is the plot. Neither is the script.

You're right that pot does not necessarily have anything to do with this. Some people claim that to be the case. Perhaps it's just a useful tool to realize that the underlying condition is also present.(I thought that that was a prevailing message in the movie) Perhaps not. It seems maybe that it was a mistake to emphasize that part of the movie by placing it at the very beginning, which reinforces negative stereotypes about cannabis. However, I can see how it is a useful tool in bringing the audience into the movie and how that may have played out like that for the writer as well.

Personally I don't get why you think he just wants attention. That's a common response to most 'mental' illnesses. You stated you've/you're experienced/ing some yourself and have probably encountered this attitude before. Therefore, I assume you're using it to get attention yourself, by provoking some kind of reaction in others. Again, I don't get why. Is it projection? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection) If not, that's certainly what you've received in responses so far anyway, whether negative or positive, although obviously mostly negative. Maybe it does not matter which.

Either way, I disagree. What I saw was through the small flashbacks to traumatizing childhood events, that were way too subtle, the story alluded to the cause of the the state that the character suffered from. Whether you accept those events as sufficient in comparison to wars or other horrific events like sexual abuse or whatever else, is largely irrelevant. If it causes trauma to the child's existence, it is sufficient.

Also, you stated that his family was normal/supportive. To me it clearly was not: His brother completely ignored him. His father talked largely in one line sayings. His mother kicked him out of the house at a very young age for some unknown reason. She also stated later on that she felt like she was very similar to him. All signs of emotional detachment to me. Neglect is emotional abuse. The irony being that this is what he inflicted upon Sara by being so emotionally unavailable(unintentionally). It's too bad they didn't go more into this, and its cyclical nature.

The result of trauma is usually some form of dissociation in order to cope with the trauma, which can be completely subconscious. Hence the main condition in this movie: Depersonalization Disorder. The childhood events could be suppressed or deemed inconsequential by the sufferer or their peers, especially if misunderstood or deemed to be nothing by society at large. This can go on totally unrecognized for many years - assumed to be normal by the sufferer until some event or cumulation thereof shows them otherwise. In this case, pot. Dissociation caused by trauma can render someone completely dis-functional and completely unable to take care of themselves as well, if severe and/or suffered long enough.

If one does not get why they're like this and know for sure it is not normal and feel more disconnected and feel like they're going crazy, it would be totally normal to try to reach out. The movie is about this protagonist anyway so why get annoyed?(maybe it triggered something in you) Also, wasn't he kind of avoiding the outside world through watching golf and preferring to go out onto the streets when nobody was around? How is that attention seeking?

Personally I don't like the pharmaceutical side of things or current trends either. However, sometimes it is necessary when all else fails and you need to cope to survive. I don't like how much therapy costs and how some professionals act. However, both issues are dealt with in the movie, so I don't know why you are bringing this up.

However, one must recognize that putting such a complex and subtle concept into a 90 min commercial movie is tough. Especially if you want it to remain somewhat entertaining. Therefore, as usual shortcuts are made. But considering, I still think they did a good job, even with all the unnecessary components that gave it an R rating as well other inaccuracies or irrelevant storyline. Also the ending seemed a bit incomplete. (That might cause some to not get the point of the movie)

If people find meaning in this movie, even if it has a somewhat unreal quality at times(irony alert), and want to praise it for even bringing this out in the open and possibly even relieving their symptoms a bit: Tough $&^%.

If this was just an exercise in managing ocd related to the movie not being perfect(like me): Also Tough $%^&.

Sorry for the wall of text.

Short Layman version:
childhood emotional neglect > anxiety > dissociation > derealization > disfunctionality > distress > reaching out for help and/or separating yourself from the world(irony of irony)

reply

Don't worry about the wall of text, I'm just as guilty.

I don't know, I'm still not convinced he really had depersonalization. I'm aware of what causes trauma to the brain and that some mentality's are more fragile than others, but the entire movie felt like he was just trying to convince the viewer he was going through something legit and I just didn't buy it.

And you're right, he was aware of the fact that there are doctors who take advantage of their patients. However, despite his knowledge and suspicion of this, he did nothing about it. That doesn't bother anybody at all? That he would accept the first doctor's diagnosis without question?

From that point on, I'm sure he learned everything there was to know about depersonalization and would not allow himself to pass a test proving otherwise. Total denial of normalcy perpetuated by a quack.

I asked people in my first post if anyone had gone through a similar phase in their teenage years because, honestly, this character reminds me of Napoleon Dynamite: Making up stories so people won't see him for what he really is and completely and utterly overdramatic concerning every little thing.

And does depersonalization disorder really lay dormant in somebody without any previous mental history for forty years? When he was smoking a joint in the beginning of the movie, that wasn't his first joint ever, was it? He'd done it before, why didn't the disorder pop up then, was it that in that particular instance he was surrounded by friends and thought it would be a good time to stand out? Or, did they mention if it was his first one? Because that would more accurately explain his little freak-out.

I don't know, man. To me, he's just another guy wishing he was a unique snowflake and not part of the same compost pile as the rest of us. That's from a movie, but it works here too. We all have those childhood moments that make us cringe to this day, I didn't notice anything special from his flashbacks. I don't think he's so psychologically fragile either. Just a drama-queen. Pathetic.

reply

And, oh, so I'm the attention-seeker now. For a second there, I thought you were better than the others, but at least you mentioned it was just your assumption. Personally, I think that's kinda funny. Saying somebody online likes to draw a crowd is like going into a soup kitchen and calling the homeless greedy.

Also, I don't need you to set up a wikipedia link for me. I know what you meant by Projection. There is not a word, sentence, or concept you can illuminate for me, but thanks anyway.

reply

I suffer from dissociation and depersonalization and it is a challenge to get through every day.
This film was comforting.

