MovieChat Forums > Queer as Folk (2000) Discussion > Sex scenes... graphic or no?

Sex scenes... graphic or no?


I'm a gay man so don't attack me with the "IF IT WERE A STRAIGHT COUPLE U WOULDN'T BE POSTING THIS"; however, I've heard people tell me that the sex scenes in this show are tame, and even more tame in comparison to the British version, and it confuses the hell out of me. People have posted similar sentiments on the internet. I've watched a couple episodes of the British series and the sex scenes come across as much less graphic. When I was a teenager (pre-coming out and all of that), I used to watch episodes of the US version on Showtime sometimes when everyone was in bed, and, maybe it was just my raging hormones, but I remember being mildly shocked by how much was shown. Sans genitalia, I specifically remember a scene where two guys were having sex in a kitchen; one was lying on the countertop getting 'done' by the other guy who was standing up, and there was a full-on pull-out and you saw semen splattering all over the bottom guy's stomach. Now, I'm not prude at all (in all reality, I of all people would find enjoyment in watching this), but I don't GET how people say the sex in this show was so 'light'. I know we all have different definitions of what is graphic and what is not, but this show was edgy. All storylines aside, the sex in it ranks as softcore porn with an edge as far as I'm concerned. Am I wrong about this?

reply

Thought Emmett and Drew's first sexual encounter was pretty graphic.

reply

A thread with a title like this deserves a move up top.

reply

move up top


Slight pun intended?!

The most graphic sex scenes for me were always the ones in the back room at Babylon. Of course, they were usually random, non-speaking extras (except for Todd, of course, "Hey, Todd, how's it going", "Fine"!). There was every concievable type of graphic sex going on back there. Imagine how it looked after closing time, when the lights came back up? I'd hate to be the cleaning person at Babylon!

reply

The sex scenes never seemed terribly graphic to me, but that's because they didn't SHOW anything [other than bare butts]. But I wouldn't expect to see actual penises, so I wasn't disappointed.

However, I always took exception to the anal sex with NO FOREPLAY, no lube, nothing, just, bam!, inserted just like that. Not very realistic.


--

http://www.CaliforniaDreamsPhotography.com

reply

The sex scenes for me lasted too long and were unrealistic in where/how often they happened. I mean, some lasted for like 3 minutes. I don't need to see the full act, i get it. I don't know about anybody else, but i don't care to watch that prolonged of a sex scene unless i am trying to get off or something

reply

bump

reply

The U.K. edition was basically as sexual explicit as UK shows were at the time except it was gay sex.

The U.S. version was similarly explicit based on what cable shows were doing at the time.

Some scenes of fellatio were changed to anal sex scenes in the U.S. edition. FAR fewer of the principal characters s smoke in the U.S. edition. Stuff like that is pretty common.

Overall the U.S. edition is more sexually explicit then the UK edition, but sometimes leaving some thing to the imagination can be more romantic.

The U.K. edition didnt last as long as the U.S. edition - something not uncommon with British shows -

reply

bump

reply

Bump

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I think it was graphic for the time it was in. Early 2000s were a time when we had to push the envelope to show us in our entirety, including sex, drugs, likes, dislikes, backgrounds that were different from being hairdressers and fashion coordinators.

reply

It's still graphic for today, as gay sex scenes in other shows are still regularly watered down compared to hetero ones.

reply

^^ Agreed!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Bump

reply