This ISN'T that bad of a movie...

[deleted]

This movie is bad. With a major B. But it isn't close to being one of the hundred, or even thousand worse movies ever made. Saying that is about as intelligent as saying that Paris Hilton is a genious.

Yes, it is that bad. In fact, it's worse. It's not enjoyably bad like The Room; it's just terrible.

Not a great movie by any stretch but a lot better than I was expecting. Especially since i just watched National Lampoon's Pledge This. (BTW Pledge This is so bad its good. It's like when you have a toothache and you press down on the tooth and it hurts, but in a good way.)

Paris looks WAY better as a brunette and even though there were some rough spots (particularly the first real serious scene with her and Jason Mewes--her infliction is completely wrong) she made the character likable, which was what she was supposed to do.

The story was a little bit different, which was cool. There wasn't a ton of humor, just a few chuckles here and there. It's refreshing in that it's not a sappy movie where the guy turns into a little girl and pours his heart out. Thank you Jason Mewes.

I'm not necessarily going to recommend it, but if you have Netflix and you wanted to watch it instantly and stream it, there are worse movies.

I didn't want to reply to any thread on this film, lest someone know i was here, and that i had GASP actually seen this "movie" while it was on HBO and i was... in a coma or paralysed, or shackled to a chair or something... god, i just cannot for the life of me remember why i watched this... maybe hoping Jason Mewes really was funny and could stand on his own two feet (He isn't and he can't).

That being said, shelley0603's three year old post drew me in like the Sirens Song, and i just had to open my big, fat, know-it-all-smart-ass mouth (fingers?) and say (type?) that, "How can you be proud of someone that you don't even know?" and to say that you're proud of her talents (beyond giving a mediocre blowjob with night-vision goggles on, she has not one discernible talent that i, or most, can see). Miss Hilton is a vapid, self-absorbed, flat piece of wet cardboard (and not just when preening for the camera) and she has spawned this bizarre, sick obsession with the same, that much of America seemingly cannot get enough of (aaaah, I just ended a sentence with a preposition!). America's appetite for, and applause of, mediocrity and banalities and boorishness (and celebrity in general) is just beyond my understanding, it really is.

You're proud of her because she tried her best... at what? She's rich and awful and a sign of the times and i really wish she would just go all Howard Hughes and lock herself away in one of her castles, and collect her urine in jars and drink the blood of infants or do whatever it is that the stupidly mega-wealthy do when they go nuts. And now that being said, i continue to ask questions (that will likely go forever unanswered by you), "How can you feel sorry for someone you don't know? How can you be proud of (that is to feel pride for) someone you don't know; someone who you will never know, and who would very likely look at you with disdain and openly mock you for wearing last season's clothes or for knowing how to read?" I'm serious when i ask this (to no one in particular, though i wish to have caught up with you in time to ask these questions of you); she tried? She gave it her best shot? And please, i'm not one of those people who jumps on others for saying of their favourite sports team, "We won!" or "We're gonna kick the Bengals ass next week." That i understand, that's just simplifying speech and associating your(hypothetical)self with the team you support. But to feel empathy and pride for someone you don't know and who very likely wouldn't be proud of you (or likely even aware of you) if you won the Nobel Prize in Physics for unifying Quantum and Newtonian Physics...

And for you to express this emotion towards her automatically makes you a better person than she; I wouldn't give Paris the time of day, anymore than she would me.

And you may say tu quoque, as i speak as though i have some intimate knowledge of her (which would also give me herpes) or have had some personal experiences with her. Of course I speak only of her carefully crafted(?) public persona; if that is the way she chooses to portray herself, if that is the way she wants people to perceive her, how she wants people (id est the public at large) to think of her... well, it may be a great and fallacious logical leap (i doubt it), but i say that i am more likely than not correct about her as being vapid and grotesque and a whore of many sorts (and I am by certainly no means a prude).


something terribly clever.