Just_Jutt, are you trying to make the point that dissociative disorders aren't real? Or do you
have some inside knowledge to know that the writer of this film does not suffer from this?

You have made alot of comments that make it very clear that you don't know much about this subject
academically or experientially, yet you keep on debating as if you were an expert in this field.

Calling into question the mental health of another person, as if you know more than them and their experience is not very dignified, especially when you are clearly uninformed and misinformed on
the subject.


reply

The majority of people who suffer from dissociative disorders have experienced chronic levels
of sexual or physical abuse. It often happens at very young ages that they weren't old enough to
remember or it has been blocked out from memory to protect oneself.

Dissociation is actually a pretty clever and creative defense mechanism that the unconscious
creates to protect itself from trauma. Different personalities are created to protect oneself,
or a deep numbing that allows the child to survive abuse. Unfortunately, this protection also means
that one stops feeling, and being able to tell what is real and what is not real.

Hyper-vigilance to protect oneself from danger creates a chronic anxiety that is no different that PTSD. (In fact, they are the same symptoms.) Anxiety and panic can do some pretty intense things to the body, causing hallucinations, rapidly increased heart rate, etc.

Somebody could have been dissociating since they were 2 after some form of abuse, live 40 years with depression(via numbness), and then have a mid-life crisis, which ultimately shifts one's consciousness.
The last 40 years start to make sense in terms of mental illness and physical illness, and they vow to
try and manage their anxiety through a host of alternatives.

This is a hero's journey of trying to witness the abuses and/or traumas that have been too terrifying
to address.

If you have muliple voices in your head for years, or suffer from panic and anxiety attacks, or other
dysfunctional ways of coping with life; it is not possible to just turn these automated responses off.
It is also a daily challenge to know what is rea, and what is not real.

Mix that in with some other family dysfunctions such as alcoholism and chronic depression(parents)
and you have alot on your plate.

Watching this film made me cry a few times to see someone else experience the world in some of the ways that I perceive it.

reply

Uh, yeah, I know depersonalization is real and I don't need you to explain it.

Our hero never had multiple voices in his head, he didn't suffer panic attacks prior to the one in the movie (suspicious?), he didn't have any of those other "automated responses" during his lifetime; don't compare him to those people.

As mentioned in the film, he had never dealt with anything like it before. Period.

We're left to take his word for it. That he has DP. This kleptomaniac.

No, I'm still not convinced. Although, you're right, there are extremely rare cases of people developing depersonalization that late in life . . .

. . . it's still much more plausible that he's just a pathological liar, which often goes hand-in-hand with kleptomania anyway. Do you deny that?

Having a somewhat dysfunctional family and being depressed is nothing special in today's society, but that's all this guy moaned on and on about. He literally has nothing else to complain about in life and he just hates that. So, he lies. Pathetic.

reply

He is triggered when he smokes pot, becomes paranoid, and has a panic attack at the very beginning of the film. The pot initiates a shift in consciousness and some dormant trauma starts to work its from his unconscious to his conscious mind.

He is at a party at the beginning of the film, where he is first perceived by the female lead. He is very anxious, get up and leaves(probably to avoid a panic attack). She even relates this in her later dialogue.

He has a major anxiety attack in his parents bedroom and he has significant trouble breathing. He is taken to the hospital to help him come down from his attack. Those are a couple example just off the top of my head. It is also made quite clear that he barely leaves his house.

How do you know he didn't have automated responses? He was in a deep depression for most of his life. The film is called "Numb". The film focuses on when he finally starts to come into his own skin and realize how mentally ill he is. His perception of himself is trying to ground itself in reality. That's what the whole film is about. This film resonates with those of us that have this daily experience.

So your logic is that you cannot have a dissociative disorder and chronically steal pens? I have spent much time in inpatient and outpatient, psych group therapy. I have news for you, people who have mental illness
can have a host of illnesses, disorders, and dysfunctional personality traits all at the same time. In fact, it is rarely one thing, which is why it is so challenging to help them manage their lives.

I agree what having a dysfunctional family and being depressed is not uncommon. People who experience a temporary depression are not dealing with the same thing that a person who is clinically depressed. The same goes for anxiety. When it is all the time, and it never stops, life becomes very untolerable. This kind of depression where the world is colorless, tasteless, and you feel helpless
to feel again is the most terrifying place in the world.

Just-Jutt, your main point is that the character in this film is a liar about having a mental disorder. HE just "moans" and he is "pathetic". You also have intoned that the writer/director, in turn, is also lying.
For someone who doesn't seem to have much experience with people with dissociative disorders, you are sure definitive(and cursory) about who has one and who is a liar. Do you realize how your statements are ignorant and offensive? Especially in a discussion forum for a tiny movie, where a good portion of the people who visit are doing so because they might have a dissociative disorder.

reply

Quit ignoring my arguments, I'm not being ignorant and offensive, Chandler is for pretending to have a disorder that obviously affects many deeply.

My argument is not that you can't have depersonalization and still be a kleptomaniac. You know what, let me put it in all-caps this time, so maybe my point will get through to you:

I'M JUST SAYING, IT IS MUCH MORE LIKELY AND PLAUSIBLE THAT HE IS SIMPLY A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR (WHICH ALSO HAPPENS TO GO HAND-IN-HAND WITH KLEPTOMANIA) RATHER THAN ONE OF THE VERY FEW CASES OF PEOPLE TO DEVELOP DEPERSONALIZATION THAT LATE IN LIFE.

And his little freak-out with his friends at the beginning of the movie could easily be explained, considering it happens to many who don't often smoke that much chronic.

The doctor simply takes advantage of him later in the film by telling him what he wants to hear.

