I know this movie isn't that rational, but anyway the duel with Jelly Roll got me a little pissed.
1900 wins by practically just hitting the keys fast enough so he can light his cigarette with a heated up wire. If I remember right it was the same piece Jelly Roll played before him, and it wasn't really a song at all. The second song by Jelly Roll was definetely superior than any by 1900, so Jelly Roll should have clearly won the duel because 1900 couldn't beat his performance.
What the hell was the thing with the heated wire anyway, who knows if Jelly Roll could've done the same. I thought it was about who's better at playing piano, in which case Jelly Roll won it hands down.
I sort of agree, BUT.. it became obvoius to me b4 the comp ended that it seemed to be about who could play faster, and tim showed an amazing control to play that peice. i also belive if jelly could of played the same peice he would of. And if the crowd was any indication then 1900 won HANDS DOWN!
First off, there is a sense of humor that 1900 has that obviously you did not catch. He played with the emotions of people and Jelly Roll. He copied the piece that Jelly Roll had played PERFECTLY. Now, I doubt your a pianist, because if you were, then you'd know that that's easier said than done. I know there are master pianists out there who can do stuff like that, but to just instantly copy and play a song you JUST heard... is crazy. And his intention was to piss Jelly Roll off. He did.
He played that really slow song, I think it was a Christmas song? Anyway, it was SO simple and here was his point: He knew that when he'd get done playing that everyone who applaud for him REGARDLESS of what he'd play. He was pointing out that Jelly Roll was the stranger on the boat. He made it feel like Jelly Roll had to earn his right to be applauded. 1900 knew he could play something so simple, something that a six-year-old could play, and he'd still get applause. This ticked off Jelly Rolly, which was is point, mind you.
Now, the part where he played insanely fast. Here's the point of all that. That was humanly impossible to play with just two hands. That's something that can be done by two people. The point is NOT how fast he was playing. It was that he was playing the impossible with such great intensity. There is no one who could play that. The fact that it lit a cigarette was for show. Most people wouldn't catch that what he was playing was impossible, but they would understand that playing a piano fast enough to light a cigarette is pretty dang impressive.
I've pee on myself.
Hope this helps. I'm not trying to come across too critical.
I am a pianist, and let me just outline the structure of the duel:
1. Morton plays a classic Rag which he really wrote himself.
2. 1900 responds by playing his personal beautiful arrangement of "Silent Night". This is at a point where he is not interested in even taking part in the duel, not because he thinks he may lose but, rather, I believe, because of Jelly Roll's supercilious attitude and demeaning treatment of 1900.
3. Morton plays another one of his Rags, one which is somewhat more difficult technically than his first.
4. 1900 responds by re-playing EXACTLY what Jelly Roll played. This is, for any musician, a very dificult thing to do. We are assuming that 1900 has never heard this piece before (I believe the director had that in mind).
5. Morton takes his last shot with another of his great Stride piano pieces.
6. NOW--the great thing about 1900's final performance is NOT that he is playing so fast (and, if you listen to the performance, as opposed to watching the visual montage, you will hear that this can indeed be played by one person), but rather that this is entirely an Improvisation--i.e. composed on the spot. He out-played Morton at Morton's own great ability. And of course, as someone noted, no one could ever make the steel strings on a piano heat that much as to enable someone to light a cigarette. That is just poetic license (I have broken a couple of strings in my day, but that is something completely different). It is, clearly, after Morton's 3rd performance that 1900 decides he will win the duel.
Sorry if I sound technical, but this is a very technical scene, and someone asked about the structure and interpretation of what occurs. Thanks.
Allen Roth The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.--Burke
Would any of you happen to know what the second song Morton played is called? I'm dying to know what the name of that rag is! Please let me know your thoughts. thanks,
Just a little note about your second point, if you watch again, when 1900 starts to play silent night the cam cuts to mortons face, and it almost looks like hes about to cry, i was thinking that as a pianist he hears how perfect his performance/rendition of that so simple yet beautiful song was, everyblody else thinks it just an xmass tune. yet morton realises how well he does it. but in any case i agreee with you. GREAT FFFING MOVIE
Just my opinion, but I believe that 1900 played "Silent Night" because he really liked Jelly Roll's playing, and didn't feel that he needed to participate in a full on duel. He didn't need the attention like Jelly did. And Jelly's reaction seemed angry, like he felt 1900 was mocking him by not participating. When 1900 recreated Jelly's first piece perfectly, again, I think it was a tribute, but Jelly just felt mocked (like "I can re-create what you do no problem"). So at the third go around, Jelly threw the angry slur at 1900. Only then did 1900 pick up the challenge. Thanks
Those who've never seriously played an instrument apparently don't understand the difficulty involved even in sight-reading a piece they've never seen or heard, let alone listening to it and playing it back. On a one-note instrument like a cornet or flute it would be phenomenal; on a multi-note instrument such as piano, organ, harp or violin -- mind-boggling. Impossible might be a closer term.
