Vote- Hit or Miss
Vote if this is worth seeing or not.
shareI vote yes - brilliant horror movie.
shareDefinitely worth seeing
shareHit
share
Great movie but could have been explained better so i would say definetly see it.
Congratulations, you're all wrong and under the age of 17.
Couldn't have missed more. It's a shame to consider what it costs to make a film nowadays and how this money could have been better spent.
under the age of 17? go to hell you jackass i saw this movie and i didnt like it ok. and how dare you say the money could have been better spent its a filmmakers choice on how the money should be spent it probably gave alot of crew members jobs.
Could have been better, but nevertheless worth checking out.
"We shouldn't be here." -- Erica Leerhsen, Wrong Turn 2
share
Hit.
shareHmm, I thought it was a big fat miss.
It had a lot of elements that I don't ever really gelled or added up to much.
Serious miss. Spent a long time with practically no action and then tried to give you the entire back story in 30 seconds flat. Not a great load of dialogue either.
I'd rather be happy than right, any day - Slartibartfast
MISS!
"Frankenstein was creator,not the monster.A common misconception held by all truly stupid people"
A big fat juicy hit. Didn't think much at first but it stuck in the brain, so I watched it again. And again. And then again. Have now seen it about 20 to 25 times, I dunno I've lost count. Not sarcastic either, I have really seen it that many times, though some of it was just to try to work out how the rooms in the house fitted together.
shareI vote for hit.
It was amazing.
Also, how many horror films take place around the Civil War era?
It was at least 2X better than like... Land of the Dead or the remake of Dawn of the Dead with friggin running zombies.
MISS
Worth seeing if you have a bit of time to kill. Otherwise, the film was undone by a nonsensical and uninteresting script, the only merit of which is that this particular horror tale takes place during the Civil War. Some excellent actors were assembled and then completely wasted, though they do what they can with the little that the story has to offer. The direction is very pedestrian, exhibiting next to no skill or imagination. Most of the shocks are completely predictable and derivative. Apart from a few of the actors (who, as I said, are pretty much wasted) the only other merits that this forgettable film has is some sharply defined and menacing photography, some well chosen locations, and a music score that is at times extremely disquieting, at others in keeping with the lame shock-effects that plague the latter half of the film. The sound is fairly impressive, though the demonic voices and mysterious whispers schtick is both overdone and overfamiliar. The "creature" was reasonably well done, by a nonsensical and overdone plot device that is decidely not scarey.
1 and a half stars.
you said it was great, yet you say you didnt like it. what the hell?
it was a miss. i really dont know what to say. boring. no scares. bad ending. i cant even remember the story. i cant help but ask why people think this is a good film. i mean, it looked cool from the back cover, but it ended up not having much to it.
[deleted]
How about you give your opinion WITHOUT insulting people. That would be awesome.
And nobody here is right OR wrong: It's all OPINION! Your OPINION is NOT fact, Jackass
i think this is just a "meh"
i watched tons of horror movies (features, indie, ecc) im still into the idea this is just meh
i enjoyed "the burrowers" way more, i highly suggest it, it's a western-horror like this