He avoids people and events because he's neurotic and a hermit, which is also nothing special in today's society, not because he's mentally ill (he isn't). And he's a writer for Christ's sake, of course he's going to be eccentric in some way.

The panic attack in his parents room was funny and unexpected, no? It was like that because here is a full-grown man who has never had a panic attack before, being cradled by this doctor in a hospital with a paper bag. He claims the panic attack was brought on by the disorder. Convenient that it happened while visiting his parents, yes? Pffft, he's faking, how does no one else see that? He wants attention and credibility, despite being boring. He's Napoleon Dynamite.

reply

You keep on saying "one of the very few cases of people to develop depersonalization in life" or that this is very rare. Actually, this is quite common, and one of the hallmarks of dissociative disorders.

A dissociate disorder is created by the body and unconscious as a defense mechanism so that a person can survive a situation or environment. This is most commonly initiated during the developing years(usually in a family environment), but can happen after. The body learns to dissociate from itself.
The consequence is the beginning of a numbing existence, which usually becomes a chronic depression.

As years go on, and traumas go unprocessed, the body often becomes dependent on this dysfunctionality
in situations that are not dangerous at all, because it is too traumatized to tell the difference. (People who experience PTSD often mistake safe situations for past, dangerous situations because they are unprocessed by the body and brain.) The irony of dissociative disorders is that body is attempting to protect itself from harm, but it is wildly overcompensating, leaving a person detached from their body.

Many of the side effects of dissociative disorders can be kept at bay for decades, if the person keeps themself numb. Then a moment can arrive 30 years later that triggers unprocessed trauma.

When this happens then their is an awakening and awareness, and the symptoms of dissociative disorders come more clearly to the surface for the person that is experiencing it.

This is what happened to the main character, he was triggered somehow and he realized that he has been mentally ill, but has been numbing it out to not deal with it. The problem is that it can eventually take
over your whole body if you continue to numb and numb. The trigger itself could be anything, it could be a dream, watching a person look a certain way at you, smoking pot. The most important aspect is that there is an awakening and a person becomes acutely aware of there mentally ill experience that was not seen before because of numbness.

This numbness can be pushed down farther with dependencies on drugs and alcohol, which makes it
even more repressed.

When he is looking at his hand and doesn't understand why it doesn't look like his hand or that he has any sensory connection with it, this can be very disturbing and cause further panic(or numbness to repress the panic and make it seem like you are just fine.)

Dissociating from your sensory experience for decades is quite common and logical.

-------------

A panic attack is NEVER funny. Your body goes into fight or flight and thinks its survival
is in jeopardy. Heart Rate increases, sweating, blood pressure, hyperventilating, hallucinations, not thinking it will ever stop. This a terrifying experience, and the panic usually compounds itself.

-------------

I see no evidence that he is lying about having depersonalization. If you experienced this, you would know that there is no way in hell that you would ever choose to feel so helpless.

Maybe he does want attention. That doesn't mean he doesn't have depersonalization disorder. They are not mutuallu exclusive. People with dissociative disorders can have all of the behaviours of a mentally healthy person and have their illness on top of that.

Don't you want love and attention from your family? Dpesn't everybody.

------------

I wish you well. This film obviously stirred you and agitates you enough to keep on fighting for this idea
that the main character is a liar. I don't understand why this is so important to you? You are really resistant to the idea that this person has a dissociative disorder for whatever reason. Let me ask you this. What is your experience with people with dissociative disorders prior to this film? What makes you so credible on this subject?

reply

James Joy, sorry to hear you've got the DP too, but don't waste your time on this guy, he's gonna come back at you with his nonsense jibber jabber until you give up, because he really doesn't have anything better to do with his time, as he said, he works at an internet cafe, so he sits online looking to pick fights. (Between making the cafe latte's i presume?) He claimed i was the one looking to pick fights but now we all know since he's attacked two people since i've stopped posting, this is not the case, the guy is the Buster Bluth of real life. " Punch me in the face punch me in the face" but when it comes time to do so, he falls to the ground in a fetus position. Tough behind the screen, meet him in person, he'd prob run away screaming for a graham cracker. Honestly, I really wish these conversations were in person, but, his life is obviously so unfulfilling that he keeps coming back, day after day, and fighting with new people. I gave up "fighting" with him because this is the internet, and his "valid points" were becoming stupid and irrelevant, Don't let him goat you into becoming another one of the people who he tries to put down because he's a tough guy behind that screen, he's a person who just wants to get a rise out of people, simple as that, and i can't wait for his response to this post because we ALL know he'll have one, unless he can find an ounce of dignity not to make himself look stupid, but, that is very unlikely.

reply

I don't think it is helpful to personally insult Just_Jutt.

The film, "Numb" is the only film that I know of that directly addresses a dissociative disorder. When you
can see somebody in a film or tv show that tackles something that you struggle with everyday, it can be very supportive of your experience. It makes you feel a little less crazy.

I think that is why Just-Jutt's statements might be taken personally by people on this board with dissociative disorders. Calling someone a liar is an attempt to invalidate their experience, and
undercut support and empathy; which is precisely the kind of atmosphere alot of people with dissociative disorders grew up in. So it can push your buttons. Not to mention that he is spreading misinformation about depersonalization.

It's totally fine, though. I am really happy that this movie is out here. It is so exasperating to try and verbalize a dissociative disorder t somebody. It has made me feel crazy constantly. Sometimes I feel like people are looking at me like I am insane. This film is a little morsel of being able to share with another person part of what your experience might be like.

