Linda Hamilton is the poor person's Sigourney Weaver
She looks the part but is grating whereas Weaver was relatable and compelling
shareShe looks the part but is grating whereas Weaver was relatable and compelling
shareShe was playing a crazy person! She wasn't supposed to be relatable!
And IMHO it's the one time in Hamilton's career where she gave a great Weaver-like performance. While Weaver has given dozens of great Weaver performances, she's always excellent.
Leonardo Di Caprio played a crazy person in "Shutter Island" and yet was still somewhat relatable. Many of the characters in "Cuckoo's Nest" were relatable despite being crazy (though the joke of the movie is they're no crazier than the average person out on the street). I think crazy people in movies can be relatable ... if played by decent performers. Unfortunately, Hamilton isn't decent.
shareNo, Hamilton was playing a crazy bitch who was way out on the edge, who'd been normal and likeable in the last movie but who'd been turned into this murderous psycho monster by circumstances beyond her control. She isn't supposed to be likeable or relatable, she's supposed to make you afraid for her likeable, relatable child!
That given, she was awesome! Charismatic and terrifying, yet oddly sympathetic at moments. Not too many moments though, the real protagonist of the movie was the kid.
She never did much for me.
But thank you. Perhaps when I watch it again I can keep your words in mind and maybe, consequently, enjoy her work here a little bit more.
Gosh, thanks for saying that!
It's really the only time I've seen Hamilton go out on a limb, usually she plays the nice gal. It worked for me.
"She isn't supposed to be likeable or relatable, she's supposed to make you afraid for her likeable, relatable child!"
Is that a joke? Edward Furlong's John Connor wasn't just the most annoying character in the movie (Linda Hamilton's Sarah Connor was the second most annoying character in the movie), but it was also one of the most annoying characters in movie history.
Hamilton was great in T1 so I don't blame her; I blame the way she was directed and the way her character was written in T2. As for Furlong, the way he was directed and the way his character was written sucked too, but he sucked as well. He was a non-actor with a cracking voice and a lesbian haircut.
What many either don't know or forget is when Linda was asked to come back for T2 she is the one who said she wanted Sarah to be crazy and the writers/Cameron complied with her wishes.
People need to understand that their subjective opinions do not equal facts.
Hamilton has proven her acting skills over decades, and while I love Weaver as an actress, especially for Alien, I do not see how Hamilton is for whatever reason so bad.
Fuck off clown.
I stated my opinion. Nowhere in that opinion did I say it was fact. You on the other hand suggesting that it's beyond debate whether Hamilton is good or not seem to be the very person you take issue with in your first sentence.
I know I am 7 months too late, Angular Turnip, but I am pretty sure that last poster Kendrick was talking to MaximRecoil who hates Terminator 2 and calls anyone who likes it more than the first one bad words.
shareHamilton was hit and miss because of haphazard project choices. T1 and T2 are two of the best movies ever, even Children of the Corn is an underrated 80s slasher classic, but then she also picked crap like Black Moon Rising and Shadow Conspiracy. T2 shows she has chops when the right project is there; a lot of actresses would've made T2 Sarah much less memorable.
shareWeaver is good as the hero, but for this part, you don’t want a co-hero. Hamilton brought the right amount of vulnerability and crazy.
She was relatable in the original.
shareI understand that they fall into that same "strong female character" category, but they're so different, I don't find them comparable. Hamilton plays two entirely different characters in Terminator 1 and 2; Weaver plays versions of the same character in Alien/s. They're both great, though.
shareI think many of the comments here missed the point with Hamilton's Sarah Connor in T2; the character was putting on a strong face the whole time. She was masking her fear and vulnerability by going extreme in her actions the other way. She is still the same character as in T1; she is still that scared young girl facing something far beyond reason and control. there are 2 moments in which you see this; when she sees the T-800 for the first time in T2 and when she is about to kill Dyson. The rest of the film she never drops the act. It is actually something that makes the character so interesting.
Compare this to Weaver's performance in Alien and Aliens; the entire time she is not putting up an act, she is just playing the character how the character is feeling, everything is up front. Don't get me wrong Ripley is awesome, she faces her fears with bravery; but she also does not try to hide them. Compare that with Hamilton's sarah Connor there is almost 2 roles she is playing at the time. She has to both act it out like her character is putting on an act of toughness but at the same time underneath is still the character from the first film. It is brilliantly done.
I agree with your comments regarding Ripley. But the thing I've always liked about Hamilton's Connor is how she comprises two opposing sides of the same person from film 1 to film 2.
Yes, she's scared for her life in The Terminator, but she also has a kind of natural mental fortitude and joyfulness that Judgement Day Sarah Connor completely lacks. In Terminator 2, she's the opposite of that - dry, humorless and unhinged. She's all work and no play, completely focused on protecting her son, but utterly unattached to the role of mother and finding no joy in the reunion with her child.
Ripley is ultimately the same character, with some adjustments with each movie, but she's never a completely different person. So, for me, comparing the two is unnecessary and a little unfair.
"she also has a kind of natural mental fortitude and joyfulness that Judgement Day Sarah Connor completely lacks. In Terminator 2, she's the opposite of that - dry, humorless and unhinged."
That is just it though; she does have those qualities still; but she is hiding them in T2. She feels like she has a duty and she has become obsessed with it so much to the point she is almost like a machine. She did find joy in reuniting with her son; but she hides it.
It makes her a complex character. Ripley is awesome but she is also much more simple and upfront.
Good post, they aren´t really comparable. The difference in Ripley´s character is 57 years of being frozen. Sarah Connor goes from happy-go-lucky waitress/damsel in distress, to Nicaraguan guerilla trained bad-ass.
shareThanks.
shareI was not comparing the characters; I was comparing the performances. But I agree; they are not really comparable characters. Although they do have very deep motherly instincts and value their 'child's' life (John/Newt) more than their own. They have both been through very traumatic experiences that left them broken people trying to put themselves back together; they both demonstrate competence with firearms and can hold their own in a fight. Ripley I would say is overall quicker thinking on her feet and overall more capable (for example her use of the freight loader to fight the queen, I don't think Sarah would have thought of something like that (then again she did smash the terminator with the hydrophilic press in T1). Actually now that I am thinking about it they are actually more comparable then i thought.
share