MovieChat Forums > Rogue (2007) Discussion > Good movie until...

Good movie until...


This was a good movie until the hero found the heroine alive. Nobody else survived an attack, why did she? I still give it a fair rating.

reply

Well, they'd mentioned that it would stuff the prey somewhere til later. I'm assuming most were stuffed under the water whereas she happened to be stuffed into its lair. She would've eventually been eaten or bled out and died, but I didn't find it impossible to believe.

What I found retarded was what the writers did to the dog. It stayed calm throughout the movie when others were being attacked and eaten. It never rushed into the water barking hysterically. Yet it abandons its owner and runs into the darkness barking at the giant croc and is promptly eaten. What was the point of that?

reply

Well I believe the dog runs off not in the hopes of abandoning its owner, rather to try to intimidate the croc.......not that it turned out to well for the canine.

reply

i was so mad the dog died but not the tourists UGH

---------------
Hey Laser Lips Yo Momma Was A Snow Blower - Johnny 5

reply

I know!!!! The dog dying mad me soooo mad and sad, poor thing. It freakin saved its owners life too then gets killed, grrrr. I could care less when the people died but not the dog!!!!! I would have been sooo pissed if one of those tourists made the owner use that poor dog as bait, glad she refused but I was surprised she didnt even seem to care about her dog at the end, i mean she didnt even ask if he was alright or anything, wtf.

"Do not the most moving moments of our lives find us without words ?" ~ Marcel Marceau

reply

"I know!!!! The dog dying mad me soooo mad and sad, poor thing. It freakin saved its owners life too then gets killed, grrrr."

But that is one of the most defining characteristics of "man's best friend". They are willing to risk their lives to loyally defend their masters. I thought the dog dying in "Rogue" was both accurate and beautiful. The guy never would have found the girl if it weren't for the dog. In essence, it traded its life for its master. Maybe sad, but beautiful-sad, not depressing-sad.

~Atticus "depressing-sad makes me bilious" Lennux

reply

[deleted]

I know exactly what you mean! I remember as a kid watching cowboy movies, I'd always be worried that the horses would get shot or hit with arrows. I didn't care so much about the humans!


"... and now I'm off to some charity B.S for knocked up teenage sluts."

reply

Because
1) the Croc was already tired from pulling so hard at the fishbate thing.
2) she knew how to hold her breath under water
3) she knew everything about crocodiles, so she might have had quite an advantage there and held herself in place when the croc moved her around.
4) she had a special vest and outfit, considering her job

I don't think it's even remotely weird she survived the attack.
You're just an idiot who can't think that well.

reply

I had a huge problem with how the writing went. To have your main character who's got the top billing litteraly passed out for the last 20 min of the movie I thought was really dumb and couldnt make sense of it not to mention she should have been dead. Also when Michael Vartan's character got seperated from the other survivors and went into the cave the other survivors totally disappeared from the movie and were completely forgotten about and never shown again until they were rescued at the end. I didnt understand why the writers did that and I thought it was a huge plot hole/flaw.
The last 20 min of the movie is just 1 man in a cave vs. the crocodile and there were other characters still alive and they were mysteriously off screen or either passed doing absolutely nothing and I just couldnt get past that or make sense of it.

reply

"Also when Michael Vartan's character got seperated from the other survivors and went into the cave the other survivors totally disappeared from the movie and were completely forgotten about and never shown again until they were rescued at the end. I didnt understand why the writers did that and I thought it was a huge plot hole/flaw. "

I thought that was very realistic, actually.

In a typical monster movie, you'd probably see every remaining character struggling to the very end to escape the monster, while it continued picking them off in an increasingly gruesome manner.

In real life, it's often unlikely that every individual present at the start of an event will remain relevant to that event through to its resolution. I would think that this notion would be especially true for a real life croc attack. There would certainly be groups of people who would scatter when they saw their chance to get away. Why would we care to know about them beyond that point?

~Atticus "Gimme some sugar, baby" Lennux

reply

I agree the last 20 mins was a joke......
otherwise pretty good movie up til that point.

reply

"Because
1) the Croc was already tired from pulling so hard at the fishbate thing.
2) she knew how to hold her breath under water
3) she knew everything about crocodiles, so she might have had quite an advantage there and held herself in place when the croc moved her around.
4) she had a special vest and outfit, considering her job

I don't think it's even remotely weird she survived the attack.
You're just an idiot who can't think that well."



LOL. One day when you're a little older and wiser, you'll realize who the true idiot is after you reread your own post. Read a little about the eating habits of saltwater crocks, and you'll understand why there is no way in hell she would have survived. Especially with a crock that size. Really enjoyed this movie though.

PS.. Radha Mitchell deserved to live anyway. When a woman is that hot looking, she deserves to live.

Besides, she paid the price in "Pitch Black".

reply

The croc had eaten how many people by now? Probably wasn't hungry anymore. Crocs are known for putting their food in caches for later. Mostly so that they decompose and become easier to digest. It doesn't give a damn if the food is still alive. It'll die eventually, and she would have if she hadn't been found.