I do feel that as I put in the daily work of trying keep my equilibrium balanced, I begin to see how the mechanisms of my behavior work more clearly, which ultimately allows me to feel less crazy and be able to communicate my experience without having to need any sympathy at all. But empathy and compassion always helps in any situation for anyone. We need more compassion for eachother. Peace out


reply

How can you say that when you know he's personally insulted anyone with depersonalization disorder? ps, are you a member of depersonalization.co.uk? just curious

reply

Hey, Drummer. Long time, no see. So, I'm the one with no life, eh?

Nice to see you back after being too mature to argue with me. Well, besides the other two posts you deleted. Nice to see you're keeping informed on all the latest posts as well. Wow.

You're just too funny, man. Yeah, business is slow, I got spare time. So, what? You're such a hypocrite.

Stop trying to act tough in cyberspace. And lattes are goddamn delicious.

reply

Now look, jamesjoyvideo, he doesn't have just any dissociative disorder here, he has depersonalization . . . or, so he claims anyway. And depersonalization, in particular, usually first onsets between 16 and 23, although there have been some even younger cases. I said it once, you misunderstood, I'll say it again: Depersonalization very rarely starts developing in your late thirties and you won't be able to find any research or data that disputes that fact.

Funny how that quack didn't bring that piece of information to Chandler's attention. He's clearly taking advantage of this neurotic, but financially successful, screenwriter.

Deep down, Chandler knows he's being taken advantage of. But, he keeps seeing the same doctor, like a person who would pay a fortune teller, he simply wants somebody to tell him what he wants to hear.

Panic attacks are obviously not funny. When Steve Coogan stepped on a land mine in Tropic Thunder and blew himself to bits, that was hilarious. Because it was a traumatic situation under humorous circumstances. That's why the panic attack scene was funny, because it was supposed to be. A grown man having a panic attack for the first time. He later hypothesized that this first panic attack was brought on by his depersonalization.

My point was, since it's unlikely he has depersonalization at all, I'm lead to believe that he faked the attack to get his parent's attention. Maybe he wanted to try and show them how screwed up they made him (sympathy, pity). If he faked that, he'd probably lie to keep it going and fake a lot more.

Look, I just see through the cracks in his story, that's all. I'm resistant to the idea that this person has depersonalization because it's not logical and am insulted that someone would pretend to have it.

Which he clearly is doing, for I can only assume, to seek attention and pity. You've all been played. In a sense, he's mocking people with true psychological disorders. Maybe that's why I'm so stirred-up and agitated by this character.

reply

Haha can you ever use any of your own arguments, i say your the one acting tough you turn it around on me, god damn man, get some originality in your life, and i see you can't not respond, like i said, you love to pick fights, with two random people, so at least i know its not me.

reply

I am so sick of hearing what typically happens with people with depersonalization, do you have it? if you do I would have most likely taken all your arguments into account, you act like you know everything about it which started all of this.

I have it, and yes, pot set it off, just like the movie, do i blame pot? No, it's a DORMANT condition that i've had my whole life. Its a form of SEVERE anxiety. You'd probably be more sensitive to the topic if you took 4mg of Klonopin daily just to feel normal again. Your insensitive and know nothing about the topic, the sad thing is, you know this, and you do it anyways. However, people like me and jamesjoy who have the issue take comfort in this movie, because it was virtually unknown to people like you until you saw it, but, that's fine, doesn't really matter. How's this, nothing you can say will change my mind, and nothing i can say will change your mind and vice versa, how about we agree to disagree, and if you can't handle that, than go eff yourself and have a nice life!

reply

So, you'd start taking me seriously if I had depersonalization? And it doesn't matter what I say, you'll never change your mind? Wow. You're so damn biased and closed-minded, you won't even admit the possibility that I might be right.

Of course you're gonna fight for a movie about depersonalization, despite all the holes in the story and how bad it really is. You're so impartial. I've admitted I might be wrong, just that it's more likely and plausible that I'm not.

And you keep talkin' about how much you'd want this conversation to be face-to-face, knowing full-well that's not gonna happen. That's not acting tough? Loser.

reply

I wasn't diagnosed with depersonalization til I was in my 30's. The support groups that I attend for depersonalization, I am usually the youngest or second youngest one there.

Tropic Thunder is a dark comedy. This film is clearly not, and it is based on somebody's personal experience. And by the way, that scene when he has a panic attack in his childhood house and hyperventiliates on his parents floor and his mother turns her back on him is not funny. It is an
exposition of character to help the audience understand the relationship he has with his mother, and her
awful parenting. It also reveals how his dad is his only form of support within his family, which helps to explain why he is so fearful of his death.

The majority of the film we spend with the lead character, he is alone. He is not attempting to illicit sympathy from anyone. He has cut himself off from the world and has fears of leaving his house. He is frightened of the world.

The people who live with it, have scoured the subject for years, and use outpatient group support to help understand their behavior have a hell of a lot more credibility than you.

If you were wise you would listen to learn more about this mental illness and show some curiousity. You show ZERO curiousity, and insteaduse all your energy to be combative and prove you are right.
Your argument doesn't hold any water. It doesn't even make sense.

I am not going to respond to you anymore. You are not worth the energy to try and share with, or even converse with.

reply

haha you said the exact same thing about the conversation being in person, actually i believe you were the one who first said " too bad it's not" So whose the hypocrite now?

reply

You are. That was my response to the post you made before it:

"I wish this wasn't online, I guarantee this conversation would be much different in person."

Try to remember what you type.

reply

The movie is a Romantic Comedy and that scene was supposed to be funny. His own mom won't even take his BS seriously. I'm not trying to diminish your struggle, okay. People tend to go to support groups later in life anyway, just because you don't see any young people at these groups, doesn't mean they don't make up a majority of the problem. That's like saying young people can't be alcoholics because they're hardly ever seen at AA meetings. He's faking.

