How could anything be think it was real?
I actually haven’t even watched this film but apparently people thought it was real? But it was released in a movie theater and was marketed as a movie not a documentary right? Makes zero sense
shareI actually haven’t even watched this film but apparently people thought it was real? But it was released in a movie theater and was marketed as a movie not a documentary right? Makes zero sense
shareYou would be surprised how easily people can be convinced that something, however far fetched it sounds, is true.
shareIt was marketed as found footage, and it was basically the first of it's kind. If it came out now you could say it's like Paranormal activity, and you would immediately know what you were getting into. 1999, people never saw anything like this. So there was the thought that it was actually found and edited into a documentary.
The internet was still in it's infancy, so it wasn't as easy as it is now to go online and fact check.
It was a time of innocence, forever lost.
shareIt certainly looked authentic.
It's like Santa Claus, even if people know it's not true, they still like to believe it is. That's how this film became huge.
I saw TBWP in the cinema when it first came out. I never for a moment thought it was real. The marketing hype was great though (I actually preferred the 'documentary' The Curse of the Blair Witch, which detailed the 'legend' and the 'finding' and 'examination' of the footage).
shareIt was largely due to the marketing, add that found footage films mostly unheard of (virtually non-existent). The premise being that footage was found, therefore capturing reality, then edited by people such that it can be presented to an audience.
It wasn't just that this film in and of itself took off, it was the timing of its release and everything associated with it that captured lightening in a bottle.
I've heard that leaflets were handed out with photos of three missing college kids (the actors from the film), then add to that internet buzz (as the internet was still in its infancy), word of mouth takes off and there you have it. It truly was one of those "you had to be there" moments to understand.
So someone such as yourself comes along much later and asks a reasonable question after viewing the film and wouldn't have a context for this kind of thing. Which is very understandable. But that's the basic gist of it. I'm sure there are very good breakdowns online about why and how this film -- if not fooled people outright -- at least made them curious enough to see the film.
Contrary to what people would lead you to believe, people have always been dumb and gullible.
A bunch of teens back in 1999 got hoodwinked by a marketing gimmick and haven't stopped bleating on about how special the movie is because of it. "You had to be there man, you had to be there" roughly translates to I was a shithead and fell for it circa 1999, so did my shithead friends. You had to be a shithead circa 1999 to fully experience the movie.
The "had to be there" reference was referring to the time and place and the elements that drew people to the film. Walking away believing the film was real is an entirely different matter. I know your comment was to the OP, just wanted to clarify what I meant by "had to be there" as you posted immediately after I did.
I saw the film when it was first released, a midnight showing no less. I hadn't been exposed to any marketing save for a couple of advertisements on an alternative station. So I was curious. The night was fun. The crowd electric. The dark theater surrounding one with the sound of breaking limbs made you feel like you were in the woods yourself. Which only added to the fun.
It was an absorbing experience (which one hopes for in any film one takes the time to watch) and as I said, it was fun. I thought it silly that anyone would take this film as reality. Nor do I remember talking to anyone that did. Though I'm sure some must have.
There are always a few.
I didn't even read your post so my "you had to be there" reference wasn't a jest at you. It's just one of the main talking points about this movie. Everyone who loves it and saw it back in 1999 always states "you had to be there".
I think if you had to at a specific moment in time to enjoy a movie then it's not all that.
incorrect
it was marketed as if it was real