MovieChat Forums > The Shawshank Redemption (1994) Discussion > I would have shrugged off Tommy...

I would have shrugged off Tommy...


So when Tommy tells Andy about Elmo Blatch...u gotta remember, Andy has very recently completed his tunnel at this point. Put yourself in Andy's shoes for a minute...

Sure, you would be wanting to clear your name...it's a big deal, I'm sure I'd want to do this. But 1) the Warden was unlikely to go along with this investigation and going around him would have proved difficult at best (even before an investigation started, the Warden took Tommy's life); and 2) even if you got an outside investigation started, you'd be in prison for another decade going through that and the appeals process. If the Warden was replaced, Andy's tunnel was certain to be found out about...attempted escape, another charge with a prison term.

Wouldn't it be easier...and better...to just stay with the tunnel plan? Heck, you've been digging for 20 years now, I'd hate not to use it right after I got done! Plus think of the money...you'd be unlikely to get much of a settlement back in the 50s...but after visiting a dozen banks in the Maine area after escape, you would have plenty of money to start your dream boat business. You'd much more easily prove the corruption at Shawshank and get the Warden and his deputies arrested doing what Andy eventually did. With the benefit of hindsight...You wouldn't have had to of spent a month in the hole (you'd have been on a beach instead). Your buddy Tommy would still be alive. The Warden and the guards would get their comeuppance. You'd actually use the tunnel you spent 20 years building. Ok, you wouldn't clear your name legally, but you're essentially rich and living a great life. To me, I'm sticking with the original plan even after Tommy's story.

reply

It's hope for a clear life. If his conviction had been thrown out, he's free and clear. Since he never used the tunnel they can't say escaped.
Attempted escape charges probably would have been thrown out as a condition of the wrongful imprisonment charges.

reply

Interesting points… but I wouldn’t change a frame of this film, the twist is just too amazing (plus it makes sense that Andy would want his name cleared so he can live a normal life)

reply

We've all seen this film now dozens of times, but remember, WE didn't know that Andy had a tunnel virtually completed when Tommy came up with that story - for all the time we've seen Andy in his almost 20 years at Shawshank, we didn't see the tunnel project until the Warden found it behind the poster, and then later when Red recounts his efforts.

So it comes down to story telling and movie making. When Tommy was murdered, we thought Andy was not only screwed for life, but suicidal as well. Remember that scene where Red was worried about Andy killing himself and then Andy didn't appear at roll call? Great scene that takes place because we didn't know Andy had an escape plan.

Also, there was still an element of risk involved if Andy got caught during the escape. Clearing his name legally wasn't a terrible option.

reply

So what if WE didn't know? I'm talking about this from Andy's perspective. Early on I wrote "Put yourself in Andy's shoes for a moment"... what the audience knew at that moment wasn't my point.

reply

So , basically , given all the reasons it was never going to work highlighted in the OP , Andy got Tommy killed through his nievety

reply