Sure, he's lonely and neurotic, so are a lot of people. I'm not gonna feel sorry for him just because he's a hermit.

A study of depersonalization by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry in New York found that the illness typically onsets at the age of 16. I don't need credibility if the facts are on my side.

Here's a link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14628973

reply

Oh trust me, i remember typing that, without a doubt, but I don't recall saying, "too bad it isn't." At least i admit to what i say, you're just as bad as me if not worse acting "tough" behind the computer screen, so don't come preaching like you're better than me, But you know what, Just-Jutt, you win, you came here with the notion to piss people off and stir *beep* up that you know nothing about, and hey, you accomplished that, my hat's off to you sir. I have no idea what you are going to do now, who are you gonna fight with now I wonder? Cause I'm done with you, james joy had it right when he said you aren't worth the time. Oh well, not my problem, congratulations, i mean that. See ya.

reply

So . . . now let me get this straight . . . you go on about how much you wish this conversation was in person, I agree with you, and suddenly I'm the instigator? Prick.

And only after about a month of bickering, you've decided I'm not worth your time?

Man, I forgot how hilarious you can be. Peace, brother. Thanks for the laughs.

reply

Haha wow i haven't checked this since march, and yet i come back and see this *beep* from quite the tool named Just Jutt. Yes, it was a pathetic main character. Did you watch the movie? that's what it was supposed to be, and look Mr. Internet Cafe bitch, you mentioned the in person conversation first, and trust me i'd love it. But, I Guarantee your too much of a pussy to fly to WORCESTER MASSACHUSETTS, yep thats where i live, come here, and we can finish this conversation man on bitch, me being the man, you being the bitch, But since you have a vagina, i know this wont happen, so, i guess i'll wait for your typical reply which holds no ground and NO BALLS! CANT WAIT!

reply

Heh-heh ... heh heh heh. Ha ha ha ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHA ... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

... Christ, that was good. I needed that.

reply

hahaha and i needed that, proves my point, no balls, thanks!

reply

Get help. It was funny at first, but at this point I'm seriously concerned for your mental well-being. You need to stop checking these boards on a daily basis, screaming "no balls!" at your computer screen, looking for a fight.

Do you think I'm insane like you? You think I got no balls 'cause I don't wanna go to a randomly selected city to settle some stupid online debate (and Chandler was most definitely pathetic ... but not in any way the writer intended him to be).

Also, you were the first one to write how much you wanted this conversation to be in person, you know you were. So, on top of everything else, you're imaging things to justify physical violence? Freaking nuts.

Use your words, man.

reply

Do you think I'm insane like you?


I think you're worse. Having a mental illness is something that can't be helped. Being an attention seeking bully *beep* is something that can be helped.

You have come onto an imdb board about a movie about a mental illness, no surprise that you will find alot of mentally ill people here sharing stories etc.

You have posted deliberately provocative posts and are getting kicks out of arguing about them. One of the biggest conflicts inside someone with one of these disorders is to "snap out of it", "toughen up" and that you are worrying too much about nothing. By saying that you think this character is faking it, you are also saying by default that all the other people who have the same condition are faking it. This is similar to going to a rape forum and saying that people who are raped were asking for it. Because when someone is raped their feeling of themselves is so low, that on some level they believe that. It's the same with this. It's a soft spot. One of the biggest things with these type of things are that you are your own worst enemy. People don't need turds like you rubbing it in even more.

In our society, it's easier to come of the gay closet, then it is to come out with a mental illness.

You are worse then all the "insane faking it" people here combined. At least these people are brave enough to try and face up to their problems and try to fix them.

You were looking for attention and for an arguement when you made this topic. You didn't respond to the calm responses. You responded to the ones who you knew would argue back. And now you are crying because the DP people you are arguing with are "looking for a fight"?

Mental midget.

reply

"This is similar to going to a rape forum and saying that people who are raped were asking for it."

Harsh, dude. Me thinking Chandler is faking it does not mean anything else by default. It means I think Chandler is faking it. My problem is with the character, not any other underlining issue you and others may have imagined. Seriously, what's with you people and putting all these words in my mouth. Sheeesh.

And the DrummerBoy here IS insane. But I'm not making fun of his DP or whatever issues he's got, I'm responding to his sometimes ludicrous comments. I haven't insulted anyone who hasn't insulted me first.

People just don't like what I have to say, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong or even a bad person. There's nothing wrong with being amused by people getting worked up over text in cyberspace. And once again, how does this make me an attention seeking bully? This is a barely visited online message board only a small handful of anonymous users have responded to. Sorry if I hurt anyone's feelings with my opposing opinions concerning a piece of fiction. Just don't dish-out what you can't take.

reply

You are the biggest hypocrite I've ever seen. Like i said, i hadn't checked this thing since March, and then i randomly come across it because it had been bookmarked and you respond at the drop of a hat. I will admit, saying come fight me is retarded, because it won't happen, but the difference between you and I is I can admit when I'm wrong, I'm not the only one whose called you out on this board and yet you have still attempted to back up your bull each time. I think you need to admit to yourself that you did come on here looking for a fight, and saying that you didn't insult anyone who didn't insult you first is nonsense, and everyone on here including you, knows this, so your just as "insane" as me.

reply

Decided to do some easy digging to prove that you come onto IMDB purely to insult people, and low and behold look what i found!

"Also try using capitalization; it's as easy as holding the 'shift' button when typing a letter."

Close, but this is the correct punctuation for that sentence:

"Also, try using capitalization. It's as easy as holding the Shift button when typing."

A comma after "capitalization" would've worked, too. But, don't give up. Read that grammar and punctuation book of yours one more time, semicolons are hard. Even Kevin Smith had a hard time with them, remember that sign in the first Clerks? "I assure you; we're open." lol

And I'm pretty sure you're smart enough to understand the poster really meant "supposed."

