Why Glenn Close?


I don't get it, she doesn't exactly ooz sex appeal. There must've been dozens of other beautiful actresses who could've played this part. Why did they go with Glenn?

reply

Close was cast because she's a great actress. If they had cast a Playboy model with no acting talent, you'd be left with a second-rate film.

Moreover, Dan got involved with Alex because of her sexual aggression, not because of her exceptional beauty (not that the younger Close is bad looking by any means).

reply

Close was cast because she's a great actress. If they had cast a Playboy model with no acting talent, you'd be left with a second-rate film.
But then the question becomes– why didn't they just choose a sexy woman who could also act? Surely the two attributes are not mutually exclusive. But I think the answer has to do more with a combination of looks and acting, rather than just acting alone.

They didn't just choose her because she was the best actress – or else they could have chosen any number of people. A lot of people good actresses. And a lot of people are pretty. But it's the combination of the right acting with the right look that makes a good actress great.And it also has to do with context – who are her other cast mates? What is the story about? Does she look good alongside the other cast mates? Is it a beautiful cast altogether – and do they have chemistry? All of these things matter – it isn't just about who can act well. Apparently, the casting director of this film noticed that Glenn close and Michael Douglas had a good chemistry and looked good together. And that made it work.

As you so aptly pointed out in the second part of your post, Dan didn't get with Alex because she was necessarily the most beautiful woman (though I don't think she was bad looking either), he got with her because of her magnetism and her aggression. But again, that is it just because Glenn close was great acting it out. She did indeed have the right look for the part. People underestimate how important appearance is – especially in the movie business. They talk about so-called "great actresses" (as opposed to great beauties) Bette Davis and Glenn Close, like their looks don't ever matter. But they do.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

"Close was cast because she's a great actress. If they had cast a Playboy model with no acting talent, you'd be left with a second-rate film."

Because that's all that's available when movies are being cast--great unattractive actresses, or Playboy models with no talent. If only there were some nice-looking women who could also act. Oh, well.

reply

That explanation falls apart immediately. In between "great actress" and "Playboy model with no acting talent" there are many, many women who are attractive, sexy, and good--even great--actresses.

reply

Because she is an amazing actress, sure she is no Sharon stone In the looks department but she looked attractive enough to make the story believable.

And the second half of the film required more acting ability than looks

reply

In terms of looks Anne Archer>>>Glenn Close. For sure.

reply

you could've asked the same question about Michael Douglas. Why him? He looked so old and there are tons of other good looking actors in Hollywood than him.

reply

[deleted]

Nail. On. The. Head!!!

reply

you could've asked the same question about Michael Douglas. Why him? He looked so old and there are tons of other good looking actors in Hollywood than him.
That is true. Us women like good looking men as much as men like good looking women. Only Hollyweird thinks we'd take any average slob. They just want to give tacky men high hopes.

reply

I know! Michael Douglas = HIDEOUS! WTF... LOL...now Val Kilmer or Tom Cruise...yum yum 😍

reply

You should watch the making of the film. The director made it all about 'real' people and emotions. Not every woman who has an affair and becomes a stalker has to look like Marilyn Monroe. They wanted someone who could play a psychotic person. The looks don't matter. In fact it was good casting. Give the role to someone who wants to strut out what she has and she could not have come up with the anger and psychotic looks.

reply

There are plenty of far more attractive women who could have effectively played a psychotic person. It's not an "either-or" casting dilemma.

reply

I think casting average looking actors (Douglas and Close) makes this movie far more realistic.

I've been cheated on before and imo the other woman was less attractive than I just as Close is less attractive than the woman who plays the wife.
This has been the case for several people I know. The other man or other woman isn't necessarily more attractive than the significant other.

Cheating typical stems from boredom, an unsatisfying, and unfulfilling relationship. Alex was sexually aggressive. She was new and intriguing. Douglas' character gave into a moment of weakness and boom..one night stand ensued.

reply

Ok I get you, it's just that you don't normally watch these movies for the plot if you what I mean. You can't ask the same question about Douglas because these kind of movies aren't normally aimed at male sexuality. People don't watch erotic thrillers to perv at male actors, its pre-dominantly at the women. How many people watch disclosure and just skip to the obvious.

reply

In most cases I would agree with you but in this case I think the eroticism lies in the fact that this could be any us. Everyone, at one time or another, has had a small moment of weakness where they thought "What if?" I personally feel, and you are free to disagree, that this movie works (where others haven't) because the two leads are phenomal actors but do not possess this ethreal, god-like beauty one expects in these movies. Also the movie was less about the hot, erotic sex and more about the sheer insanity of this woman and acts as a modern day cautionary tale...The grass isn't always greener on the other side.

When the movie relies solely on the sex (like Unfaithful) then yes the audience wants to see two attractive, young people but when it's more about thr physcology behind an affair, a mental breakdown, and the terror one feels when their world is crashing down around them, then attractiveness is less important, in my opinion at least.

reply

Um I think you're makiing a huge assumption by saying most people watch movies to perve on actors of the opposite sex. You also have a very low threshold for entertainment if you can sit through 2 hours of a film for this reason only.

reply

Cheating can be from lots of things other than boredom. There's nothing in the film to suggest Dan is bored or that they don't have a good marriage. He found Alex attractive, his wife was away & he didn't think he would get caught. I honestly don't think there was anything more to it than that.

