Which is worse? Episode I or II?

I would have to agree with you joshua_maddock. Episode II was worse in my opinion. It just seemed like it was made with not a lot of effort. Yeah, it's amazing how long we've come with CGI, but it just felt empty. It was void of emotion and the acting...[shuddering at the scenes with Anakin and Padme on Naboo]...was just dull, with the exception of Anakin's murdering rampage after his mother died. But even that was too short a scene and it was the music made the difference, particularly when you see him looking at her corpse and then slowly looking up.

While nothing in this is as good as Maul or the podrace, and the effects have aged worse, somehow I like this one more. The main thing is that it is paced better and never as painfully boring. The plot is halfway interesting and unique for Star Wars, and it's cool to see Obi-Wan play detective. It's also more mature with an absence of fart jokes and Jar Jar (mostly).

FYC: Keanu Reeves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvaCWTkSXdE

Somehow through the years I've development a morbid affection for The Phantom Menace, as bad as it is I still pop it up and watch it once in a while.

I've never done that with AOTC.



What's best in life ?

Moron


The stupid have one thing in common.They alter the facts to fit their views not the other way

WELL, let's see...Calling to mind the most TERRIBLE moments of each...

Episode I has crap like that part where the race announcer starts popping and locking.

And Episode II has "Hello, Dex 😀" UUUUUUUUGH.

I don't know; tough call.

[deleted]

AOTC was worse for the simple reason that TPM had at least one great actor called Liam Neeson. AOTC could have been superior if Lucas would had casted a proper actor instead of Hayden C. and didn't use green screens for every *beep* shot.

II is the worst of them all. Just look at this:

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/01861/Yodaembed_1861053a.jpg

https://timenerdworld.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/hoverscooter.jpg?w=475&h=198

This example of horrible CGI is in a 115 million dollar movie.

I've seen fanfilms with better CGI. The whole movie has this weird digital late 90's look. Even the real actors look digital. WHY WHY WHY?

Note to digital filmmakers: CGI ages badly. Today's cutting edge digital effects are laughable within 10 years. Just look at King Kong.

And then there is the story ...



I'm just on my way up to Clavius.