No, it wasn't a dumb thing to mention...I wondered a bit, too. There really was no reason for her to have the accent--nothing relevant to the plot, I mean. It seems they simply wanted her to use it, and figured it would be believable. The question remains as why she'd have been where she was, but I suppose anything's possible. I'm all for making carefully calculated choices regarding the details of a film/story so that (almost) everything serves the plot in some way, but then again, a bit of random diversity now and then does mirror reality. *shrug* So I'm not sure of the answer here, if there is one; it might have simply been the personal preference and decision of one of the filmmakers.
As for how good her accent was...gah, I laugh so hard every time I read comments about how "awful" actors' accents are. Apparently it must just be considered "cool" to insult and deride every accent done by an actor who doesn't speak that way naturally--even when they're barely distinguishable from a native speaker, and as if all people with a certain type of accent sound exactly the same, meaning that a slight deviation from theirs is automatically "horrible." I don't know that I can think of a single instance in which an imitated accent was praised, or at least, not bashed by somebody who found it inaccurate and poorly done. And yet very, very few of them are actually as "off"-sounding as these critics' scathing words would imply. I'm not saying that hers was perfect here, but for CRYING out loud, the inevitable "terrible accent" bandwagon is truly pathetic.
reply
share