Which is worse? Episode I or II?


Episode II in my opinion. It's just so creepy!!

reply

Creepy? You mean by Anakin's weird obsession with padme? Yeah that's weird.

reply

Episode II gets MAJOR points taken away for that Fonzarelli diner scene. George Lucas was on crack for that idea. The assembly line droid factory scene is no picnic, either. However, the arena battle at the end was very cool.

Episode I suffers from the Jar Jar character (more crack smoked by Lucas) and a convoluted, boring plot with shockingly bland characters, but has the very cool Darth Maul character.

It is just so hard to decide which movie is worse. BUT-- gun to my head, I'd have to say Episode I was worse.

Sith, however, is worse than them all.

reply

Clones was worse for the following reasons

1)Hayden Christiansen

2)stupid love story scenes

3)too much green screens

reply

Episode I was terrible, but at least it was memorable in its crappiness. Sure, thats mainly due to being the first Star Wars film in 16 years, but there's no question that Darth Maul, the podraces, and friggin Jar Jar are more remembered than anything that came from Episode II, which was bad AND forgettable.

reply

Episode I is terrible. Episode II is dreadful. And Episode III is terrible and dreadful. Actually, all three movies are disasters.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

reply

episode 1 for sure.

reply

Episode VI, the whole movie is completely unfocused.

reply

Ep 7

reply