I watched both in the same week, the US version mainly as a comparison to the UK version. Yes, I enjoyed the UK version more, but maybe because that was the version I watched first, but also it had 6 hours of tele-play against the 2 hours of film?
There was, in the British version, more time to develop the characters(eg the politician / wife / journalist relationship), more sub-plots (eg the politician boss' involvement; the threatened newspaper injunction; false drug accusations; the sassy newspaper PA)) and it seemed less conspiracy-plot formulaic.
Also, the believable acting of Nighy and Morrissey in the UK version left the acting of Mirren and Affleck for dead (maybe because there was more time for character development in the UK version?).
But I think the Foy character was better rendered in the US version and there seemed to be a gaping plot hole, or unresolved plot point, when the murderer is killed in the British version.
And why the 'bogeyman' in the British version is an oil company and the 'bogeyman' in the US version is a military contractor probably reflects the cultural differences between the two countries (although I found the military contractor angle tied in better with the overall story line).
reply
share