Pretentious prick.

But, I did really like the episode.

Case in Point, one of your "other posts" Looks here like you're looking to insult this kid, unless pretentious prick is a compliment where you're from, i'm not the one who needs help, you just may be able to articulate what you want to say better, but we both know you're the guy yelling at the computer trying to make yourself feel better by pissing people off, in most cases, that'd be cause to "get help". Oh and for the record, I say where i live because unlike you I'm not afraid, and dont hide behind my computer. You have not once done anything but dodge that subject or try to throw it back on me. I sincerely feel sorry for you, but your just an *beep* there's a ton of people that have to fight with others to make there mundane lives better for that little second. By now this is all a moot point, I couldn't care less if you think "chandler" is pathetic, just trying to help you realize your not right about everything like you think you are, but, that's most likely never going to happen.

reply

Yeah, I like to check my post-history whenever I'm on IMDb, but that doesn't make me obsessive like you.

When I saw your July post, I thought it was hilarious and replied, and when I saw your response to my message the very next day, I thought it was even funnier. What were you doing for those two weeks, just anxiously waiting?

And when I brought it up, I liked how you stayed away for a few days to prove me wrong.

At least I don't have this board bookmarked.

I know how much you want to meet me in person (which is weird all on its own) and that me not wanting to meet you in a city I can't possibly know is your hometown somehow makes me the coward hiding behind a computer, but that's just stupid. It makes no sense. And you call me the hypocrite. Also, who continues arguing after admitting to being wrong?

It's both creepy and funny that you're desperately checking my Family Guy message board postings for a stupid remark, 'cause I'm betting you couldn't find one here. I like the one you finally went with. Out of context, it does kinda make me seem like a douche, despite that I was actually defending another poster.

You're too much. This went from funny to sad to funny again.

reply

HA that was the FIRST post of yours i clicked on, i saw it responding to another person and thought, well let me guess, he's being a douche to another person, and i was right. You've done it plenty in these boards, even to the guy who posted above me, but we've all seen that, i'm just trying to prove you come on here trying to insult people, stop acting like you're above it, that's the really sad part.

Secondly I have a computer that bookmarks the sites i've gone to the most, so anytime i would type in IMDB, it would say "most pathetic main character" Unfortunately like you I found it entertaining enough to go to enough, don't act like you're better than that either, you've come on just as much if not more than me. Nice try tho tool.

reply

And the DrummerBoy here IS insane.


Well it takes two to tango. Especially in a long drawn out arguement like this that keeps going on and on and on.

I am not going to read over every word you have said, come up with some rebuttals. I am sorry to say that this topic is a only a minor event in my life. Got better things to do.

reply

Agreed, I dunno if JJUTT insulted you as well, but thank you for agreeing it takes two to tango, i agreed that a LONG time ago, this kid thinks he can say whatever the hell he wants and he's never wrong, basically, he thinks he's a girl, jjutt, you want a sex change? I'm sure you can afford it on that internet cafe salary of yours.

reply

guys guys guys.. seriously opposite corners. I don't generally get in the midddle of flames.. but there are FAIR points on both sides here that neither one of you are willing to see.. because you both have your own very personally held reasons for them. NOT having this disorder, or.. what have you.. I can't really relate.. but as from what I can tell most of the symptoms whould have..at some point been.. maybe not apparents.. but they should have manifested themselves, to some degree at a younger age.. if I am reading these posts correctlr?

Now.. Jutt Jutt.. while being kind of bullheaded about it. is NOT saying that the condition does not exist, as several members of this board have very muchly demonstrated. His contention is the character MAY or may NOT (his side) suffering from it.

The condition is brought on after a night of smoking pot. Now I don't know HOW this condition manifests, yet again..although its clearly been established that pot can bring its latent effects to the surface.. yes?

What Jutt Jutt HAS been point out.. is that there was no prior indication of a problem (not meaning much.. as problems CAN go unnoticed..although likely there would have been some hint of a problem.. and this isn't covered in the film I take it?).

And.. I think you ALL seem to agree the character is quite neurotic? possibly hypochondriac perhaps? Now the point of the doctor NOT being able to help after an extended period of time.

Well honestly.. it sounds like this character does NOT seek a second medical/psychological opinion? That may just have been skipped over.. but this would be something you'd EXPECT. if you are diagonosed with something. you should make sure you do have it.

Doctors sadly are incentivized, another point brought up, to push certain drugs.. and telling a man who.. might have just had a SIMPLE panic attack (it happens.. I've been having trouble this week.. and been taking something to keep myself calm, and I HATE meds. its just some personal family issues.. and I don't believe will be a recurring problem. just not able to keep myself relaxed).

BUT.. let's just say.. Is it POSSIBLE this doctor could be diagnosing a disorder or condition to sell prescription drugs? We've seen plenty of studies on how many children now are on "anti depressants.. mood elevators.. ridlin, and the like. over the last few years.

Now this doctor tells this already neurotic character.. who MAY have just bad a bad experience with marijuana that he may have this condition.. it wouldn't be unlikely that he could obsess over and perhaps even unconsciously manifest these symptoms?

I am just asking if this is out of the realm of possibility. If someone thinks they are sick.. or have something..might they not start to think. and even possibly act it out? Even in a NORMAL (yes.. I know a very loaded word) person. The power of suggestion can be quite potent. But couple that with a neurotic personality. or hypochondriac.. it could be quite dibilitating.

ON THE OTHER HAND..

He smokes pot.. we don't know if this was the first time.. or is possibly just (as it has been said he smoked ALOT?). That perhaps its NOT just pot.. but perhaps the AMOUNT of pot, at one time, that crated a kind of.. open window for the condition to begin to manifest itself.