And yes I know people who've been cheated on with less attractive people. Far, far less in some cases. It happens just ask Elin Nordegren, Sienna Miller, Liz Hurley, Eminem etc

reply

I never said borefom is the only reason people cheat nor did I say it was the reason our main character cheated. Boredom was one of three reasons I listed.

reply

It happens just ask Elin Nordegren, Sienna Miller, Liz Hurley, Eminem etc

Also, Princess Diana and Maria Shriver, most definitely!

Feminism is the "radical belief" that women are people, and should be paid and treated equally.

reply

>>Cheating typical stems from boredom, an unsatisfying, and unfulfilling relationship.

Right, none of which applies to Dan. So I am really lost.

reply

Cheating typical stems from boredom, an unsatisfying, and unfulfilling relationship. Alex was sexually aggressive. She was new and intriguing. Douglas' character gave into a moment of weakness and boom..one night stand ensued.


You have it spot on here my learned friend. I always though Dan was having some sort of mid-life crisis and have said as much on these boards on other threads. There are many subtle clues regarding this. We see love between him and Beth but no intimacy as such.

Clue one: "Oh Jimmy's ok. He's just a little insecure like the rest of us" (To Alex upon their first meeting).

Clue Two: Dan returning after walking Quincy that same night to find his daughter in the marital bed and the look of disappointment on his face. He was perhaps sexually a little deprived.

Clue Three: "Oh thank God" after Alex congratulated him on his sexual performance. He needed to reaffirm his virility and seemed very pleased that he still "had it".

Everyone gets tempted and I thought all the characters were attractive. Michael Douglass looked actually rather handsome back then and I was 20 years or so his junior. I just think a catalogue of events drove him to it. The fact Alex presumptiosly flagged a taxi for them BOTH, the fact it carried on driving by, the fact it was pouring with rain and his umbrella had broken. The drink was innocent I believe but she seduced him over dinner and he softened thinking he could have a one-night stand whereby nobody would find out. It was handed to him on a plate. Both had been drinking and he may have lost his inhibitions and temporarily his loyalty to Beth.

"These days you have to boil someone before you can sleep with them"

reply

I don't get it either.

Yes, she's a fine actress. But guess what? That doesn't make me want to have sex with her. She isn't attractive. In the film Dan is happily married to a FAR more attractive woman. There just...isn't any incentive. I understand that even a happily married guy could be seduced by a beautiful young woman, and vice versa. We have certain weaknesses, humans. But having a meaningless fling with an ugly coworker? There is no reason for it except that it must happen to forward the plot. It's the worst kind of filmmaking.

It just isn't possible for me to suspend my disbelief enough that I could see this guy sleeping with/spending a romantic weekend with Glenn Close when he has Anne Archer at home. I don't care how drunk, or stressed, or horny he is.

And seriously, stop with the "the movie wouldn't have been effective with some playboy playmate!!" nonsense. That's a ridiculous straw man argument. There are plenty of attractive actresses who aren't porn stars or skin mag models. It isn't that difficult to find an actress more attractive than Glenn Close.

reply

"In the film Dan is happily married to a FAR more attractive woman. There just...isn't any incentive. "

Dude, reality check:
- Hugh Grant cheated on Liz Hurley with a 2 dollar black whore.
- Tiger Woods cheated on his Swedish hotter-than-hell wife with whatever tramp crossed his path.

Need more examples of idiots cheating on gorgeous young women with uglier tramps? SOME guys eventually get fed up with eating caviar and will jones for a cheeseburger.

And that's without getting into the whole "she may be pretty but she's a high maintenance bore" thing, which may also apply in some cases...

reply

You sounds like a bitter person, not to mention a racist piece of *beep*

reply

Nope, I'm just the opposite: fed up with cheeseburgers and jonesing for some caviar...

reply

Racist? Because he mentioned that the two-dollar whore was black? That's absurd.

reply

[deleted]

You really do sound like a bitter tool and racist loser. Hope you one day get over whoever cheated on you and dumped your fugly a**

reply

Finally someone agrees with me. Hurraah!

You hit it on the nail, no offense to Glen Close, I am sure she is a great actress, but would you really have an affair with someone so average looking. She has no sex appear whatsoever, and was completely wrong for this movie.

I have a collection of nearly 200 softcore movies, this is the only movie of this type that isn't in my archive, like Ace said no matter how horny I am I can never get aroused with the raunchy scenes in this film.

reply

Because men don't always cheat because of looks. Cheating can be a power and ego thing for some people. Some people like the thrill of it.

reply

[deleted]

It just isn't possible for me to suspend my disbelief enough that I could see this guy sleeping with/spending a romantic weekend with Glenn Close when he has Anne Archer at home.
-------------------------------------

But that's just the point. Anne Archer WASN'T AT HOME!!!

HA HA!!!👹

Besides that. Alex Forrest had oodles of charisma. As most psychotic people do.

reply

Acting ability first and then looks. Glenn is not unattractive, and in Fatal Attraction she's never described as some kind of sexually ravishing woman. Dan is attracted to her. He doesn't make her out to be the sexiest woman he's ever seen.

reply

Close is unattractive, and particularly unattractive in this movie. There are many much more attractive women with first-rate acting ability. It's not an "either an actress or a centerfold" dilemma. Jessica Walter, for example--a very attractive woman--was extremely effective as a psycho in "Play Misty for Me".

reply