Tombstone, easily.
There is a rather humorous basis of argument that persists on this board, about Wyatt Earp being the better, more accurate film about the Earps. This faulty argument makes its home around nothing more than the extended run time of Wyatt Earp vs. Tombstone. Also, how Tombstone is more fun to watch is somehow proof that it is based in fiction vs. the boring, but 'accurate' Wyatt Earp.
The truth is, Tombstone is a nicely accurate portrayal of events surrounding the Earps and the Clantons, Mclowry. Kurt Russell and company for sure nailed the looks of the characters, vs. the laughable pathetic non-attempt by the Costner crew. The facts are that Wyatt Earp doesn't get much right at all in costuming, or set design. It merely lives on in some people's heads as the superior version because 'it's longer', as if that gives it some gravitas as a film. No, its just crap.
reply
share