Those are the two arguments.. and I can appreciate the level of.. fervor and passion on each side FOR them.. but must it be this side is always right and wrong?

Jutt Jutt did make some off hand comments. that may have come off wrong.. but he is NOT dismissing the existence of the condition. Just tht he believed the chracter as shown may not have HAD It.. but being a reclusive.. and neurotic.. may have latched onto it as.. well an answer.. the reason he felt the way he did.. but may have taken it too far. As. if you think you have something.. you can begin to. unconsciously act it, even if you don't. The word placebo effect.. not quite right, was used. Is it possible that a doctor misdiagnosed a character who was prone to take things overboard? I think its a valid argument.. and something we should look into. As I think prescription abuse by DOCTORS is much worse a problem tham we tend to realize. And an unscrupulous doctor may have seen the character in his fragile state as an easy mark.

Although.. I myself too would find it strange he did NOT seek a second opinion.. Jutt Jutt was NOT denying the existence of the condition, just that it was possible he did not have it

While its empowering to see yourself on the screen.. and I find it very much a.. not vindication.. But there is something for someone having realized something. and showing a part of the world that people and conditions that aren't common.

Now.. the onset of the disease is usually younger.. but.. the word is USUALLY. Doesn't mean it couldn't manifest itself at ANY age. And.. JUST smoking pot.. may not have triggered it. but smoking ALOT of pot? possible could have.

I think its important to look at the film from both sides.. and realize both could be right or wrong. The condition is REAL.. Jutt Jutt is NOT saying it doesn't exist.. just that he felt the main character's neurotic nature and subsequent nature. which it sounds like the film has the kind of over typified Hollywood woman makes it all better ending? Would make me wonder as well.. as most of the posters talk about daily medication required to fight the symptoms? was he still on that medication when the film ended?

Like I said.. I haven't seen the film.. but have always enjoyed Perry's work.. and ran across a link about the film on another board.. Anyway.. peace be with all of you guys.. its a hard fight.. one that I know I can't possibly understand.

reply

Possible Spoiler **********************************

I agree with the original poster. The film had great potential and I could sort of buy that this hot, unattached woman would be interested in the main character. It was a stretch though and I doubt women would be interested in someone cuz they "look lonely" paricularly in LA. But nevertheless, Perry is a handsome lead so I let it go. But then the penlifting scene came and it was just too much. Like this woman is going to put up with all these red flags. I'm sure she could find better. Then all the awkward profanity seemed out of place for a film trying to be so touching and deep. Just didn't work for me.

reply

Mcgill, i totally agree with everything you said, Just Jutt really just was looking to pick a fight, and thats what he did. I'll agree he was neurotic the main character and yes i did have symptoms early on in life, it was just dormant until the pot set it off. I was neurotic when first diagnosed. I just get very upset when people look for fights over something that was so hard to deal with and they've never experienced it, this fight went way beyond what we were originally even talking about. But, it take two to tango.

reply

I'm baaaaaaack.

Thanks Mcgill and SillyPuddy for the positive reinforcement.

At this point, I'm starting to sound like a broken record. So, I'll just try and make my closing arguments on the subject and repeat myself one last time ... I hope. And I know how precious your time is, Jon364. Wouldn't want you to spend more than a few minutes reading.

- Fact: Symptoms of depersonalization usually onset by 16, not at Chandler's age.
- If he compulsively steals, it's logical to assume he would compulsively lie.
- Despite knowing not to continue seeing a doctor for the same problem for more than a few weeks, he does so anyway and without results. The doctor's simply telling him what he wants to hear and profiting from it.
- The doctor shows no real concern for Chandler, giving him prescriptions that don't work and even falling asleep during one of their sessions. He's clearly only interested in this man's cheque book.
- His parents were obviously caught off-guard when he came to them in the night during an apparent panic attack. Does one randomly start getting those in their thirties as well? He obviously wanted their attention. It's like he was going through that "showing your parents how badly they messed you up" phase a lot of emo kids go through. Maybe he was having some kind of weird midlife crisis. I just know he never had DP.
- Fact: Marijuana does not have any long-term psychological effects. Whatever he felt before seeing that quack would have to have been short-term. Notice how at one point in the movie he tries to supposedly cure his disorder by smoking more pot?
- If he wasn't consciously deceiving people, he was either completely delusional or in utter denial over being normal. This guy really, really likes being noticed. Understandable. Well, more understandable than suddenly developing DP that late in life.
- Despite his success, normal family, dream career and dream girlfriend, he desperately seeks a way to stand out and bitch about life. If that doesn't make him pathetic, and not just pathetic, but douchebag-pathetic, I don't know what does.
- Just gotta mention, I'm not against anyone with depersonalization, just Chandler. And I'm convinced he's faking for reasons previously stated and that would be appalling to anybody who'd think likewise.

And DrummerBoy:

- I literally could not understand how it would even be possible for one to try and start a physical fight online, but you managed to figure it out. Aware of the anonymity offered by these message boards, you still egg on a face-to-face encounter and even go so far as to nearly give me your home address. Seriously, dude? There's an enormous difference between picking a fight and stirring up some posters. At least I'm only guilty of the latter.
- I never get tired of your explanations and really appreciate you taking the time to clear up my misinterpretations of how you spend your time. And that's not just sarcasm.
- I'm not acting like anything. How exactly does my text act? I can't control how you interpret what I write. If my perplexity toward some of your more stupid comments comes off as condescending ;) or if my opposing opinions make it seem as though I'm somehow acting tough in cyberspace (which is just dumb), I apologize. But yes, I can be quite insulting to those who insult.
- I'm the one who's never wrong?! Are you kidding? You're just as bad as me! I wouldn't be so consistent if I didn't think I was right. Glad to see you at least have a firm grasp of the obvious.
- No, I would not like a sex change. Thanks for asking ... I guess.
- And yes, it does take two to tango. Having said that, I'm still a lot less nutso than you.