I used to play classical and rock (just for a living), as well as pipe organ, and was blown away by the music and the spectacular job of "faking" the hand and finger movements. Mostly it's just shot around in movies, and I suspect most pianists, like me, have a deep appreciation for those like Roth, Amy Irving, or Richard Dreyfuss who obviously spent uncountable hours making it look right. I honestly had to watch "The Competition" several times to be certain that those two weren't doing the work. A few older films, like the violin work in "Intermezzo," display the same craftsmanlike devotion to making the hand movements look perfect.
One thing I do wonder .... who was actually doing the playing for Clarence Williams and Tim Roth? Probably unknown to any but a few professionals, but it'd be nice to see them get the credit.
I can't remember if we ever get a good look at the maker's name on the piano. That (walnut?) burl finish is spectacular. If we get a look at all, it must be a lesser name. I'd have remembered Bösendorfer or Bechstein.
Do you play the piano? I ask because I don't really think that sight-reading on the piano is any more difficult than on another instrument. The fact that we play more than one note at a time is compensated for by the familiarity with the instrument, the muscular "memory" we develop and, most importantly, because other instruments have other issues, like breathing, intonation, coordination, etc. We don't have to think about using two hands to play one note, like on a stringed instrument, or breathing in a certain way for a note to come out right (like brass and woodwind). I never really felt that it was easier for a violinist or a trombonist to play at sight, but maybe that's cause I was always a good sight reader.
One thing I do wonder .... who was actually doing the playing for Clarence Williams and Tim Roth? Probably unknown to any but a few professionals, but it'd be nice to see them get the credit.
Hey smokehill retrievers, I realize this post is quite late, but I'm pretty sure Clarence Williams did his own playing. It sure does LOOK like he's doing it and it's pretty easy to tell when someone is fake playing (especially if you have been trained in music in any way). Another factor that leads me to believe that he did his own playing is upbringing. It says in his biography that his father was a musician and that he was brought up by his grandparents who were musicians as well (Clarence Williams I and Eva Taylor).
reply share
Sorry - really have to disagree with you on that one.
I am a pianist, and I was impressed how well Tim Roth kept up the illusion, however Clarence Williams totally destroyed the illusion. I'm not going to analyse it, but at certain points he was playing completely the wrong octave!
Why, oh, why do so many people refer to any music as a "song"? It's a "song" only if it is a musical composition with words. The "duel" scene in "The Legend of 1900" is an example. Jelly Roll Morton and 1900 were playing musical pieces on a piano, ... instrumentals. They did not sing, as I recall. Thus they were not "songs".
I'm not entirely sure, but I think in the end credits I saw a 'Mr. Roth's piano teacher' or something. He apparantly got some basic piano lessons and that particular song isn't very hard so it's definitely possible.
That is also what it says on the soundtrack. Doesn´t seem impossible to me but then again I don´t play.
My guess about the cigarette lighting is that it´s a reference to playing a "hot piano" the reason why jelly roll is coming to the boat is that he heard someone play a hotter piano than he did, at least that´s what he tells the reporters before he gets on the boat. So obviously 1900 plays a piano hot enough to light a cigarette and thus wins the duel
I just wanted to say that I agree with alot that has been said in all the comments above but after having watched this film many many times, this is what I belive the motivation is.
We know that 1900 is not really interested in duelling, he has heard of Jelly Roll and respects him as a great musician, 1900 being such a decent and kind fellow doesn't have quite the same reverence for his own talent ( I believe he knows he could beat Jelly role but doesn't want to at the outset).
He plays a silly little christmas song after Jelly Roll's first attempt because he knew that this would in no way show up a man he admired. When he crys at hearing Jelly Roll's music the look on his face is that of pure enjoyment and respect.
When he goes up and repeats exactly Jelly Roll's composition I believe that he meant this to be seen as a gesture of admiration (immitation being the sincerest form of flattery). But Jelly took it as an insult, not knowing 1900's character, it is at this point when he is very cutting and insults 1900 that he decides to wipe the floor with him.
But I do have absolute faith that 1900 only intends to embarass Jelly Roll after the last insult. The fact that Jelly Roll didn't shake his hand at the start did not push 1900 straight away, he let it pass.
The criticism of the "silly little christmas song" is really unjust. IMHO 1900 is showing that he can play with real feel,(unlike Morton) and Silent Night is a superb piece of music and in no way silly.
It's personal preference - would you rather listen to a Van Halen solo or one from David Gilmour? One outsells the other exponentially.
During he first and second piece, 1900 did not know what was he supposed to do! Do you remember when he was at the ship deck looking at Jelly (who was with the press people)?? He asked Max, "What happens in a duel?"
