MovieChat Forums > Batman (1989) Discussion > If Michael Keaton was never Batman, othe...

If Michael Keaton was never Batman, other actors who might have pulled it off


Kurt Russell: He would have been able to bring the character depth that Keaton did and given the character the more tough, physical aspects of Batman as well.

Billy Campbell: He certainly looks like Bruce Wayne stepped out of the comics and grew his hair out a bit! I like Bill a lot for Bruce Wayne, but not for Batman. More’s the pity. In 1989, the idea of masking Batman’s voice with an electronic distortion wasn’t part of the film; had that been the case, he would be a much stronger candidate in my book.
He was good in “The Rocketeer”, and I think that was a good fit for him, and though he certainly LOOKS the part, I’m not sure he could have been a good Batman

Ray Liotta: He was offered to audition but turned it down, but later regretted it, he would have handled the intimidating side of Batman, no question, but he also could have captured the human vulnerability of Bruce Wayne; which is a juggling act of emotional range not every ‘80s leading man had.

Alec Baldwin: say what you want about his private life or controversies, but he could have pulled it off in the 80s, especially if he bulked up like Cavill or Bale did for their roles. Also he looks like Bruce Wayne from the 70s comics

Others who were considered
-Mel Gibson: Good choice, but too short
-Harrison Ford: Good choice, but was probably too big of name
-Pierce Brosnan: He'd make a good Bruce Wayne, but Batman IDK, had he gotten then he wouldn't have gotten the chance to play James Bond
-Kyle MacLachlan: Would have been young enough to carry the series and grow into the role
-Dennis Quaid

reply

bruce campbell

reply

Until recently, Baldwin would have been my ideal 80s/90s Batman/Bruce Wayne. He looked the part, he has the voice, and he was arguably the WASPiest out of all the options, so he gave the vibe of being an old-money type, and I could see him possessing the physicality to do a lot of the action scenes. But in view of recent events, I now wonder if Burton-Batman fans dodged a bullet...Keaton may not look like the classical Bruce Wayne from the comics, but he brought a lot of personality to the part, and it was a unique take on the character (i.e. the brooding loner/misfit, who only becomes a threat when he dresses up in an imposing bat-outfit), and thankfully, Keaton hasn't been involved in any controversies which might have tarnished his films in hindsight (in contrast to, say, Baldwin and Gibson).

reply

As an aside, and as a big fan of The Rocketeer, had DC/WB chose to do a full DC Universe reboot circa early 90s, Billy Campbell would have been my pick for Superman/Clark Kent, with Alec Baldwin as Batman/Bruce Wayne. I think Campbell would have had the warmth to play Superman, if not the darkness for Batman.

reply

val kilmer would have been perfect batman subsitute.

the problem kilmer have is he is great batman but he in shit batman film.

but if keaton pass on this then i think kilmer be good substitute

reply

I'm surprised that nobody mentioned Val Kilmer yet. I think that Val is pretty underrated/underappreciated as Batman simply because he immediately followed Michael Keaton and his tenure was so short. Also, Batman Forever falls into that weird conundrum in that it's not as controversial or polarizing as Batman Returns and yet it isn't universally loathed and disdained as Batman & Robin with George Clooney.

reply

i think batman forever is just plain shit while returns is weird shit and robin is mega shit

there is no saving forever. it is god awful. they make it too bright and cartoonish because returns was too grim. jim carrey was only cast because he was huge star at time. TLJ was just annoying cartoon bad guy. the batmobile looked like shit run over twice. the music suck. sharon stone should have played chase merdian as she should have been catwoman in returns. i could go on

but yes val kilmer was excellent

reply

Baldwin would've been a solid choice. Only issue with him is that he was actually in a real life romantic relationship with Kim Basinger. When I watch Batman I see Bruce Wayne and Vicky Vale no Michael Keaton and Kim Basinger, With Baldwin in the lead role it might have been the contrary. Also Mel Gibson is about 5'9-5'10 which is the same height as Keaton. I couldn't see him in the role whatsoever, but it has nothing to do with his height

reply

At the time, I'd have been more inclined to cast Baldwin or Gibson, who looked more like the classical hunky leading men types.

In hindsight, THANK GOODNESS we got Keaton over either of those two (in other words, this film has thankfully aged well).

reply

Thank goodness Tim Burton saw it in Keaton's eyes. Burton knew it and knew it all too well

reply

I think John Larroquette could have been a good Joker. I think in the 90s he played some sort of homicidal character on The Practice plus he has good comedic timing.

reply

Incidentally, John Larroquette had worked with Kim Basinger before in a film called Blind Date, which is probably best known now for being Bruce Willis' first feature film as a leading man. And Larroquette is physically, closer to the comic book description of the Joker than Jack Nicholson. The comic book Joker is said to be 6'5" in height while John Larroquette is about 6'4" himself.

reply

Great choices here, and in the other replies. I particularly like the unorthodox choices of Bruce Campbell the other Campbell from Rocketeer.

I have a new one. I don’t know if he’s considered leading man handsome to the ladies, which certainly doesn’t matter to me, but might to Warner’s executives in 1989.

TIMOTHY HUTTON

29 at the time. Actually 6’0’’… three inches taller than Keaton. Already an Oscar winner (most choices weren’t), and it was for a role of tortured, traumatized soul (in Ordinary People from 1980) dealing with loss. Did some yelling, believably crazy… full of rage. Later did a role requiring dual personality in Stephen King’s The Dark Half.

My only stipulation is he bulk up at least to the extent Christian Bale did.

The best thing about it is I have a feeling that maybe his lighter Bruce Wayne in Returns (as opposed to Keaton talking about Ted Bundy and so forth) would mean there would be less backlash against Tim Burton’s multifaceted darkness scaring children… and therefore both he and Hutton would stick around for multiple more movies into the 90s/00s.

No backlash. No Joel Schumacher necessary… because Hutton doesn’t appeal to the campy fags anyhow. Nobody would care about Hutton’s batnipple suit… no square jaw, which is fine by me if he plays the way I envision.

It’s about character. Hutton has the elitist character of Bruce Wayne, facade or no. We would be sold on him not being suspected as the caped crusader as well. Sean Young was initially pegged for Vicki Vale, and I think she may have chemistry with Hutton. So, we can lose Basinger also… no sweat.

Nicholson stays of course—first billing!

Donald Sutherland could be Alfred, which would be interesting as they already had father/son dynamic from 1980’s Best Picture winner.

Nobody thinks about Timothy Hutton today, that’s for sure, but he would grow along with the role… would be more grateful than Keaton for the opportunities, and would now be respected A-Lister!

https://youtu.be/3aWs7YChHEo

reply

Great choice, his performance would be a mix of Christian Bale and Robert Pattinson, Nicholson could stay as Joker, Dent maybe be a different actor (Ray Liotta), Vale (Yeah Sean Young), probably someone younger than Hutton, I'd keep DeVito as Penguin, Michelle Pfeiffer, but probably someone a little younger, for the third, Robin Williams would the Riddler, Marlon Wayans would play Robin, Sutherland as Alfred could work, but Burton casted Michael Gough because of his performances in Hammer films, maybe Sutherland as Gordon?

reply

Daniel Day-Lewis

reply