Far too underrated


This film is beautiful and for it to receive a Razzie is a slap in the face to the fantasy genre. I don't remember when this was released, but from what I hear it was touted as a horror film, which I don't get.

This reminds me of that much hated film: Ishtar - Considered a terrible embarrassment to American cinema,but when I first watched it in my early teens, I was on the floor laughing and it remains to date one of my favorite films. I just don't think people got the point of Ishtar, and I don't think people get the point of Lady in the Water.

reply

agree - it was a good film

reply

most people are pieces of crap anyway, i don't care what they think.

reply

[deleted]

I feel the exact same way! People don't GET this film at all. In addition, I would like to add that people don't get Shyamalan's films as well.

reply

I feel the exact same way! People don't GET this film at all. In addition, I would like to add that people don't get Shyamalan's films as well.

---

I really love this one but do not as yet fully "get it".

obviously we have the Atlantis message but the Dylan, ML King aspect is not 100% clear but all the "I have a dream" clues are sitting there

http://www.kindleflippages.com/ablog/

reply

I enjoyed it as I have enjoyed all of Night's films (with the exception of 'After Earth', but I attribute the lesser quality of that film to too much Will Smith influence).

So many folks absolutely adored 'The Sixth Sense'.

I liked it very much, but as a longtime fan of the horror/supernatural/fantasy genre, I think that Sixth Sense was heralded by so many so much more than his later films because it was mainstream accessible. Night found with that film just the right balance of a good story well-played AND accessibility.

Plus he was able to appeal to folks who weren't such diehard fans of the genre (e.g., Granny down the street who would rarely watch other films of that genre absolutely fell in love with Sixth Sense); many folks were SO taken with some plot devices in that film, but that were already fairly well-known to fans of the genre, and is one of the reasons there ARE fans of that genre. In other words, some folks 'broke cherry' on that film, so there was a novel appeal. If some newbies really liked it primarily because of the 'novelty', then he could only be bound to fail in their eyes with later works because novelty by definition cannot be repeated.

So, these same folks pan later films & some criticize Night mercilessly and I feel unjustly so. He can't make another 'Sixth Sense' (there is only one and rightly so) anymore than someone can again have a 'first' experience.

His other films have interesting stories, unique plots, moving musical scores, wonderful cinematography, and I love the ways the stories arc and crescendo to the end.

I just hope he keeps making films.

And, I personally don't mind his films being appreciated by fewer folks who GET them (and this is not my being pretentious here), so long as he remains able and willing to continue to make films.

Many of my favorite bands and films are not always widely appreciated by the masses.

I really am not trying to unfairly *diss* the mainstream here, but one look at what passes as 'popular' entertainment in both TV and film, even despite humongous budgets, leaves a lot to be desired.

Night remains one of my favorite directors and modern day storytellers.





~~ The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what fiction means ~ ~ Oscar Wilde

reply

I rate it 10/10 and I own it on DVD. I also own the beautiful score on CD and used part of it in a music video I made, recently.

Volker Flenske: (While torturing David) I don't know why you're doing this to yourself!

reply

I totally agree with you. I thought it was brilliant and awfully misunderstood. It's one of my all time favourite movies and I just don't get why they marketed it as a horror movie, because it is a far cry from a horror movie.

reply

[deleted]