MovieChat Forums > Titanic (1997) Discussion > There may never be a hit like Titanic ev...

There may never be a hit like Titanic ever again


http://www.avclub.com/article/there-may-never-be-hit-titanic-ever-again-259137

Through pure dollars and cents, it would be hard to claim that Titanic is still the biggest movie of all time. It had a good run, certainly: For a dozen years, nothing approached the enormous domestic and international box office of James Cameron’s Oscar-winning epic about the unsinkable ship that sank. But then came Avatar, Cameron’s other overlong, over-budget, state-of-the-art adventure romance, which quickly surpassed the titanic earnings of Titanic in both the United States and the rest of the world. Eight years later, Avatar is still the global champ. Here in the states, the title now belongs to Star Wars: The Force Awakens, with poor Leo and Kate now floating in the icy waters of third place. Even inflation can’t save Titanic’s top spot in the record books: It’s squarely no. 5 when you adjust the grosses, sandwiched between E.T. and The Ten Commandments on the list of all-time hits.

So, no, Titanic isn’t king of the world anymore. Except maybe it is, at least on a more fundamental level. Maybe there’s still a case to be made for the super-sized disaster weepie as the ultimate multiplex sensation—a phenomenon that dominated the public imagination in a way that Avatar or The Force Awakens never could. To understand why Titanic remains special, you have to look past the total sum of money it earned, even relative to changing ticket prices. You have to look to a different kind of box-office record, one that hasn’t been equaled since and maybe never will be. You have to remember that Titanic was the no. 1 movie in America for 15 consecutive weeks.

Just stop and think about that for a second. Fifteen weeks. That’s almost four straight months. Titanic hit theaters in December of 1997, coming in first place at the box office its opening weekend. It then just sat there at the top of the charts until April of the following year. Every week brought a new crop of movies, hopefully released into hundreds or more theaters across the country. And every week, Americans made the joint decision to just see Titanic again instead.

reply

Of course! This movie was that awesome!

reply

Was the romance the main focus of tons of people paying to see this? I know that many people saw it at least twice, maybe even more. If that's the case, then it's very probable that it wouldn't have made as much adjusted for inflation today, even though the movie's fondness has decreased and increased over time. It's really hard for people to decide between the romance or the tension IMO.

reply

Yeah, there was a bigger hit, thank the Lord. It was called Avatar. Was it better than this bubble-gum soap opera? A bit. More important, more people liked it.

reply

Well, adjusted for inflation, Titanic made more than Avatar.

reply

As awsome as avatar was, I don't see how that movie was able to top Titanic.

reply

I have long been sick and tired of how movies are judged by $ made, even if adjusted by inflation.

To me the true and only measure is how George Steinbrenner judged things like this, and I quote, by “fannies in the seats.”

reply

Good, this is the cheesiest piece of shit of all time.

reply

As cheesy as this movie is, I love it. I mean, every second of it! The acting is overall solid. Technically, it's stunning, and it's well over three hours that doesn't seem that long to me. No blockbuster since has made me feel this way.

I'm ready to respond to the hater now.

reply

Agreed Samoanjoe it was a great time at the theater
But the Billy Zane stuff was obnoxious and not needed imo

reply

Well, as I said, the movie was quite cheesy. But I still love it!

reply

Haha fair enough!
Me too

reply

"But the Billy Zane stuff was obnoxious and not needed imo"

Come on! You need the villain! It helps to sort out the good guys!

I love this movie! Cheese and ALL!
Come to think of it...... I love cheese. I suddenly want to grill a sandwich!

reply

Ooohhh make me one pls im famished lol
I honestly thought the iceberg was the only villain needed

reply

One grilled cheese sandwich coming up!

Nah..... The ship shouldn't have hit the iceberg. We know that from history.
I still think that every love story needs a villain. Billy Zane filled the bill nicely.

reply

Fair enough Miss !
And ill do the plates after:)

reply

DEAL!
[Smiley Face]

reply

No hate from me. I like it as well, for the same reasons, and because I thought it did a great job of capturing the time period, and giving me a good idea of what it must have been like for those poor souls who sailed on it.

reply

" I thought it did a great job of capturing the time period, and giving me a good idea of what it must have been like for those poor souls who sailed on it."

I agree. I was always interested in the story of the Titanic long before this movie was ever made and there were a few movies about it before this one. The thing is, those movies never captured the reality and tragic horror of it all in the way that this movie did. It moved me.

reply

I loved A Night to Remember. It was wonderful. But, Titanic went into such detail with what it was like traveling 3rd class all the way up to 1st class, and what it was like for the people when the water started entering the ship and flooding it. The special effects were remarkable. The scenes when the front of the boat broke and then started pulling the rear down with it, GAH! So realistic.

reply

One thing the OP overlooks is that a majority of the ticket sales were likely from women. Can any other film in the top five claim that?

I thought it was a good film, but that "oops" moment killed it for me.

reply