Wasting is what humans do best. I'm just excelling in my field.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Actually the movie was good until they got off the island. After that it went for the Hollywood ending (heroine miraculously alive, hero alone against the monster, hero somehow finds the monster's lair, goes alone into dark cave after animal, etc.). It was still taunt at the end, but harder to suspend disbelief.

After watching it I would have been more satisfied if, once they got off the island, they stayed together and the croc kept trying to pick them off one by one and they were trying to keep moving and get out of its territory. Since they don't know how far that "territory" is, they would just keep trying to get as far away from that island and back towards civilization as they could. Finally, the few stragglers would make it back and be rescued, but not before most of the survivors were picked off one by one. That to me would have been more entertaining and far more realistic than the "city slicker against big croc" ending.

reply

"After that it went for the Hollywood ending (heroine miraculously alive, hero alone against the monster, hero somehow finds the monster's lair, goes alone into dark cave after animal, etc.)"

"After watching it I would have been more satisfied if, once they got off the island, they stayed together and the croc kept trying to pick them off one by one and they were trying to keep moving and get out of its territory. Since they don't know how far that "territory" is, they would just keep trying to get as far away from that island and back towards civilization as they could. Finally, the few stragglers would make it back and be rescued, but not before most of the survivors were picked off one by one."

That actually sounds more "Hollywood" to me. Nothing like watching an hour of people getting eaten.

Myself, I was impressed with how realistic the chain of events in this movie were. I kept thinking the whole way through: "This is probably a lot like it would be in real life" (in comparison to other monster movies, and perhaps not the way the croc was killed, though that was fun anyhow).

As to your point about the hero and heroine, I've stated my opinion on that in a response to the OP.

~Atticus "hail to the king, baby" Lennux

reply

I agree, but not for the same reasons. Way I figured it, the Croc had just eaten the dad, so Rhada was like a catch to eat later. She was the expert, so she probably knew that if she survived the attack to just hold her breath and maybe it wouldnt eat her right away. People HAVE survived before.

I just thought that when the film became ONE man against the croc it lost some steam, but overall a very nice thriller!

And it didnt look 100% fake like the one in PRIMEVIL!

reply

Considering that croc did a full-on "death roll" when it grabbed her, I kind of find it ridiculous she survived as well.

reply

"This was a good movie until the hero found the heroine alive. Nobody else survived an attack, why did she?"

I'm always a bit confounded by this sort of response. People are so often surprised when the main character survives something that all the more marginal characters were not so lucky with. It isn't coincidence.

In the case of this particular film, people DO survive crocodile attacks quite often, and yes, even the dreaded death roll. This croc itself had just eaten, what, three grown men? (hell, that's not even counting whoever had sent up the flare earlier) It makes perfect sense to store a to-go meal in the fridge for the midnight munchies. And keep in mind, while this girl survived, it was only just barely, and she certainly didn't survive *well*. She'll likely be recovering and going through physical rehab for months.

"But Mr. Lennux, you brainless oaf, why should the main character just happen to be this survivor?" you ask me.

Look at it this way. Think of the camera as a phantom witness to the events of a story, a witness who already knows how it will turn out (in a way, it does). It knows who will play the most important roles throughout, so focuses on those individuals from the very beginning, in essence making them main characters.

Now that's a silly way to look at it, but it translates. How's this for a logical thought process for a film-maker?:

1) Get a good plot idea for a movie (likely by watching an older movie that already used said idea).
2) Get drunk and develop the character designs and progressions.
3) Pinpoint the character that suffers the most gruesome death at the earliest point in the plot.
4) Drop acid and decide to give that character top billing, the best lines, and most screen-time.

I think you'd be a little more bothered by that sort of plot. Maybe not, you could be a unique fellow.

~Atticus "likes the word *fellow*" Lennux

reply

Am I the only one surprised that there was only one crocodile that needed to die in this movie?

"Death is too easy for you, BITCH!...I want you to suffer."

reply

Extreme territorialism.

It was addressed frequently throughout the flick.

~Atticus "no snappy middle name this time" Lennux

reply

my only problems were sam worthington and the dog dying. this movie was at least better than lake placid

reply

PrincesssTwinkie fûck you a$$hole

The Expendables13 August 2010 http://tezone.cwahi.net/

reply

Really dumb. Crocs drown their victims, they don't store them alive.

But who cares? Jaws was extremely unbelievable as well. But the tension and horror was excellent, so we all bought it. Rogue is not at all on that level, but fun enough that I'll let these dumb *beep* pass. I have more fun that way, you know, by not being an anal nerd.

reply

I really enjoyed the ending. I'll admit that I would have rather had the dog live than the girl, but having the main protagonist accidentally entire the Croc's den made for some pretty intense moments.

reply

"PrincesssTwinkie fûck you a$$hole"Forgot about you Barney-Ross. Hadn't read you on imdb for quite a while. Didn't miss you. I see that you're still a retarded prick (of truly massive proportions), clearly nothing ever changes. Seriously, what a complete and utter twat you really are...

reply