Which is worse: "Crystal Skull", or "Temple of Doom"?


I know "Crystal Skull" gets more hate, but I think "Temple of Doom" is far worse. "Crystal Skull" is disappointing and meh, but "Temple of Doom" is absolutely unwatchable, and I hate Kate Capshaw in it far more than I hate Mutt.

Your vote?

reply

You're a dumbass and have no taste if you think TOD is a bad movie. Who drummed that into your head? Maybe you're just jealous when you see Kate Capshaw because you weren't picked to be Mrs. Steven Spielberg.

reply

Stick to Transformers for your taste sucks.

reply

I enjoy Temple of Doom as much as, if not more than, Last Crusade, to be honest. But Raiders beats them both by a country mile.

Crystal what? Is that even a movie?

reply

THEY ARE BOTH GOOD...I THINK CRYSTAL SKULL IS THE BETTER OF THE TWO THOUGH.

reply

"Crystal Skull" is by far the worst "Temple of Doom" was typical for it's time, but "Crystal Skull" for a 2008 film was shameful. Bad script/plot, bad casting choices "let's bring one of our spoiled jewish friends to be the next gen Indy Jr, Yep ! who else Shia LaBeouf !" we know how that went ROFL.

Spielberg degrading himself and doing stupid green screen CGI scenes throughout the film.

reply

Sorry Otter but this isn't even a question. You're entltitled to your preference but Crystal Skull isn't in the same stratosphere of Temple of Doom which is bold classic & frankly my personal favorite Indy film out of all of them.

reply

Crystal Skull is worse.

reply

Oh, "Crystal Skull" is BEYOND foul! Absolutely horrible. The action finale of "Temple of Doom" is very good, even though the rest of the movie is bad. Plus, TOD has an absolutely GREAT John Williams score. Even Williams is beyond bored on "Crystal Skull."

reply