MovieChat Forums > Push (2009) Discussion > Did you find 14 year old Dakota Fanning ...

Did you find 14 year old Dakota Fanning hot in this?

posted 12 years ago by The_Black_Avenger
36 replies | jump to latest

Well the knee-jerk reaction to this would be, of course, "No" but damn it, why did they have to put her in that outfit with the miniskirt and those high black boots that we'd call sexy on anyone over the age of consent in your jurisdiction... showing a lot of leg, doll-like pale skin and a lot of doe-eyed shots.

I think when you put an actress in that kind of outfit you mustbe trying to make her hot.

Gross? Eh, I blame the creators of the film.

[–] Romani_grl 10 years ago

Seek help

[–] cobnut 9 years ago

Well, teenagers don't magically transform physically into adults on whatever the legal birthday is in their country (it's 16 in mine). People who have children of their own seem to lose the ability to recognise that basic fact.
If nobody found underage teens attractive, we wouldn't have consent laws in place would we? The word 'jailbait' wouldn't exist, all those 'barely legal' websites would go out of business, and adult stores wouldn't sell schoolgirl uniforms for grown women to wear in the bedroom.
It's normal to find the occasional precocious adolescent in their late teens attractive. It's just not normal to act upon it. As an adult you have to know better. It's only when you fixate exclusively on teenagers that you should 'seek help'.
So yes, in summary, I did find Dakota attractive in this movie. And no, I would not act upon that attraction. By the way, I'm a woman.

The mirror... it's broken.
Yes, I know. I like it that way. Makes me look the way I feel.

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] rocconorth 8 years ago

Well, teenagers don't magically transform physically into adults on whatever the legal birthday is in their country (it's 16 in mine). People who have children of their own seem to lose the ability to recognise that basic fact.
If nobody found underage teens attractive, we wouldn't have consent laws in place would we? The word 'jailbait' wouldn't exist, all those 'barely legal' websites would go out of business, and adult stores wouldn't sell schoolgirl uniforms for grown women to wear in the bedroom.
It's normal to find the occasional precocious adolescent in their late teens attractive. It's just not normal to act upon it. As an adult you have to know better. It's only when you fixate exclusively on teenagers that you should 'seek help'.

couldn't have said it better myself...so I won't. but i will say i have to laugh at these pc idiots who when prompted to comment on the attractiveness of "youngish" girl say, "Um...how old is she...17! No way man!". They have no idea how much of a trained seal they look like and can't seem to square that circle with the fact that if they were from a different country they'd say something completely different. what's more, the most annoying thing is when these supposed "non-judgmental" people in the West comment about what's wrong with other countries who have the age of consent a little lower. like they really think there is some official, magical age that enlightened people have gleaned through "science" or something...and they don't realize the age itself is arbitrary to the norms and traditions of the culture...

In the paper today...tales of war and of waste
But you turn right over to the T.V. page

[–] userrrrr 9 years ago

*beep* no man, she looks and acts like a 10 year old molestation victim.

🐙

[–] neoyamaneko-86579 9 years ago

This was also the age when she started dressing slutty irl as well. I think with that plus with her wanting to do the rape scene in "Hounddog" that she's got some issues when it comes to sexuality.

[–] HalfBloodPrincess1967 9 years ago

Can we quit tossing around words like slut and whore? It's funny how no one ever calls boys that. Double standard!

BTW, I didn't think she was dressed that badly. Miley Cyrus, on the other hand, does have issues.

AVADA KEDAVRA!!!

[–] neoyamaneko-86579 9 years ago

Oh...I use manwhore and dog all the time.

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] rocconorth 8 years ago

Can we quit tossing around words like slut and whore? It's funny how no one ever calls boys that. Double standard!

Um...and I submit you already know this but felt compelled to trumpet today's new-speak...the double standard exists because "standards" are different for a reason. Having sex is a biological urge so it doesn't conform so much to fads of the time. The fact is, evolutionarily speaking, the more sex a guy has with the more women the better chance he'll contribute "himself" to the future. For a girl that's not the case. In fact, it's the opposite. Once a girl becomes pregant...she's precluded for about year from conceiving again. So basically, a girl *beep* a bunch of different guys makes no sense because now she won't know which guy was the father and she loses the option of passing on her genes with the male of her choice. If she gets knocked up by a loser she loses her chance to pass on her genes with a winner. On the other hand, a guy...instinctually speaking...has no such worries. If he impregnates a "bad choice" he just moves on to the next. In fact, the more the merrier spread it everywhere! Isn't 100 women carrying forth his DNA better than 10 for "his future"? Hence, it makes sense for men to instictually attempt to have sex with as many women as possible and no sense the other way around and no amount of political correctness will change that or why people sensibly view women who act like men as "sluts". They're acting in a way that's completely un-natural and against their very own self interest and thus...to be viewed askance.

In the paper today...tales of war and of waste
But you turn right over to the T.V. page

[–] Traveller411 8 years ago

Gotta love the caveman defense for modern boorish behavior.

[–] Strazdas (2472) 6 years ago

Hot as in sexy? No. Hot as in cute kid? Sure.

[–] legnadibrom (6520) 6 years ago

hot seems to have as many uses across a spectrum as fuck

[–] Wuchak (8857) 6 years ago

She has a cute face and nice hair, but she's so thin in this movie she's not sexually inspiring to adults whatsoever. In other words, she's just a kid; and so the thought of sex/romance is completely off the table, unless maybe the dude's 13-14.

[–] Taeivon (197) 4 years ago

90% of grown straight males will find her attractive, but only a few will have the balls to admit it. There's literally nothing wrong with it. You can look, but not touch.