Heavens, he doesn't even know what's a duel! That's why he played Silent Night as his first piece. Then he thought he was supposed to follow what Jelly was playing, that's why in the second piece, he copied what Jelly played (The Crave).. And mind you, he did not copy that piece 100%.. Listen carefully to the left hand.. 1900's version is far more sophisticated.. When Jelly was playing his final piece, did you notice that the camera kept on showing 1900's face, and 1900 had a frown..? Now, he was beginning to understand what's a duel. That's why he finally licked Jelly with his super fast-hand piece!
Thanks! Finally, someone else has noticed that 1900 did not just "copy" The Crave, but actually played it quite better! And indeed, it is particularly noticeable in the left hand. Wonder why everyone until now has always writen that 1900 copied the piece "exactly", including people with piano experience... Are there different versions of the soundtrack out there?
Anyway, the difference sounded quite obvious to me, and I took it as a very important point: while a 100% accurate copy would have been indeed a technical prowess to be respected, by playing Jelly Roll's own piece better than Jelly Roll himself, 1900 adds insult to injury. Imagine the humiliation...
So, to those of you who missed it: watch the duel again and listend carefully to the two interpretations of The Crave. Then you may understand better why Jelly Roll Morton goes from simple arrogance to losing his temper.
I agree. It's strange that no one noticed before that 1900 not only imitated the second piece, but embellished it. As a well read pianist (as was my movie the companion who watched it with me,) it's hard to miss that roll in the bass which gives the piece a much more tango-esque feel. However, I was a little dissapointed by the third song, which, while fast, seemed like a technical exercise, and nothing more. But I guess in duels, people don't really care about musicality or depth (those are subjective, anyways) but about how fast your fingers can move. In which case, anyone who can light a cigarette on a piano would win... It's obvious from the beginning of the movie that 1900 is a pianist that could be greater than any pianist that has ever existed, and thus his status as a legend (reminding us, too, that this is just a movie, and legends are the stuff of which they are made.)
And the last piece of the duel is NOT playable by one pianist, in the beginning it is, but eventually, it bangs out chords in the high part of the piano, while doing the trill, and doing stride in the bottom. I think it can be arranged to be played by one pianist though.
my oppinion: remember when 1900 explained to Max how he plays the moods of the peoples , their feelings , emotions , stories ? I think the last melody that 1900 played was what Jelly Roll was feeling in that moment. maybe.... :)
Yes, spot on. 1900 took Morton's piece and improved on it - and it wasn't just the left hand. The right hand played more fluidly in the fast passages - Morton's were ever so slightly slow/stuttery momentarily. Hell, I couldn't play like that, but this was supposed to be a duel between the world's finest pianists. No doubt I will later read that it was the same piece repeated, and it was all just wishful thinking on my part, induced by my fondness for his movie :0
A big part of this film is 1900s music (yeah...) at just about every instance of his playing, his music was a feeling, or a story of his surroundings, people, setting, ect...
he was angry, so he played an angry sounding peice, he expressed the feeling very well with his playing. turn on this scence, close your eyes, and listen to it, its different.
I think everyone is over thinking this scene. The way I interpret this scene is quite simple. 1900 knew a duel was utterly ridiculous and un-necessary. Jelly obviously wants media attention, but 1900 has no interest in fame. 1900 wants to deflate that ego, so he parodies every song Jelly makes. Jelly plays soft, 1900 shows he can do it better. 1900 plays the second piece nearly identical to Jelly's. By this point Jelly is furious, and busts out his "Fingerbreaker" which is a tough piece to play. In the final insult, 1900 shows that he can indeed play a hot piano. In his final, "flight of the bumble bee" like performance (which is still music BTW), 1900 shows off his finger work much like Jelly did with "Fingerbreaker." Even Jelly acknowledges his impressive finger work(remember he drops his drink while trying to learn the finger technique). I could develop this more if I didn't have to be at work in fifteen minutes.
i think jazz is that spontaneous thing, not necessarily a song. remember that 1900 shows conne that there is a melody about each person in the ballroom, and his talent is transforming that abstract thing into music. plus, playing fast on the piano is about skill. partly, music is about touching one's heart, not just all about playing well.
Why the hell are you calling it a song??!?!? Who said that any of the pieces were meant to be songs? The piece that wins the duel is not "the crave" the one that Jelly Roll Morton played and then 1900. And if Jelly Roll could have done the same..... he would have done it. Duh.
In my opinion, 1900 was keeping it lite, yeah Jelly's goonies come aboard and lay down the duel, and even then 1900 tried to keep the whole competition lite up till the end when he say's to Jelly( and rightfully so ) " You asked for it A$$hole" and then proceeded to kick his ass.