Peace, everybody.

reply

I'm baaaaaaack.


Still as much as a tosser as ever.

I don't know why you ever cared about this movie so much. You don't even have Depersonalisation Disorder. I completely forgot I had even watched it (or that you existed) until I just rewatched it 10 mins ago. Your first post about it was in April 2009! And you argued about it for 18 months. WTF.

reply

Yea, the reason I got pissed off at this dbag is because he hasn't been through it, yet he comments on it like he has. Probably the most ignorant person in the world if you ask me. If JJUTT went through this *beep* he'd probably piss himself, but no, he'd rather start *beep* on IMDB with people who have really been through this. I hate people who comment on things when they literally have NO IDEA what they are talking about. He can read any book and all the statistics he wants, but until you feel like real life is a dream, your still an ignorant *beep*

reply

Also, i'm not the only one who has had a dispute with Just Jutt in this forum. He just responds with "you're a loser, or you're a dick" kid is probably 15 years old. I thought at first i was the only one, but if many people disagree with you and your still a dickmouth, maybe you should try and realize that you were wrong, However, i know you're one of those people who is "never wrong."

reply

[deleted]

Wow, more responses! This board is just too damn fun.

Where to start this time ... I guess I should respond to Shelly's comments first: It does sound like your experiences with depersonalization are authentic and I apologize if you got the impression that I'm somehow dismissing the disorder altogether or the people who suffer from it.

As mentioned in my previous post, my beef is merely with the poor portrayal of depersonalization in this film and nothing else. I can appreciate the tremendous strides you've obviously had to make in your life from such an early age and I applaud you for it. However, we cannot simply dismiss the fact that Matthew Perry's character was not 13 when he first experienced his supposed symptoms.

You can't argue that depersonalization doesn't just appear out of nowhere in your late thirties. It is a psychological disorder that usually onsets in your teens. Thus, it would only be logical to assume that his actions throughout the remainder of this movie are completely disingenuous and would be more accurately described as classic neurosis and/or hypochondria. And I simply cannot let that stand.

I would never, nor have I ever, told anyone suffering from a serious mental illness to just "get over it" or that they're "pathetic" for being that way, though many people on this board seem to really wish I would.

If you take the time to read my posts, you'll notice I've never actually insulted anyone who hasn't insulted me first. I can understand why people might get upset, but don't expect me to just sit back and take that kind of abuse. As cliche as it is, don't dish out what you can't take.

I've been misunderstood, misquoted, called some very nasty names, accused of even nastier deeds, and even threatened with physical violence since I've made my first post and I don't plan on scurrying away anytime soon. I've decided to continue defending my opinions whether anyone likes it or not.

Now, don't think I've forgotten about you, DrummerBoy.

"He just responds with 'you're a loser, or you're a dick' ..." What an elegant summarization of my posts.

I will admit, however, that I don't respond gleefully to comments like "I got pissed off at this dbag ... If JJUTT went through this *beep* he'd probably piss himself, but no, he'd rather start *beep* on IMDB ... people disagree with you and your [sic] still a dickmouth ..."

Your such an ignorant hypocritical douchebag it's not even funny ... Alright, it's still a little funny.

Oh, and suck my balls, Jon364. Yeah, I can be a bit eccentric :)

reply

WOW, what happened to "I'm done, see ya" or whatever the hell you posted. You've come at personally more than one person on this board, and yes, your "elegant" responses are usually your a douche bag, or for instance in this last post, "suck my balls" VERY MATURE,I mean how old are you? Pretty sure older men with the mind of middle school aged kids shouldn't be commenting. I don't even care what you have to say anymore, I just feel the need to comment when I come on this board every few months to show you that you're the one trying to get a rise out of people. Yes, you pissed me off, Yes, i said stupid *beep* (at least I'm man enough to admit it, unlike you) but you're no better than me in that respect, you need to realize your not "above" this like you claim to be. In your words, "you are an ignorant douchebag" who knows NOTHING about this problem, and starts *beep* with people who have a lot of knowledge on it, but hey, there are dumb-asses' like you in the world for a reason I guess.

reply

Yeah, that was supposed to be my last time repeating myself, but you guys make it hard.

There's literally nothing in your last post I haven't already commented on.

I can be immature and still be right. Facts are facts. So ... suck my balls.

reply

Haha, don't want to be the first and last to do that, have a good time finding someone who will though!

reply

Oh, you don't have to be the first or last one to suck my balls, you can have at it whenever you please :)

reply

I don't get why you care so much Just Jutt.. about this movie.. or about what anyone here thinks.

A look on your profile and this movie is pretty much all you post about in the last 12 months. How sad is that. See you in 2 years time? lol

The only other show I see is Kenny vs Spenny.. at least we can agree that that show is ok. And that Spenny is David Schwimmer with down syndrome.

Watch some more shows or movies man.. seriously.

reply

Really? I thought I made it clear why I'm so passionate about this topic like three posts ago.

Pay attention, dude. This isn't about the movie anymore, it's about not backing down. Where would we be today if people with unfavourable opinions just gave in to any opposition? This film is a sham and must be stopped.

Besides, this whole debate is just too hilarious, I can't walk away yet.

And you should be more sensitive, man. Kenny vs Spenny is a good show, but Down Syndrome is a serious disorder :P ... Stop being such hypocritical douches, maybe then you'll see less of me.

reply

*Yawn*

reply

... he writes nine months later to emphasize his disinterest, totally oblivious to the irony :D

reply

[deleted]