MovieChat Forums > Three Kings (1999) Discussion > No bad guys = No tension

No bad guys = No tension

posted 10 years ago by chet19
14 replies | jump to latest

Sorry, but I didn't find much drama or conflict in this. Yes, I know the guys holding Marky Mark were supposed to be the bad guys, but then he went into his story about his own son dying, and it kind of made his anti-American point of view seem sincere.
Otherwise, you have Clooney's commander as the bad guy for (how dare he!!) expecting Clooney to follow orders. Not to mention Clooney giving up billions of dollars in order to save a few local villagers. Stupid !
The film needed a really really evil Iraqi to give it some tension.

[–] F_Serpico 10 years ago

Or maybe they just wanted to show that we're all humans.
This was a post-war (sort of) movie, so they had no reason to fight each other.

Why am I Mr. Pink?

[–] nite_eternal 10 years ago

Yeah I don't think you actually got the idea of the movie.

[–] mikeyg24 9 years ago

Yes, I know the guys holding Marky Mark were supposed to be the bad guys, but then he went into his story about his own son dying, and it kind of made his anti-American point of view seem sincere.

You obviously missed the part where he's shown in a compound dedicated to the storing of pilfered goods from Kuwait and the torture of innocent Iraqi's whose only crime was to speak out against Saddam? Yes his rage is a truly understandable one!!! Sympathy for his wife and son yes. Him? Not a chance! I'd have blown his head off.

I've had a lot of sobering thoughts in my time Del Boy, it's them that started me drinking!

[–] Pregnat_asian_woman 9 years ago

There are no heroes in war, only victims.

[–] mikeyg24 9 years ago

Thank you for that gloriously pilfered piece of nonsense.

I've had a lot of sobering thoughts in my time Del Boy, it's them that started me drinking!

[–] Pregnat_asian_woman 9 years ago

And thank you for your eloquently worded piece of nonsense.

[–] tyrexden 9 years ago

The bad guys in the film was American policy... period, point. blank.

[–] Druff (1796) a year ago

Bingo

[–] JellyFish19 9 years ago

This movie had tons of conflict and that is where the tension is build.

[–] r_buro 9 years ago

No bad guys? What do you call the people torturing mark walberg? And like someone else said... you didn't get the film

[–] chilone 9 years ago

Not to mention Clooney giving up billions of dollars in order to save a few local villagers.

Wow!! First, it wasn't billions and I'd surrender it gladly to save all those people from almost certain death. What if you were one of those "local villagers"? Your life wouldn't be worth saving? And no, I'm not an anti-Bush liberal.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

[–] ivaladez87 8 years ago

Sorry, but save the cat isn't the only way to make a movie. Think outside the box, hipster.