This one is definitely better than the first one. More individuals involved in this movie and more action.
shareI completely agree. Very rare for horror franchises to have a superior sequel.
Live Full & Die Empty. Tap Your Potential and Realize Your Dreams!
[deleted]
All of you are on crack. This movie is awful on every level. At least the first tries to make sense where this one just threw a bunch of crap together. If they wanted a psychic they should of brought back the black chick from the first. They could of made it where she somehow survived. More action does not mean better movie.
shareShe did survive. The Creeper left her alone and went after Darry and Trish.
shareIt's been a while since I've seen the first. With that, why the hell didn't they bring her back then instead of giving us this lame version of a high school girl that is never explained why she has a psychic connection. Sure she's hot, but come on. It's not like it balanced out all the scenes of dudes without shirts... lol While I don't need everything explained to me (like most Americans... lol) sometimes it becomes sort of pivotal to the story and this would be one of those times.
shareEasy.. out of all the kids on the bus she was the most clairvoyant and was probably most sensitive to the supernatural world.. while most people aren't there are a few who are. So with that Darry decided to show himself to her in order to warn the kids. It was never supposed to be explained, its just one of those things where it just is.
If I remember correctly the woman in the first movie also didn't have an explanation as to why she would be getting premonition dreams of who the next victim of the creeper would be she just did. Also her ability was different from Minxies.. while she had predictions and premonitions Minxie was being talked to by the dead not having a premonition so Darry was pursuing her.
"I swear, teenager girls who fall for vampires are like cows falling for butchers."
If I remember correctly the clairvoyant in the first film made her living that way. And when it comes to the second there is still no need for a clairvoyant. Other than the quick couple of images and the only reason for her to be that way is to have knowledge of the Creeper so she could explain to those audience that hadn't seen the first. All of which could of explained better through a better plot. It should been more about the farmer in search of his boy than about a bus full of teenagers.
shareI agree. This is one of the worst horror movies I've ever seen.
shareYou say that as if the psychic from the first film was explained
Death Awaits (Horror forum)
http://w11.zetaboards.com/Death_Awaits/index/
Yes while i liked the first one too this one ups the ante a lot more and is better.
Lose the Game!!!!!!!
the first one was way better imo. much creepier
shareI agree. Part 2 is much better!
sharethe first one was more old stylel horror , parts reminded me of duel a bit, and people dont like that,
the second is more moderny horror and was liked bymore people, it doesnt make the 2nd one better, it makes it diffrent, i liked the first one more then the second, the second felt more formulatic to me where the first poked at those formula's "you know that moment in a horror movie when some one does something so stupid they hate him for the rest of the movie, this is it" that was a clear jab at that cliche, where the second was more full of cliche's like that and the second one turned mor einto a monster flick then the first one,the movie was stellar upto the uncovering of the creeper. up to that point it was a good road movie kind of horror .
The second has so much sterio types and stupid decicions......
what doesn't kill you hasn't been done properly.
[deleted]